Legal Brothels and Islam

Back on my post about Third World Shithole Territory, paulmurray makes a comment:

Prostitution is the answer. A few legal brothels in Islamic hot-spots would make the world a safer place.

I thought about it and started writing a comment - then realized the damn thing was turning into a post. So here it is.
======================================================================
Some thoughts:

We have legal prostitution here in New Zealand. The women are still crazy as hell.

Islamic women would never work in the biz. Seriously. Spread their legs for the less-than-elite? When they can share a top-20% man-slave? No way! Even the uglier ones can probably get in the top-40% of men.

Men paying for prostitutes want at least decent-looking ones. Especially Islamic men. The complete fuglies can go to hell, a goat is more attractive.

Which leaves sex-slaves. I suppose that a rich man with several dozen or a hundred surplus sex-slaves could set up a brothel with okay-ish looking women and make a good chunk of money in the process. Being rich, he can set it up legally. (Remember the Golden Rule. He who has the gold, makes the rules. He also fucks is best-looking concubines.)

Note that I say okay-ish looking women. According to the Sharia a man is allowed to fuck and impregnate as many of his concubines aka sex-slaves as he desires. Mohammed said so.

So I guess that we can get rid of our wimminz by exporting them. (Bye-bye Chanty Binx! You will never be missed!) Sadly, that means our okay-ish and better-looking women. Which quite frankly they can have some of them - and they do, when it comes to Dubai Porta Potties and that dead-eyed Russian chick who went over there.

This brings some things to mind:

Should we really export all our slags off to the Middle East? Sell them off as concubines. Maybe even set them up in brothels that we ourselves run for the Islamic men. Might as well make hay while the sun shines.

That would leave our less-than-top-20% of men really desperate for pussy. They might turn into the same low-life scumbags who do what happens in the Middle East. (I mean, chase goats and young boys and each other. Though suicide-bombing too, come to think of it.)

Of course, we could fast-track sexbots. That would solve the humpy-humpy problem straight away.

Now, reproduction and breeding. With less wimminz, our rate of reproduction would drop. Of course, we're already below replacement levels. We should also fast-track artificial wombs.

We may actually be on to a winner here. Export our less-desirable slags to whorehouses in Islamic hot-spots. Just have to make sure to keep Islam as a whole the fuck away from our personal shores.
======================================================================

Note: We can completely ignore the spin-fed articles about Western wimminz birth rate climbing, etc - because "they're just choosing to have them later in life".

Utter bullshit.

A generation is 25 years. If the above is true, it is less-than-relevant. Stretching that generation to 40+ years still puts the West far behind on the reproduction curve in comparison to the rest of the world. We might be smarter, we're still being outbred - because right now the misery of breeding just isn't worthwhile.

Worse, those breeding (any wimminz of 30+ yo) or attempting to breed (because 12% of wimminz under 29yo are sterile), or 30+yo's, according to a Menken-Larsen study in 1986 (interesting that no studies have been published recently). These are not our youngest, most fertile groups of wimminz. They have a higher rate of genetic-deformity (downs syndrome etc).

Not a pretty picture for the West, and fuck the leftists and PC retards who are trying to cover up our decline.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

The Female Solution to Worthless Degrees™

Sell your virginity to the highest bidder!

Apparently there are two websites who cater to high-end fucktoys that want a kickstart in life, by selling their virginity to the highest bidder:

Back in April, a Hong Kong businessman paid $2.5 million for 18-year-old Romanian lingerie model Aleexandra Khefren’s virginity. She was financially distressed, of course. In fact, millions of millennials around the world are facing financial difficulties and are comfy with trading sex for their next debt servicing payment. [Emphasis mine. - BPS] They are using websites like Cinderella Escorts and SeekingArrangement, two of the most well-known match-makers in the space that facilitate big-ticket trysts.

I have an interesting question for the buyer:

If these girls have gone through the entire school of academic insanity and come out the other side with a Worthless™ degree - how many cocks did she "accidentally fall on" on the way?

A hymenoplasty never felt so good!

You pathetically stupid delusional fuckers HAHAHAHAHAHAH...!

This Slap of Reality™ brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

And a fucksight cheaper than $2.5 million!

Economics of Sexbots

Eyes, balls, brains - all here and accounted for. Hold on tight, we're about to rip the guts straight out of Feminism and the entire gynocentric society we live in.

Sexbots, sex dolls, you-name-it, it's getting better.

In the past, I've written about the general cost of pussy and if it's actually worth it. (Synopsis: nope.)

Now that sex dolls and sexbots are becoming more affordable - and men are becoming less worried about what teh wimminz think socially - things are changing out there.

Before, I wrote of two generally-broad paths:

* marriage and kids and all that, costing you something like $1.3 million dollars over 20 years (more if you get divorce-raped)

...vs...

* bringing in $2 million dollars over 20 years (and spending $200k of that on a variety of whores)

There is now another path coming "out of the closet" as it were.

The sex dolls (now) and sexbots (to come).

Back on my post re "is that pussy worth it?" linked above, I stated that a man can earn $100k a year and spend about $10k a year on a variety of decent-quality (young) whores. End result is $90k a year in his pocket.

You can get a quite realistic sex doll for under $3k.

Either - both - of these are vastly better than the modern sexually dysfunctional sand bucket chick who has a minimum 12% chance of being sterile if she's under 29 years old. (Or who tries to catch you out with a whoopsie.)

The very, very interesting thing though - it gets better. Way, way better, when it comes to the comparison of whores vs sex dolls.

You see, there are already whorehouses in asia that have sex dolls rather than whores. The Japanese have their love doll brothels. In Barcelona a whorehouse has opened that has sex dolls instead of whores. There is a Dublin whorehouse that rents out a sex doll for 100 euro per hour.

This tells me three things:

1/ Men prefer fucking a whore rather than having a modern "wife".

2/ Men prefer fucking a doll rather than fucking a whore.

3/ Whores are such a fucking pain in the ass that even brothel owners want to be rid of them.

I shit you not about #3 there. Even 30 years ago (before I drank the kool-aid and married a BPD/NPD woman) I knew that brothels were damned harsh with their whores. Many of them were (and still are, something else that I experienced 3-4 years ago) stuck-up cunts who don't live in reality. Brothels know better - they want satisfied, repeat customers! (Ditto for strip-clubs.)

So for a brothel, a good chunk of the "take" goes to the girl involved. Plus making sure that she stays clean, gets checked regularly, doesn't fuck off the customers, etc.

In comparison, a doll is a one-off purchase that merely requires maintenance after each usage. Customers who damage a doll pay for it out of their pocket.

No cunty personality to deal with. No hassles keeping them clean and checked. No scrambling because someone is on the rag or is in a state 'cause their boyfriend found out what they actually do for a living. Keep most of the money. Customers are guaranteed happier 'cause the whores ain't jacking 'em around.

This is a definite win-win-win fuckin' situation for the brothel-owner.

It's also a damn good win-win-win situation for a man with the space to buy his own sex doll rather than rent one out for a time.

Over 3 years time, a man can get a "stable" of 3 different sex-dolls (each with their own hair/eyes/other accessories) for about $10k all up (including maintenance for those 3 years).

That's much better than $30k for a variety of whores over that time-period. Plus dealing with whatever weird-ass attitudes and the risk of STDs that they bring into your life. (Yes, you pay them to go away once you're done.)

With the AI that they're working on these days - talking sex dolls - memory - responses - moaning when you do certain things (built-in sensors) - you get the picture. It's getting more...

...real.

In a doll-like, puppet-like, controlling manner. You get what you want, which is sex and silence.

This is 2017. By 2030, I suspect that these sex dolls might be coming very, very close to full-on sexbots.

If in 2030 you spend $20k on a very high-end sexbot - one that's actually useful in ways other than simply poking it with your dick - then you are far ahead of the game even when it comes to whores and sex dolls. You actually have something that both:

a/ brings pleasure

b/ makes your life easier

It looks like in that 13-year time-period, the vagina will be ripped right out of the "oldest profession". It will cease to exist. Plus, a man who follows this path is going to have at least $100k in pocket, saved cash, to pick-and-choose his new companion. Why only one?

That's going to utterly gut feminism and the modern strong, empowered wimminz. You will work - period. You will not marry - no man will want you. You will be just another cog in the work-sleep-consumption cycle of our eternal-slavery civilization.

A civilization where actually being interested in fucking a woman will be an extremely rare surprise and validation of her existence. Rare as hen's teeth and unicorn blood.

I would not be surprised if it becomes normal to be having sex with dolls and robots. Just look at the porn industry - razorblade manufacturers wanted to sell more product, so porn stars started shaving their privates. That sub-rosa message caught on and most women (and many men) are shaved. The same type of sub-rosa message could similarly be done to benefit the sexbot industry.

Poor feminists. Caught in the grinder of not needing a man, being able to do it all for themselves, and then even their vagina's literally being made worthless.

We have a ringside seat to this trainwreck.

A small sense of surprised and pleased schadenfreude - tonight, now, I will have a small glass of Grand Marnier. Something that I've not had in quite some time.

Nothing Has Changed

After some thinking prompted by Eduardo the Magnificent, I have changed my mind.
======================================

Originally I thought that Trump might have been a wake-up and shake-up sort-it-out for America.

Now I'm pretty-much thinking that nothing has changed. Just another dark-horse candidate who turned out to be the same as the rest.

So let's start another war in the middle-east: blow up an airfield in Syria.

Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince states:

Men ought either to be well treated or crushed, because they can avenge themselves of lighter injuries, of more serious ones they cannot; therefore the injury that is to be done to a man ought to be of such a kind that one does not stand in fear of revenge.

You crush them or you do nothing.

Empty mouthings by talking heads signify nothing. Only actions speak truth.

What truth does that single strike on Syria tell us?

"The military-industrial complex is going to have a good run of business for the next 4-8 years."

America doesn't absolutely need oil from the middle-east. If they want to, they can be very much energy self-sufficient. So they're just poking their nose in someone else's business, one of the most stupid damn things people ever do. (Gonna get that nose chopped off? Dumbass...)

Farewell, America. Stick a fork in you. You are done.

I will have to come over there in the next year or two, to tick a couple of things off my bucket-list. Grand Canyon. Grand Teutons. Yellowstone Park. That sort of thing. While I still can, before things get worse.
======================================

On an unrelated note, I see that Uncle Bob has not posted for over a week. I'm hoping that he's okay. Man is older than I am, hope it's not something unfortunately medical-related that's happened to him.

Prostitute Analysis

I've seen and heard of quite a few girls getting into "difficulty" (it's kinda hard to pay the bills when you're enough of a bitch to drive even the most love/lust-drunk man away). A few seem to be drifting into the casual prostitution arena. So here's a (very rough) analysis of the $$$ involved for her to make ends meet, plus the other non-$$$ costs of being a whore.

Professional prostitute, very rough income and expenditures:

* $150 for 1 hour of sex

* $-50 to the government in the form of taxes

* $-50 to the whorehouse you hang your shingle up in

150 - 50 - 50 = $50 cash in hand per hour

To make ends meet you probably need $750 a week cash in hand. That becomes:

750 / 50 = 15 customers a week

Of course, most of this isn't going to be in the normal 40-hour work-week. You are going to be working weeknights and weekends. You are probably going to get no more than 1 customer a night, perhaps 2 on occasion. The rest are on the weekend which means you have to be available at all times, even though you might not get a customer for several hours straight.

That means: 15-30 minutes travel time, 1 hour with a customer, 15-30 minutes travel time, and finally 15 minutes to clean yourself up. You can probably expect 2 hours of time per customer.

$50 per customer / 2 hours = $25 an hour

Because you are working weeknights and weekends, you don't get to socialize with "normal" people. You socialize with other sex-workers and low-lives and hospitality workers. You're competing with the local freely-available sluts and the whores using Tinder. (Call it "whorefinder" - as good a name as any.)

BTW if you have children, you need a minder - one that you usually have to pay. That comes out of your take-home $$$.

Casual "whorefinder" prostitute, very rough income and expenditures:

* $50 for 1 hour of sex

* $0 to the government in the form of taxes

* $0 to a whorehouse

The time taken is the same, so they get paid roughly the same: $25 an hour.

Now, your casual "whorefinder" prostitute - or just the opportunistic little slut who propositions a man for a few bucks so they can have a good night on the town - may not seem like much. They have some things going for them though:

* they are young (generally about 16-20, probably some "18yo" 14+yo's as well)

* they have no expenses (at least, until they get preggers)

* there are a LOT of them

* they drive down the price of sex for the professional prostitute

They also have disadvantages over the professional prostitute:

* nobody knows where they are (if things go wrong)

* nobody is checking them for STDs (the whorehouse generally insists and pays for this)

* they're generally stupid enough to have sex without protection

(Future single mommy and breeding-ground for every STD under the sun, you betcha. I do not recommend going for the casual "whorefinder" type. You're really asking for trouble. As Popp would say, a jab in the butt with unicorn blood and a harsh talking-to from your doctor.)

There you have it, all you wimminz. The grim reality of being a prostitute: 15+ customers (aka different men fucking you) a week, at $50 per fuck, you don't have a lotta choice on quality if you need the $$$ bad, you have to get checked for STDs regularly, you have competition from the sub-20yo crowd, children are very awkward to deal with, no real social life (certainly not with ordinary wimminz), and what's the chances of getting married etc to a good man if that's your fantasy?

Men, if you must bust a nut in a woman stick with the $200+ professionals. Less hassle and risks than the "whorefinder" lot and the general quality is going to be better.

Every soccer-mom wants to be a whore. Every whore wants to be a soccer-mom.

Wimminz, the choice is yours. You can pretend to be pleasant and happy and accomodating to 15+ horny men a week (looks and quality varies). Or you can genuinely be pleasant and happy and bring up a family and be God-damned grateful for the one man who keeps you all going - and not having to suck the cock and spread your legs for 60+ different men each month. (It gets worse if you're older.)

Women, if you must be a whore, then be a downright filthy whore for your husband. It's a much better lifestyle - be careful not to detonate it, or you might find yourself as a real and more desperate whore.

A bleak look at the realities of prostitution, brought to you by Crap-Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Get Shit Done

Ah, the West!

Once a group of obsessed mad motherfuckers who got shit done...

...now predominantly a bunch of pussies squabbling over which entitled bitch they can dump a cum into tonight.

Not all of 'em.

A good number though.

Maybe 80% of men.

While princess stands on her steel pedestal, legs primly together - at least until someone she fancies comes along. Then it's "all hands on deck" while she services him like a 50-cent whore in a back alley.

Which makes us Men a buncha "deplorables" and a big thank-you to Hillary. Like you never went out and fucked somebody behind the back o' Bill the Prez'.

Funny, given that he's supposedly shootin' blanks. Where the fuck did Chelsea come from? You been catchin' it from somebody else? What, you thought nobody would notice?

Yeah, just sweep that under the carpet. Along with that bitch Monica. You are so much the perfect presidential candidate.

At least us Men can read the writin' on the fuckin' wall. No shit Sherlock. Once we're done shoveling the gravel, we go and do our own thing...

...while the pussies can keep on keepin' on kissin' your rotten and well-used vagina.

One day that steel pedestal will rust all the way through. Princess will fall to lie in the dust, dirt, and muck.

Tell us, then what, whore?

Not Even Pretty

So Didact has a cogent piece about what the real price is for being a slut or whore. The price is her soul:

He is 100% correct in saying this, and 100% correct in saying that even a virgin can have that thousand-cock stare. Especially one who voluntarily elects as a virgin to become a Dubai Porta-Potty.

The really strange thing is that this (Russian) girl just isn't that pretty.

Seriously. Look at that face, those eyes, that mouth, that body-language. It all screams "high-priced nasty entitled cunt". It's completely dark, cold and dead inside - too the point of oozing through the fake shell/casing. That's the thousand-cock stare in a nutshell: cold and dead inside. To paraphrase/rephrase Didact: the soul is gone from this one.

In a very warped way I'm kinda glad that this one has gone to Dubai to be a toilet. That is, literally, it's only possible use in life: to be shit on. To be used as a cum-dumpster, endlessly. To be infected with every disease possible, so that the rarer and more worthy women are not.

There is no way in hell that any man should ever get this one pregnant. Not accidentally, not knocked up by a client, nohow noway. That soulless vacuum, that sucking void, will inexorably suck the life out of anyone or anything that isn't coated in teflon and insulated with a foot of asbestos. Any child/ren will be inevitably destroyed.

Those Arab Princes can have this one.

With our blessings and good wishes and many hopes for their enjoyment.

Parasites On The March

So somebody's pooped up on FaceCrap a petition focused on stopping sanctions against sole (aka single) mommies (page contents copied here):

Stop the Sanctions Petition

We are calling for the removal of Sections 176, 177, 178 from the Social Security Legislation Rewrite Bill.

These sections impose a weekly sanction of $22 or more on beneficiary sole mothers who have not identified the father of their child. This sanction (in its current form of Section 70A of the Social Security Act) is putting into further hardship families already struggling to survive.

Currently there are approximately 17,000 children in Aotearoa New Zealand for which this sanction is imposed. Of the 13,616 parents, 13,298 are women, and only 318 are men. 52.8% are Māori. This policy severely disproportionately effects women and Māori.

We request to the House of Representatives that the entirety of the provisions set out in Sections 176, 177 and 178 of the Social Security Legislation Rewrite Bill, which enable sanctions on the benefits of thousands of sole mothers and their children, be removed from the bill and from legislation.

For more information about these sanctions see our FAQ: Stop The Sanctions FAQ

I actually approve (somewhat) of Sections 176, 177, 178 from the Social Security Legislation Rewrite Bill.

Why?

Because they (the govt) are starting to pull back from the behavior which has encouraged 49% of New Zealand's children being born to single mommies. (A parasitic plague upon our society.)

Eventually they (the govt) will have to cut them off. There won't be any bloody money to hand over to them. Hopefully by that point, perhaps these cunts will have figured out that it's a good idea to use (cheap in NZ 'cause it's govt subsidized) birth control - or to keep their fuckin' legs closed.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Welcome to the Divorce-Grinder

Thanks to the men over at /r/MGTOW, I have discovered this particular webpage:

Marriage Statistics

Back on my post What do you like to do? I showed that it was more like a minimum of 53% of marriages end up in divorce (because the divorces were only reported from 44 of the states in the USA). In the page above they state 50%, though I can forgive them for that.

What I find very interesting is the failure rate of first marriages (a couple of tables up from the bottom):

First Marriage Survival (Probability of lasting more than 10 years) [Bold mine. - BPS]
Probability that a first marriage will survive 10 years = 6.6 % - 1 in 15
If there was no birth during marriage = 3.7 % - 1 in 27
If there was a birth before marriage = 6.5 % - 1 in 15
If there was a birth 0-7 months after marriage = 7.4 % - 1 in 13
If there was a birth 8+ months after marriage = 7.9 % - 1 in 12

If true (and I can see no reason why it wouldn't be - in fact, given the under-reported divorce stat I could make a case for these survival stats being slightly higher than reality) then this has to be the absolutely most damning piece of evidence against marriage in the USA. The entire Western World. (Hell, the entire world, period!)

So, look at those two statistics on that page. I'm'a spell it out:

50% of all marriages fail

--vs--

6.6% chance that a first marriage will survive 10 years

So the second statistic seems to be saying: 93.4% of all first marriages will fail within 10 years.

Which means the 50% of all marriages failing - might actually be within the first year. Only.

This fits in with my old post re the Real Divorce Rate in NZ.

I find this a very difficult poison pill to swallow. I can imagine it, though. If you think about it, reporting on the long-term chances of a first marriage failing at being over 93% - you'd just destroy the institution utterly. Not even the most stupid of male fools on this planet is gonna go for that. Maybe if you lobotomized him first.

It's more palatable (though still painful for men) to say "yeah, 50% of marriages fail". Try to minimize even that, sweep it under the rug, keep it outta the mainstream media as much as possible. Yeah, it won't happen to you, buddy. You live a charmed life. You're special. You're different from the rest. Yeah.

It doesn't seem like it's completely true, though. First year, sure. Further down the line though, once you've been her slave for 10 years, when there's some fairly substantial goods and money gathered together and put aside...

*pop*

...there goes your bubble.

From the above, 2.077 million men a year get married - of which ultimately 93% will be thrown into the divorce-grinder within 10 years of getting married. That averages out to 1.93 million married men every year getting screwed over and being stuck for x number of years (say, another 10+?) filling cupcake's pocket. During which time cupcake goes out and gets her vag crammed with as much cock as possible. (Anecdotally and depending, anyways - some P is Q != all P is Q.)

The more successful female predators getting a larger chunk of a slave's life due to being more patient? This really *is* the Art of Whore. The lawyers who take advantage of this, who feed off this, are the true bottom-feeding scum-sucking filth of this world. It's absolutely no wonder that divorced men with children loathe the Family Court system.

So. That's something pretty bitter and poisonous to have to swallow down, even for us men who've had our eyes opened to the bullshit around us. Just a matter of time, you're sure to be reamed anyway. Nothing else that I can think of shows as starkly just how disposable all men are in the eyes of the female sex.

Including our own sex - I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed, yet eventually even I twigged. Someone else will have caught it too. They know. They didn't open their mouths to try and sort it out - why/why not? Who knows?

By extension, it shows how truly screwed our civilization, our society, really is.

In my zombie-blue-pill-blinkered days, I basically had zero chance of achieving the lie that I'd been told all my life. No wonder that so many men these days resist the truth. No wonder that so many younger men resist marriage - they know that it's under-reported. It's actually way, way worse than we (at least, old fogies like me) had ever thought.

We are going to watch our civilization, our society, burn to the ground. I can see nothing that could possibly stop it, with that kind of shenanigans going on. Too much headwind against it. It would have to be an extremely radical (aka bloodily forceful and violent) social restructuring to actually make it worthwhile for men to keep things going. I don't know if the Western World has that kind of force left in them any more.

Brought to you by (an especially bleak look through) Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and absolutely priceless when it comes to getting pre-warning of your entire life and society and civilization and world going down the crapper. Probably sooner than you'd think and a helluva lot sooner than you'd like.

(I wonder what Terrence Popp and Blake of Redonkulas would make of this set of stats? Or Breitbart? Or would it be just too damn much to choke on?)

==================================================

ADDENDUM:

For a second and closer bleak look:

2.077 million marriages

-1.93 million eventual divorces

= 147,000 marriages every year which actually survive more than 10 years

Pathetic. Plus note that I don't comment upon the "happiness" of said marriages.

Prime Whore

So this is an oldie from the University of Man. (WTF happened to them? I dunno - never got it straight - and tbh really don't give that much of a shit. Some of the stuff was gold and that's all that matters in life: separating the chaff from the wheat.)

So here we have The Art of Whore, followed by a picture which exemplifies it 100%. Enjoy, and try to ignore the "alpha/beta" thing. It's just the difference between a strong and a weak man.

Bottom-feeding scum sucking Cory Catfish, thy name is beta.

Thank you for cleaning the algae and fecal remains of bigger, stronger, faster fish from the pond of society. You are the homeless guy I give my leftovers to, packaged in a glossy takeout box from a restaurant you could never afford. You, beta, are the malleable putty that fills the karmic gap between what she wants and what she deserves. If ever there was an exultant scavenger, a happy beggar, or a willful fool foraging through the rotting leftovers of discarded femdom like a soon-to-be roadkill raccoon, it's you. Thank you for your service.

A man with options would never put a ring on a finger that's been wrapped around a dozen cocks.

A man with options would never pay the ultimate price of commitment for a born-again virgin fucktoy.

A man with options would never let his son's first home be a womb that's seen more traffic than I-35 during rush hour.

A man with options would never allow his son's first kiss to come from the lips of a mouth that's hosted lotsa cocksa.

A man with options would never let his son's first nourishment come from a rack that can be viewed on any number of cell phones.

A man with options would never let his son's first throne be the lap of a woman who's been passed around like a blunt at a frat party.

A man with options would never be a dickstand for a woman who squandered her youth and beauty on the men who respected her the least.

A man with options would never consider being the last man standing at the end of a long line of conquests she racked up while being the Grand Marshal of a rather impressive cock parade.

Do men with options pass up on whores because of religious ethics?

Sometimes.

Do men with options pass up on whores because a promiscuous lifestyle stunts a woman's ability to bond with her husband and children?

Yeah, I reckon.

Do men with options avoid committing to whores because of social pride?

I certainly hope so.

But there's one gloriously simple, easy to define and even easier to defend reason why men with options do not marry whores: They don't have to. Beta males have four primary deficits when it comes to making sound relationship decisions, which leads them to permanently settle down with Gangbang Barbie after the rest of us are done with her.

The Art of Whore: Why Betas Marry Leftovers

(1) Their inability to identify a whore/slut

Thanks to a lack of experience with women, betas believe that a whore is a filthy girl who will sleep with just about anybody. When their pea-sized brains conjure up the idea of a whore, they imagine a woman who stops at a red light, sees a man waiting at a bus stop, and has an unbelievable urge to put the car in park and go bang him. Betas think a whore is a girl who goes out to the bar four nights a week and bangs four different men.

Dead wrong.

With this definition of a whore, it's no wonder why betas defend women - they've never seen a whore. But in reality, whores are selective. In fact, they're probably the most selective women in the mating market.

The Art of Whore is displayed by women who harness their sexual power and unleash it with stunning accuracy on the men at the top of the social hierarchy – often in a serially monogamous fashion (with a few "mistakes" along the way for good measure).

Wake up, beta. That nice girl in your social group who has a different boyfriend every three or four months on average, has casual hookups on vacation, and has that "special friend" who keeps her warm at night in between boyfriends is a two-bit worthless whore.
"But wait, Mentu! Most girls do that these days!"

Now you're getting it. Walk with me.

Whore is not about a number; it's about her decision-making abilities and the value she assigns to sexual congress. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, so the men she lets through the gates – regardless of how many or how few - tells you everything you need to know about her relationship value. I don't care if she's slept with 5 men or 50 men; her sexual past reveals her relationship worth and her ability to make sound decisions.
Take for instance a healthy 28-year-old woman. In my experience, your average American woman has had anywhere between 12 and 23 sexual partners by this time. Let's call it an average of 17. A reasonable man would not assume that all 17 men dumped her, or that she dumped all 17. A myriad of reasons, situations, emotions and circumstances led her to this place. So what does this tell us?

It tells us that a number of men just had fun with her (promiscuity), she had to bounce a number of men after she opened her womb to them (bad decision-making), and a number of men sampled a mini-relationship with her for a while and decided not to keep her around (low value).

So, beta, which of those 3 traits - promiscuity, bad-decision making, and low value - would you like to have instilled in your children? Which of those traits do you believe will make her an excellent wife? Which of these traits do you believe will not increase your likelihood of being cheated on or landing in divorce court? Can you see yourself waking up in the morning, rolling over, looking at her and thinking "Thank God I committed to a worthless whore who has a 15-year track record of making bad decisions?" Of course not.

But this leads us to the 2nd primary deficit of the beta:

(2) Their susceptibility to shaming language

Betas cower in fear and quickly acquiesce when confronted with shaming language. "I'm not like that anymore", "You can't judge me", and "A woman's worth is not decided by her sexual past" seem to be the go-to responses for women who find themselves in the awkward situation of justifying why they've banged more men than can be comfortably seated in a small Family Diner.

For the record, the correct responses are "Yes you are", "Yes I can", and when it comes to marriage, "Yes it is."

Does promiscuity make her a bad employee?

Nope.

Does it make her a bad friend?

Nah.

Does it make her an evil person who is likely to knock over a liquor store and steal a getaway car?

Not at all.

Does a promiscuous past mean she can't do good in the community and make profound societal contributions?

Of course not.

Does it make her a high-risk marriage partner and a shitty role model for your children in a society built around the family unit instead of the "it takes a village" approach?
According to the church, the Centers for Disease Control, your buddy who laughs at you behind your back, biological evidence, gender anthropologists, a growing number of psychologists, your own gut instincts, and yours truly: Yes, it most certainly does.

It always amazes me how betas will agree with a woman that her past education reveals her dedication to scholarly pursuits, her past work experience reveals her quest to improve her business acumen, her past payment history reveals her credit worthiness, her past workout routine reveals her desire for a healthy lifestyle, and her past volunteer efforts reveal her heart of gold, but her past sexual habits reveal absolutely nothing. That, my beta friend, is The Art of Whore.

If you buy into that shit, you deserve whatever ill may befall you.

(3) Their unnatural dedication to the female definition of "fairness"

Here's where the rubber meets the road for most bottom-feeding beta males.

We've all heard the statement, "It's not fair that a woman who sleeps around is a whore, but men who sleep around are studs!!" >:'O

There has been more than enough digital ink spilled on this topic within the manosphere, so I won't go into it. Everybody knows it's easy to be a whore, but hard to be a player - and society doesn't award trophies for doing easy shit. It's not a double standard; it's two different standards for two different genders with two different barriers of sexual entry and two different sets of risk factors.

But forget that for a moment. For the sake of this article, let's assume that the woman's statement is true. That's right, let's assume for a moment that there is an unfair evil double standard afoot.

What the fuck do you care?

If you're a beta male looking for marriage, it's not your job to be fair - this is your life, not a general assembly at the UN. Your job is to find the best mother for your children that you possibly can.

It doesn't matter if you banged 5,000 women on camera last night; you need to find the most competent, capable, qualified, trustworthy, physically and emotionally stable woman you possibly can to help raise your children.

Let her worry about your past and whether or not she thinks you're qualified to be their father, and you focus on her qualifications.

Come to think of it...That actually sounds quite fair, wouldn't you say?

(4) Their lack of options

When it comes to liaising with whores, Alphas are volunteers, and betas are voluntolds. The Art of Whore is not lost on the Alpha male - they volunteer to use them for what they're good for, then pass them off to the betas who are voluntold to put a ring on their finger.

Beta, your lack of options is making you weak, distorting your judgment, and may eventually land your pansy-ass in divorce court. The Art of Whore is real, and women work to better their craft every day. What have you done lately besides make excuses for her?

Women proficient in The Art of Whore get what they want: A decade-long ride on the cock carousel with no consequences, then a willing hapless beta with open arms, an open mind, and an open wallet to cushion their landing and finance their recovery.

As long as you're standing there ready, willing and able, I honestly can't say that I blame them for taking you up on your generous offer.

Here is an example of Prime Whore (I've lost count of how many girls I've fucked within an hour or two of meeting - and I'm just an average guy, pleasantly ugly at best):

Giving it up with a snap of the fingers for someone they don't really like, making the guy they like wait. How fucking sweet of this two-faced hypocritical cunt.

Enjoy your gangbang barbie.

Or learn to be strong.

Brought to you by Crap-Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

The Girlfriend Experience

Commenter Robert What? has a question about prostitutes and The Girlfriend Experience:

I agree that a prostitute who can provide the GFE is the way to go for older men, especially after they have had children or decided they are not having children. Basically as in marriage you are paying for sex and affection. But with a professional it is a lot less costly. In addition, whether the wife provides that sex and affection is totally at her whim. You still need to pay the price whether she delivers or not. If a professional doesn't deliver, you find another who will. If I was doing it all over again - knowing what I know now - I'd remain a bachelor and go that route.

That leads us to the next question. Although you might not have an answer for it. How does a man find such a professional who can provide the GFE? A brief search online turns up a lot of aging cows and jaded looking skanks.

For starters I decided that I'd better double-check exactly what GFE means. I got on to Urban Dictionary and found this definition:

gfe

Girl Friend Experience

Affection oriented escort.

And further down on the same page:

Girl Friend Experience

1. Shows up and acts like she wants to be there.

2. Deep french kisses.

3. Bare Back Blow Job.

4. Stays and provides service for the full hour.

If all four criteria are met the provider is known as a GFE.

Jaime is an excellent $200 GFE in the South Florida escort market.

That freaking agency said she was GFE but all I got was a lame CBJ, peck on the cheek,some doggy, and she left after 23 minutes.

I also looked at Ultimate GFE:

Ultimate GFE

Ultimate GFE (Girl Friend Experience)--when a prostitute behaves like her client's girlfriend in bed. A "regular" GFE experience will necessarily include kissing (both Light French and Deep French kissing), cuddling, and a generally unrushed experience. Ultimate GFE adds to this full and complete bareback sex (both oral and vaginal), much as one would do with one's girlfriend. An Ultimate GFE, in bed, is therefore completely indistinguishable from being with one's girlfriend.

"Dude, that chick I picked up on TER gave me an ultimate GFE experience...even got to cream inside of her."

So yes, it still means what I thought: you're paying for a prostitute to act like she's your girlfriend. I wasn't certain if the definition had changed.

(By the way: if you paid for an hour and the girl buggers off before that hour is done, you got ripped off. It doesn't matter if you can only orgasm once, you can still generally get it up again fairly quickly and have a bit more fun. You are paying for the use of her body for fun for a set time-period, not "until I orgasm". Remember that - complain loudly or rate negatively if she's from an agency - and never take that girl again. Now back to GFE.)

I've never engaged a prostitute for this type of thing, though I have been propositioned by a couple who offered it. One of them is an exceptionally cute 22yo who currently lives up in Auckland - her rate is $250 for an hour, an extra $30 for oral (no condom), if you want more than an hour then the hourly rate drops to $200 per. Longer costs less though I didn't inquire that deeply into it.

The second prostitute that I knew offered the full GFE for $1,500 a night. You got her for the full evening, night, and morning (usually 4pm to 10am). It included the works: being seen in public, dinner, breakfast, bathing/showering together, sex on demand, oral/anal/vaginal, fetishes, no protection at all - everything. That girl was 27yo and looked like Keiran Knightly with her hair cut short (danger sign right there).

So there's two prostitutes that I know offer(ed) these services. I suppose that finding another one would simply be a case of outright asking the girl if she provides the full GFE - there's no need to be embarrassed. From what I've seen and heard, many girls do not like blurring the boundaries like this: many actually do have real boyfriends and they see their job as being totally separate and professional. They work hard to partition the two.

Stepping back to take an overview, I can see two big reasons for not paying for the GFE:

1/ You're paying to have unprotected sex with someone who sells her body to many, many people for unprotected sex. Unlike the ordinary prostitute who should be using protection, these girls will get diseases. (Note that even ordinary prostitutes will not use protection if she's paid enough. Make sure that you always use protection.)

2/ The GFE experience involves cuddling - oxytocin - instinctive bonding. Men who have had many women can still bond, though with lesser intensity. Women who have had many men do not bond anywhere near so well. While it doesn't seem like a big deal from her side, from a paying customer's side it could be damn problematic. You don't want to develop feelings for a whore and you don't want her fucked-up feelings fixating on you (see the end thought below).

Here's a different thought: It would seem better for a man to wear a wedding ring, lie and say that he's married - then have his mistress act as a girlfriend "when he's in town" every 2-6 weeks. There is no "why haven't you called" whining, there's no real expectations beyond fun for the both of you. Give a simple "don't ask" for potentially tricky questions. I have the feeling that this is a very common situation. "A different girl in every city."

So there's my take on the Girlfriend Experience: overall it's damned dangerous. It's also an indictment of society that men are having to pay for this.

End thought: Remember the girl who offered the $1,500 a night full GFE? She had a boyfriend who she did not automatically give that experience to. Cooking? Cuddling? Happy to be around him all the time? Not on your life. Very happy to provide that sort of thing to a man who paid $$$ for it - she did it every week or two for clients. Not the slightest interest in doing it for her real-life "boyfriend" even once.

So don't date a prostitute or stripper. Seriously. Don't invite that emotional mess into your life. Don't get emotionally tangled with her and don't risk her getting emotionally tangled with you. Hopefully you'll never see or experience the result.

Jessica Valenti - Male Tears

Okay, sometimes I'm bloody slow to "get it". Guess you learn something new every day.

So JB gave Jessica Valenti a mild slapping upside the head, which I commented on here.

Then this morning, it suddenly clicked to me: "Male Tears". Duh, fuckwit, "the eye that cries when most pleased" - aka a penis aka semen.

So I double-checked on Urban Dictionary for Male Tears: yep, it's slang for semen.

It's a sub-rosa call-out of: "I do oral", "I'm into bukkake", "I want a pearl necklace".

If you want a pure example of "ignore what I say and look at what I do" - here is Feminism's poster-child. Hell, her mouth is wide open in that "insert cock here" position for the next playa.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Sub-Rosa Prostitution

UncleBob has an interesting post about something that I've seen doing the rounds recently:

Bachelor Nation: 70% of men aged 20-34 are not married

I haven't bothered to post on it myself. Too much of a rehash of old information - and I hate repeating myself too much. It makes me worry that I'm treating people as if they were subnormal when you definitely aren't.

However, while I was reading it again - something occurred to me. I posted it in UncleBob's comments, here it is quoted:

New Report: 48% of First Children Born to Unwed Mothers

That is from 2013. Given that this somehow made it to the mainstream news back then, we can pretty-much figure that it was underreported at the time - the media does toe the line about some things. It being 2 years on, I do not for an instant believe that it is under 50% now.

These single mommies are whores, pure and simple. No, they may not get paid directly and upfront for their bodies in a simplistic transaction: no $100 love you long time here. They must maintain plausible deniability.

Instead they expect to be paid sub-rosa in the coin of: dinners, drinks, nights out, romantic escapes, vacations, and "I've come up a little short for X bill, can you help me?" With a guilty look on her face.

When they get knocked up: government handouts and child-support, plus moral validation and ego-stroking for being a brave, battling single mommy. This appears to be the lifestyle of the modern long-term whore. There is no surprise that 70% of younger men are not married.

I find it bleakly amusing and ironic the furor about prostitution, in the face of this sub-rosa and very profitable long-term prostitution. The sub-rosa whores are upset about the more honest and upfront whores. If the men start using the more honest and upfront whores, the sub-rosa whores lose out.

I begin to think that the whole bushwa about how women "can't find a man" and the decline of men, etc is nothing more than a smokescreen. If a woman really wants a man and marriage - she'd get it. By throwing up a smokescreen and shedding crocodile tears they can maintain plausible deniability, play the victim card, <i>and</i> get their sub-rosa prostitution game-plan all at the same time.

Plus, women love any excuse for drama and bitching.

Think it over, If this is the unconscious MO of modern women - and it actually looks somewhat plausible - then society is in for one helluva shakeup if/when that knowledge goes mainstream.

Remember: this doesn't have to be a conscious thing. On the surface can be honest Female Best Intentions. Underneath that layer is Female Doublethink and Self-Deceit. Plus there's the hidden Lies Women Tell Themselves so that they can live with their actions without slitting their own wrists (or accidentally giving away the game to men).

So, am I seriously thinking that there is some overarching conspiracy of people (women and mangina's) setting this up? No. As I said once before, I don't believe in that tinfoil hat crap. It's more likely that three selfish bastards named Tom, Dick, and Harry are taking advantage of the situation that they see to make a buck. With women as a whole going along with it because it's nice and "it's for the children" (underneath the doublethought is: "I can benefit from this if I get unlucky", which is only a short step to go to a full-on "I'm going to take advantage of this").

So back to that comment: hmmm. It's got a kind of creepy plausibility to it. Unconscious. Sub-rosa. A little bit of selfish doublethink going through the heads of many, many million women - and it actually looks kinda possible.

It might actually be something that's kinda happening, accidentally coming into being, by a strange default. While we are turning our backs on women, and the PUAs are fuck'n'chucking women, and the MRAs are trying to make things "fairer" with regards to women. The MRAs especially might want to have a close look at the possible path they may end up going down.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Women are the Losers

There is a well-remarked-upon propensity for women to fuck bad-boy losers and then try to get decent, reliable men to keep them and their hellspawn offspring going through their drying-up years. Only to frivorce said decent, reliable men for cash and prizes, followed by another delusional ride on the pony-express as the last drops of juice are squeezed out of them.

Then she has her infantile tantrum after being squeezed dry, the major refrains being: "All men are pigs!" and "Why can't I find a good maaaaan!" Gotta love the mental gymnastics required for that one.

Of course, the rational young man's choice is to fuck'n'chuck these raging pieces of shit (as commentor RmaxgenactivePUA calls them - I must agree). Others promote the same lifestyle and making absolutely certain that you get something from it, like A. V. Yader over on Return of Kings:

How To Get Women To Pay For Stuff And Buy You Presents

He even states that women are morons and losers. I have to agree: what kind of fuckwit would do what she is doing? Someone who is damaged beyond repair both mentally and emotionally (never mind her looks, those go with time - and are definitely not any indication of a quality woman):

...at the end of the day, there are only two types of men that women will spend their money on - winners and losers.

He goes on to say about women paying for winners and losers shit:

Guys in the middle will sit back and observe this with bewilderment and say to themselves, “Man, I would treat her so good, I would do anything for her, yet she’s with this piece of shit who barely works and treats her poorly, she should be with me instead!”

Those men are right. In an ideal world, these women would be with them instead, but the problem lies with the fact that women are fucking morons - that’s the most accurate description I can think of for them. Any decent looking woman knows that she can have a good man at the drop of a hat if she desires; she’s fully aware that she could have a guy that would treat her well and go to the ends of the earth to make her happy.

And you know what? She fucking hates that guy. She hates the good man because he’s nothing more than a man in the middle, and being a man in the middle will never suffice for the average vagina-bearing shit-for-brains airhead running around America, I’m sorry to report.

You know what? He's totally right. These women are morons. Utter fucking morons. You might as well take advantage of the brain-dead cute little romping cunts because what the fuck, there's nothing else out there worth sticking your dick into. Some people can't even bring themselves to get into the fuck'n'chuck process, they prefer to use their hand for whatever reasons instead.

Now, from a civilizational overview, this attitude screws the pooch. Nothing's gonna get fixed in our warped society given this fuck'n'chuck behavior.

From a rational point of view, this attitude is totally understandable. I have to applaud the PUA guys for being up-front about this - most of the rest of society are more covert. Bluntly, they're doing the best they can for themselves in one of the shittiest situations possible: being trained as a slave to take care of a used-up whore until they die, managing to break that conditioning, looking around, and realizing that they're fucked.

There is no way they're individually going to make the slightest bit of difference to this shit-sandwich. Plus there is nothing for them in the situation as-is (they may even have had their dreams killed - extremely painful, I know that the death of mine was). The only way to change this situation would be some extremely radical changes socially.

So the best they can do is look after themselves and their needs, make sure they don't get caught up in the meat-grinder of the fucked-over other slave-men (don't knock that hoe up) and try to live some life of meaning for themselves.

Hell, I can even have some sympathy for the viewpoint of those men who might decide to go out there and fuck married women. Let's be honest, the chances are that if you've had sex with 10+ women in your life, you've already fucked a married woman and don't know it. Or maybe you found out afterwards. From there, in our fucked-up mess of a society, it's a small step to not really giving a shit if she's married or not.

If she's separated and not yet divorced, you're fucking a married woman. Technically and traditionally-speaking any frivorce is a flat-out fraud - so any time you've fucked a modern frivorced woman, you're fucking a married woman. Hell, if you're stupid you may even have found yourself marrying a frivorced woman, perhaps before the frivorce is final. It's been known to happen.

If you're young and horny and a married woman is the type to deliberately prey upon young and horny men, you probably don't have a hope of resisting. Married or not, little head don't give a shit when there's a willing vagina in sight. You might feel like crap afterwards, you might get into a shit-awful mess personally and socially, but little head don't care.

These married cunts are deliberately straying. This is because mangina's and White Knights give her the pussy-pass to do whatever she wants, never mind about the man involved. Whether someone takes advantage of it or not is their choice, ultimately it's what they can live with.

The modern women: slutting it around, chasing cock and doing stuff like the Dubai Porta Potties chasing a buck.

What's the chance of getting these feral whores to voluntarily stop such destructive behavior? Nil. They're having too much fun: "It's all about meeeeeee!"

What's the solution? Beat them to a bloody pulp every time they stray? Not likely gonna happen, though that would definitely curb the more overt behavior: existential violence has a strange way of doing that to most people. The truly intransigent might be killed, a salutary lesson - and they would probably be no real loss to society and civilization as a whole. Still, it's not gonna happen: modern manginas are far too pussified to stand for any of that.

So you as a man must make the best possible compromise you can so that at least you can get through life in some semi-functional and rational manner. Whether it's being a PUA, MRA, MGTOW, what-fucking-ever. Every man does their best to cope in the best way that they can handle and live with.

Women. They ain't gonna be taken care of now - nobody with half a brain wants to get involved more than minimally with them. Fuck'n'chuck.

So this ultimately sends a harsh message for women: Too bad, so sad, there's no way to keep you in line. So good-bye, good riddance, you're gonna get used at least as harshly as you've used men in the last two-three generations. That's what fuck'n'chuck does for women: it twists her around and throws reality back in her face, harshly.

Remember that bad behavior is endemic to women everywhere: Thailand, Philippines, China, Russia, Ukraine. Partying. Divorce. Bad temper. Acting out. Slutting around. Abortions. You can't be certain of getting a high quality woman anywhere in this world. Most of the ones overseas are looking for an escape from their hell-hole.

Women: you are the biggest losers in all of this. Because of your aggregate arrogance and stupidity the wheels are coming off your gravy-train, probably for good.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and worth 10x the price.

Just Get It

Over on The Spearhead - which looks to be changing their role, finally! - one of the commentors is in the process of "getting it":

A Commenter Gets It

Unfortunately, as I have just posted there, the commentor doesn't go far enough. Since it looks like the comments are now basically not visible, here's what I just posted:

In my view Gunner451 doesn't go far enough.

These days, women expect their slave-male to bring in money plus do everything around the place, for the privilege of being around her fabulous self. Once she gets bored she frivorces him, takes as much money and stuff as possible, and screws around a while until she finds another slave-male. If she has kept herself trim then she'll probably succeed, because most men are asleep to this dynamic.

It is a blatant mindset all around us, in the media we consume, in the conversations and shaming language that women use.

"Starter marriage" - so a marriage is never expected to last? And the slave-male is supposed to be happy to hand over at least half of what he's made in the past, plus a good chunk of everything he makes in the future? For the opportunity to rut on a quasi-irregular basis with a whore who already has a child to at least one other man? After which he can live happily ever after hand-to-mouth, with the joyful memories of having once screwed the whore he now pays on an ongoing basis?

This is not equality, this is a power-grab disguised as pandering to the "victim" of a non-existent "patriarchy". A hateful "patriarchy" which was invented by women so that they could take power by proxy, through their slave-male. Now there is the women's perception of there being no need for the slave-male intermediary, thus the overt taking of management and governing roles.

This relegates the slave-male intermediary to the periphery of getting the raw materials to manufacture the stuff that the women want. Relegating these slave-males to the lower-tier women that might be available and interested. What, men are materialistic? Men think only about money and suchlike? It ain't men who're buying 100+ pair of goddamn shoes.

I know a woman who has 100 pair of shoes - she recently separated from her slave-male. She's going around having a bit of fun, while doing the whole *poke* *jab* *snipe* nasty stuff with her ex-slave-male. The man designs and helps build roads, bridges, buildings, factories - she's the manager of a goddamn pet shop. But she's bored and is getting half his prior sweat plus ongoing support plus a bunch of passive-aggressive fun by making snippy little remarks at her ex.

As I said to him: "This is not cool man. She's gone. She has no right to open her f'n mouth and pull that shit. If it was me I'd have shoved my boot so far up her ass that she'd be choking on the boot-sole by now." Unfortunately he's too much of a f'n pussy to stand up to her.

Another man I know had a woman shack up with him - he helped put her through university training - then she walked once she graduated. Is there a more blatant example of a whore using a slave-male until she decides that she's done with him? Short of marrying him, which wasn't gonna happen, she left once there was something - anything - better on the horizon.

There is no "equality" with that mentality. There is just: "me slave-owner, you slave, ooooooh that guy is sooooo sexy - bye-bye fool!"

The West is not a male-dominated society. We are a female-dominated society with a slave mentality indoctrinated into the men. Anyone who cannot see that, starkly and clearly, needs a set of glasses from the movie "They Live". It is no surprise that Islam is eating our lunch.

There is no fucking equality. There never was. There never will be. Only complete economic collapse will have a hope of resetting the West's fucked-up social system back to something like what we want it to be.

It is no surprise that Islam is eating our lunch. At least a Man can fucking feel like a Man under a system like Islam, rather than a fucking slave-male.

Brought to you by the movie "They Live" and Crap Colored Glasses™ - cheap at ten times the price.

(No, I don't like Islam particularly. Go learn about it, if you want to figure out what sort of fucked-up system it is. In a nutshell it relies upon a second-class-citizen caste-system and conquest/expansion for the money to survive - if you're a Muslim you have no taxes to pay, period.)

Black and White and Shades of Grey

Everything in black and white, good and bad, Alpha and Beta, madonna and whore. Everything taken to extremes.

This is life these days, always taken to the maximum, dialectic up to eleven, balls to the fucking wall, taken 2XS.

The reality is not the extremes, not the dichomy, not the paradox. The Alpha sees woman as Whore, the Beta sees woman as Madonna. The Beta is supposed to be deluded, the Alpha is supposed to see reality.

Woman on a pedestal, feet to be kissed. Woman a gold digging slut, whore that'll jump ship at any opportunity, who will fuck anything at the drop of a hat.

One is supposedly right, the other supposedly wrong, yet are they both deluded?

Perhaps the reality is different. Madonna, whore, hell with that noise - maybe the real reality is the playmate.