Here is a delicious picture of a promiscuous woman, unashamedly stolen from the Chateau - don't the two comments make you smile?
"Please bring references and last 3 pay statements."
"I'm sure they are looking for mature men. an immature man is probablt what made them a single mother."
For my money though, the best comment about this goes to Laguna Beach Fogey:
Now just think about that statement for a minute. Heartiste states that the girl has the "thousand cock stare", LBF talks about "moisture".
Looking at her - those eyes are cold and hard, distant, calculating. The eyes of a whore looking at a mark. That smile is a close-lipped rictus. Her skin does have some kind of oily, greasy sheen to it. Overall she looks jaded and well-used.
This is the look of a slut who has hit the wall, desperately looking to cash out of the game. The fact that she's on the "singleparentmeet.com" dating site is a serious warning flag: she has gone through all the men of her acquaintance and they aren't stupid enough to put a ring on it.
We can imagine where this slut got her starter-experience (h/t Researchers Map The Sexual Network of an Entire High School):
Probably the girl who had 5 guys in the bottom-left or 6 guys in the upper-right. Though the upper-right also has another possibility, with the girl who had 4 guys and 1 girl. The "ring" at the top-left has quite a few girls who have had 3-4 guys.
This network map is within a 6 month period of high school, btw. Father's, never send your daughter's to high school.
There is also a serious 'playa in the making' in the upper left quadrant. Nine girls in 6 months? Now tell me that women shun what they call 'mansluts'... Nuh, uh. Care to make a guess what he does besides banging his groupies?
ReplyDeleteBesides, it's a shame that celibate teens are not shown at all. Or perhaps there are none? *smirk*
"Slightly more than half of all students reported having sexual intercourse, a rate comparable to the national average. The researchers mapped the network structure of the 573 students involved in a romantic or sexual relationship."
DeleteFound the answer.
And it was 18 months, not 6. Less of a 'playa', but still impressive.
DeleteOkay, that's twice it's eaten my comments. Bloody Google Chrome!
ReplyDeleteAt any rate: while the full duration of the study was 18 months, this was 6 months. The picture is of a 6-month subset of the data, read the caption at the bottom.
We must remember that many sex acts don't count to a girl, so a lot of data probably wasn't included because of lack of confirming data. Few girls are going to admit to taking the football team on in her Gang-Bang-Barbie or getting involved in groupsex/orgies.
Likewise, I'm not surprised that there was only one lesbian encounter reported.
Thanks for correcting my error.
DeleteI am using a Chromium variant called Comodo Dragon. This extension has solved my problems with eaten comments.
Welcome Mindstorm. I figured out my problem though: had to tell Chrome to allow 3rd-party cookies, then it will let me reply as myself. Must dig in deeper into the security settings, I'm a Chrome newbie.
DeleteWere you using Firefox before? Well, you didn't have to switch to Chrome. There are also various Firefox clones available *cough* Icefox *cough* for people boycotting Mozilla.
DeleteOr IceDragon, if you are not allergic to proprietary software.
DeleteI was using IE11 bleh - constant whining from google about it not being supported, plus any time I did a post it ended up messed up.
DeleteChrome is highly customizable as of late. Have you included the most often used extensions to make it better serve your needs? I found this one very useful, as it makes most webpages 'easier on the eyes' for me. AdBlock Plus, JS Popup Blocker, and AutoPager are also very good.
DeleteCorrection: AutoPager is discontinued for Chrome. I have replaced it with Autopagerize.
DeleteI would also recommend TamperMonkey if userscripts.org weren't down for some time. TamperMonkey (or GreaseMonkey for FF) is useless without scripts to run.
DeleteI've used GreaseMonkey for other things. In the end they were of limited use for my purposes.
DeleteAt any rate, I'm getting more used to Chrome now. Will see how it holds up or if it drives me nuts.
Another feature of the graph. You might say that 'like attracts like' to some extent. In the 'carousel' section nodes with many links generally are grouped next to each other.
ReplyDeleteYes indeed.
DeleteFrom a societal point of view, it is interesting to notice the 63 monogamous couples at the bottom-right. As for the other chains and Y's and V's, it's not unusual to end up having a couple of goes to find "the right one for me".
In the circle-jerk at the top left there are still what appear to be quite a few who have only tried one person in the mess. Of course that could simply be someone having one or two people on-tap. A poor choice of mates, in any case.
It's only half a year. How many years are there in HS? Three, I guess. "For each partner above one, add another one every 6 months." - my guesstimate.
DeleteScary, isn't it.
DeleteOr if you go by the Manosphere rule-of-thumb: for every one reported, there are two others not reported and another 7 sexual acts that "don't count".