I bring excellent news for all teh wimminz and cuck-cucks out there, this time from the computer security division of life.
It seems that I am very far behind the curve on this one: the trend to control your sex-toys via low-power (and insecure) Bluetooth technology. What's pictured is the discreet anal version for teh wimminz to use, controllable through their smartphone.
Or maybe through their partner's smartphone, as a variation on sex-fun-play.
According to Bleeping Computer, the security researchers did a wardriving test in San Francisco (they don't say if it was night or day) and found several people who were wearing theirs. Here was where they did the test (looks to be residential):
Given the inherent insecurity of these things, I can imagine the practical joke of the future. At work, triangulate in and find one of your more sexualized female workmates with one of these...wait until she goes into a meeting...dial it up to eleven...watch the hilarity ensue...
Go to a bar, similar...
A sex-toy party, where the female guests are expecting to be randomly stimulated by all and sundry at whim...
Hook some of these up to the internet for random people to "bid" on - highest bidder gets to stimulate the woman involved and watch her reaction via webcam...a variation on voyeurism...
Of course, never forget rule #36 - if it exists, there is porn of it. Perhaps some even home-grown, along the lines of revenge-porn...
You could probably make this into "the ultimate cuck" for the types who like a combination of public-sex and being cuckolded:
Him: "Hi honey, how did it go today at work?"
Her: "It was awesome, I got randomly stimulated fifteen times today!"
Him: "Ohhhhh that makes me so horny..."
Meh. What next? Open fucking in the streets? And there's still one helluva lot lower that we can go, you betcha.
A humorous look at the weird sexual perversions of humanity - brought to you by Crap-Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.
Eyes, balls, brains - all here and accounted for. Hold on tight, we're about to rip the guts straight out of Feminism and the entire gynocentric society we live in.
Sexbots, sex dolls, you-name-it, it's getting better.
In the past, I've written about the general cost of pussy and if it's actually worth it. (Synopsis: nope.)
Now that sex dolls and sexbots are becoming more affordable - and men are becoming less worried about what teh wimminz think socially - things are changing out there.
Before, I wrote of two generally-broad paths:
* marriage and kids and all that, costing you something like $1.3 million dollars over 20 years (more if you get divorce-raped)
...vs...
* bringing in $2 million dollars over 20 years (and spending $200k of that on a variety of whores)
There is now another path coming "out of the closet" as it were.
The sex dolls (now) and sexbots (to come).
Back on my post re "is that pussy worth it?" linked above, I stated that a man can earn $100k a year and spend about $10k a year on a variety of decent-quality (young) whores. End result is $90k a year in his pocket.
You can get a quite realistic sex doll for under $3k.
The very, very interesting thing though - it gets better. Way, way better, when it comes to the comparison of whores vs sex dolls.
You see, there are already whorehouses in asia that have sex dolls rather than whores. The Japanese have their love doll brothels. In Barcelona a whorehouse has opened that has sex dolls instead of whores. There is a Dublin whorehouse that rents out a sex doll for 100 euro per hour.
This tells me three things:
1/ Men prefer fucking a whore rather than having a modern "wife".
2/ Men prefer fucking a doll rather than fucking a whore.
3/ Whores are such a fucking pain in the ass that even brothel owners want to be rid of them.
I shit you not about #3 there. Even 30 years ago (before I drank the kool-aid and married a BPD/NPD woman) I knew that brothels were damned harsh with their whores. Many of them were (and still are, something else that I experienced 3-4 years ago) stuck-up cunts who don't live in reality. Brothels know better - they want satisfied, repeat customers! (Ditto for strip-clubs.)
So for a brothel, a good chunk of the "take" goes to the girl involved. Plus making sure that she stays clean, gets checked regularly, doesn't fuck off the customers, etc.
In comparison, a doll is a one-off purchase that merely requires maintenance after each usage. Customers who damage a doll pay for it out of their pocket.
No cunty personality to deal with. No hassles keeping them clean and checked. No scrambling because someone is on the rag or is in a state 'cause their boyfriend found out what they actually do for a living. Keep most of the money. Customers are guaranteed happier 'cause the whores ain't jacking 'em around.
This is a definite win-win-win fuckin' situation for the brothel-owner.
It's also a damn good win-win-win situation for a man with the space to buy his own sex doll rather than rent one out for a time.
Over 3 years time, a man can get a "stable" of 3 different sex-dolls (each with their own hair/eyes/other accessories) for about $10k all up (including maintenance for those 3 years).
That's much better than $30k for a variety of whores over that time-period. Plus dealing with whatever weird-ass attitudes and the risk of STDs that they bring into your life. (Yes, you pay them to go away once you're done.)
With the AI that they're working on these days - talking sex dolls - memory - responses - moaning when you do certain things (built-in sensors) - you get the picture. It's getting more...
...real.
In a doll-like, puppet-like, controlling manner. You get what you want, which is sex and silence.
This is 2017. By 2030, I suspect that these sex dolls might be coming very, very close to full-on sexbots.
If in 2030 you spend $20k on a very high-end sexbot - one that's actually useful in ways other than simply poking it with your dick - then you are far ahead of the game even when it comes to whores and sex dolls. You actually have something that both:
a/ brings pleasure
b/ makes your life easier
It looks like in that 13-year time-period, the vagina will be ripped right out of the "oldest profession". It will cease to exist. Plus, a man who follows this path is going to have at least $100k in pocket, saved cash, to pick-and-choose his new companion. Why only one?
That's going to utterly gut feminism and the modern strong, empowered wimminz. You will work - period. You will not marry - no man will want you. You will be just another cog in the work-sleep-consumption cycle of our eternal-slavery civilization.
A civilization where actually being interested in fucking a woman will be an extremely rare surprise and validation of her existence. Rare as hen's teeth and unicorn blood.
I would not be surprised if it becomes normal to be having sex with dolls and robots. Just look at the porn industry - razorblade manufacturers wanted to sell more product, so porn stars started shaving their privates. That sub-rosa message caught on and most women (and many men) are shaved. The same type of sub-rosa message could similarly be done to benefit the sexbot industry.
Poor feminists. Caught in the grinder of not needing a man, being able to do it all for themselves, and then even their vagina's literally being made worthless.
We have a ringside seat to this trainwreck.
A small sense of surprised and pleased schadenfreude - tonight, now, I will have a small glass of Grand Marnier. Something that I've not had in quite some time.
It is worth listening to, simply to understand the thinking of most of these women. This includes all women - Gen X, Gen Y, the Millennials, and the generation that is being brought up right now.
The brainwashing is real.
The worthlessness is real.
Do not feel bad for these arrogant and moronic retards.
So even though I'm a MGTOW, as Aaron says, I do keep a line open. Not jumping at the retards though. They're too stupid to be attractive. "I have a bag" - yeah. Wonderfully attractive. Enjoy their misery as they go through life and shake your head at their stupidity and do your own thing.
So stepping back - where does this stupidity begin?
Right from the beginning. Feminism and leftism and stupid education. Brainwashing. When the lure of a piece of paper is more important to these retards than bearing children and having a stable life and home.
You can think about it in this manner - there are three types of women in this world.
Slut: pick her up in a bar, fuck her, throw her out when you're done. Whores fall into this category and are more honest about the whole process. It's just a cum dumpster.
Fucktoy: may start or meet as a slut, fuck her every week or two. She's the type in a PUAs rotation. Call her to ask what's up, tell her to bring the movies, let her out when she's done. Mistresses fall into this category. Just a slightly updated cum dumpster that you're a little more pleasant towards.
Girlfriend: you definitely won't meet her as a slut or fucktoy. The J.O.B. isn't about the piece of paper or the handbag or whatever. The J.O.B. is simply to keep her alive and going until she finds the right man. She is your genuine unicorn aka NAWALT, and as I've written you might run across a couple of these in your lifetime. If you didn't find her when you were young - too bad.
Special note: a divorced woman or single mommy is in the slut/fucktoy category. Not the girlfriend category. A proper girlfriend category will not play the field or detonate her nice, happy life just for the chance to jump some other cock.
So, where the stupidity begins. Brainwashing at the modern schools coupled with overwhelmingly stupid peer-pressure from the retarded other wimminz around them all.
See the world around you now. Back in my day, kids started experimenting sexually at 11-12yo. It's simply human nature and curiosity. This sexual promiscuity starts naturally young. When harnessed and yoked it built Western society.
Now there is not really much to strive for (whether because sex is too easy to get or the women aren't worth having) and many young men are simply checking out of the process of Western society. Which is why we are in decline. Even I have pretty-much checked out, having given up on owning my own business, having given up on making loads of money.
There is flat-out no point when there is no woman worth having and it's getting too late to start having children anyway.
Going back to the harnessing and yoking of human sexuality to build Western society. Camille Paglia and her comment: If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.
Civilization is going back into female hands. We are in the process of going back into grass huts.
Sexual liberation. Mandatory sex education in schools. Mandatory drug education in schools.
So as I've written, some 20-30 years ago I knew a girl who started as a whore as a 12yo. Vaginal, anal, oral, protected and unprotected, no problems. No standards, it's all about the money honey. By the time she was a 17yo she was fat and past it and had a drug problem. That's 5 years as a whore, good money coming in, life barely started and she's already gone. It went out as fast as it came in.
Some 20 years ago I knew a girl who started having sex as an 11yo. She caught an STD and became sterile. Once she was a 14yo her mentality was: "Yay! I'm now legal!" No money coming in, life not even started, and she's way past gone. Already through the grinder and a biological and evolutionary dead-end. Attractive as fuck? So damn what? A dead-end.
Stupidity.
Lack of standards.
These days it's worse. In schools, children under 10yo are being taught the various flavors of sexuality. LGBTQ-what-fucking-ever. Sensitivity training. Special toilets just for those who identify internally as what they aren't actually in a biological sense.
A know a girl who is basically tattoo'd trash. She has an 8yo son. He has a little female friend. "Don't worry mummy, I won't leave you. I'm still a homo." A fucking 8yo boy who has been brainwashed already to be/think that he's a homo. She just loves-loves-loooooves her little bear. (In literally those nauseatingly gushing terms, vomited all over facecrap.)
Take a modern girl-child at 10yo. Look at her. Then look at a modern 40yo Gen-X woman.
I actually have vastly more respect for a Gen-X woman who honestly tells me that she has had something like 20 different men in her life.
Because I know that by the time that 10yo reaches 15-18yo, she'll have taken 20 different men up her ass. That's just up her ass. More men than that in other sexual ways - vaginal, oral, hand, tit-fucking, group, bukkake, etc.
"But wait, BPS! All 10yo's? You're kidding, right?"
Probably not all, no. A vast number, though. There will be the occasional unicorn/NAWALT. There are the occasional girls who won't fall to the bullshit and brainwashing and peer-pressure. Don't hold your breath.
That whore. That sterile girl. Mentally dysfunctional. Fucked in the head. Emotional messes. The whore, if she is still alive, might have a child - also fucked in the head. Because most single mommies pass that down to their children. A whore with a drug problem? Yeah, right, that kid isn't going to have an emotionally stable upbringing.
We are more than tolerating this insanity. We are actively training and breeding for it. "You go girl." Going back to the grass huts, where the morons fuck around and drama and horseshit is the end-all of life, and the lazy-yet-attractive men are the only ones who have kids.
Getting worse. She haz a handbag. Ooohh, yippee fuckin' skip, how fuckin' exciting and meaningful her life iz.
What can you do?
A bleak look through Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.
==========================
Some extra attic salt.
That 10yo would do vastly better in life if she were groomed for one special (older) man as a wife. Which they used to do, when they married girls off before 15 if at all possible.
But then, that's why they used to marry young girls off early, didn't they? None of this nicey-nicey feelgood crap about human sexuality and reality. They knew the score.
I've been spending a bit of time wandering through Auckland CBD recently. (Also doing some mountain climbing - I won't say where, I will simply say that it was cold and difficult and awesome and I'm stupid enough to think about doing it yet again.)
Around Auckland city there are a lot of poster-stickers put up on several light poles and the signal poles and etc. Their message: "There are over 20,000 children with fathers in prison." (I should have taken a photo. Here's a link to the STUFF news page about it: Maori prisoners children forgotten.)
So this is an outrage, of course. Everyone is up in arms about it, "the Government agencies are failing the children of Maori prisoners". Cue manufactured alarm (as expected from the leftist media where "if it bleeds, it leads" and "bad news sells"). In the link above, there is a lot of bleeding-heart "the poor, poor dears" bullshit.
So reading about it, it's a lot to do with lower-income families. Which of course, you would expect - in New Zealand, childhood poverty has risen from 15% to 29% between 1984 and 2012.
There's definitely a lot of teh wimminz fucking up their most important decision in life:
What is the most important decision that any woman can make in her entire life?
Children.
Who she has them with. When she has them. Where she has them. How she has them. Why she has them.
Yet a large % of women and her parents are fucking this up.
As David Aurini commented on the above post:
"Child Poverty" is a misnomer; children don't make incomes. Parental poverty is the problem - and it's pretty bloody clear that their poverty mainly stems from poor choices.
Of course, it is extremely un-PC to point this out. Teh wimminz make poor choices? Blasphemy! Teh golden vagina iz infallible and worth more than any mere man!
Pull the other one, it plays Judas fucking Priest. (Which reminds me: time to go listen to British Steel again.)
So the real problem, to anyone who isn't a retarded leftist moron and brainwashed slave of teh wimminz, is that the momma chooses to fuck men who are criminals. Plus pumping out sproglet after sproglet from said criminal and his ilk (because there's currently a bit over 9,000 prisoners in New Zealand as of December 2016, and they aren't all Maori).
The fact that this is fucking stupid behavior is not a concern to the bleeding heart stupid fucktards going around and bleating in herds. No. To them, this sexually liberated behavior is the new normal - in fact, to be celebrated.
Thankfully we haven't fallen this far, to the point where generations of incest is normal. Not widespread. Not yet. Though I have heard about a town in NZ with multiple generations of drugs and incest...
Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.
Speaking of Judas Priest, here's a classic song from British Steel:
You don't have to be old to be wise. You simply need to look at reality, be prepared to see it how it is, without the rose-colored glasses and fru-fru brainwashing.
Time to rip the leftists and wimminz a new one. Sadly, they will not cry at this - instead they will simply cover their ears and chant "lalalala I can't hear you lalalala" at the top of their lungs. This is because they are utterly incapable of learning anything - due to their brains being a safe missing the key and welded up that has been set into a 100x100x100 meter block of concrete dropped into the remotest part of the Challenger Deep...
So on the Washington Examiner, I see that the state of California Californication has supposedly legalized child prostitution.
Beginning on Jan 1, prostitution by minors will be legal in California. Yes, you read that right.
Hmm. Sounds like fuckin' horseshit to me. Dig a bit further - it turns out that the end result might have similar effects to having made some things legal. In that, the police will no longer be able to arrest (or prosecute) the underage for selling their bodies:
SB1322 bars law enforcement from arresting sex workers who are under the age of 18 for soliciting or engaging in prostitution, or loitering with the intent to do so. So teenage girls (and boys) in California will soon be free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution.
The Democratic governor announced he signed SB1322 to ban police from charging people under the age of 18 with prostitution.
Interesting.
This does not, however, mean that child prostitution is legal. It is still illegal for Californians to hire prostitutes (child or otherwise), and sex traffickers will still face consequences if they are caught prostituting children. The new law means that children involved in sex trafficking and prostitution will be treated as victims instead of criminals.
Ah. A very fine line. And that actually means?
Going back to the first link:
Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution - which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
A few notes:
1/ Note that only women and girls are mentioned, not young boys. Expected bias from a mainstream news source. They seem to think that nobody is going to be interested in sodomizing young boys - or perhaps boys getting fucked up the ass is of no concern whatsoever. /sarcasm
2/ It's not legalizing child prostitution in any form. It simply stops the police from easily getting them off the streets.
3/ Since the police can no longer get them off the streets quickly - then what? Straight back into it once the car is out of sight? "Hey mister, I'm eleven years old - want to fuck me?"
As the article states straight-up: "Minors involved in prostitution are clearly victims, and allowing our law enforcement officers to pick these minors up and get them away from their pimps and into custody is a dramatically better solution than making it legal for them to sell themselves for sex." Barring the bullshit about making it legal - the general idea for this situation seems sound, get them the hell out of the area/game asap.
No longer possible, the police just can't stop (or protect) them any more. Shades of the Rotheringham sex ring, only now it can be semi-open - not quietly ignored or swept under the carpet.
So, some simple-yet-complex questions:
a) If a pedophile gets picked up for paying an underage prostitute, can he plead guilty to paying for sex rather than having sex with a minor?
b) What about prior acts? Can they be re-pleaded as per the above, so long as the pedophile paid for it? (As being different from abduction/kidnapping/rape/whatever.)
c) What about pizzagate, with the above things in mind?
I'm rather stunned by the level of idiocy displayed by the morons who signed this into law (back in September). There's a reason that I'm going: "Wait, whut?"
'Cause while it is still not legal to pay for prostitutes of any age or sex - it looks like in the state of California it will be a helluva lot easier to find those underage prostitutes. Sure, you can probably get them off the streets, though it likely means that Social Workers Wankers rather than the police will have to become involved to do it.
Which makes me wonder at the real reasons behind this abomination of law. Every damn pedo in America looking at California and going "hmmmm" with anticipation. The Social Workers having even better job prospects, and (possibly) more powers handed to them. Perhaps even an increase in the number of police to deal specifically with the unintended fallout from this law.
Leftists and wimminz. I'd almost laugh, if it wasn't so fuckin' frightening. The feelz and intentions are more important than thinking things through thoroughly and looking at the worst of what might happen - never mind adjusting to what actually happens in reality.
For this, I have to hand it to California for the stupidity-uber-allez Darwin Award: likely turning your own leftist/SJW promised land into a smoking hellhole of sexual perversion. Way to go ya morons.
Yes, this is supposed to be a funny/insulting e-card type of thing.
Sexually, everything is weaponized, as per talking about fake eyebrows, boobs, butt, eyelashes, hair extensions, and eye color. (We can add shape to that - corsets are coming back in, if not already here.)
So this is probably going to be the final bit about how the entire mindset of interchangeable has fucked over the world - or at least Western culture. There might be a few more footnotes somewhere, however IMO this is the final trickle-down effects.
The stuff prior:
Business, cheapness causing collapse.
Business, cheapness and interchangeable causing a race to the bottom re quality and job/life insecurity.
Interchangeable sex partners.
How being interchangeable means you have no negotiation power.
And now: Relationships. (Relationshits? 'Cause relationships are about gone, the last few ships vanishing over the horizon. 'Cause there's only one fucking Captain on a ship and they can see the writing on the wall.)
What's best for your kids: a) having a reliable man around, b) having unreliable or no men around
What's the best way to keep a man around: 1) putting him first, 2) putting your kids first
When every dick and pussy is interchangeable, indistinguishable, that means that the body and personality attached is likewise interchangeable and indistinguishable. And it is viewed that way, as you can tell from teh wimminz sampling a new cock every week while Little Johnny and Little Anne are curled up in their beds in the next room - listening to mommy scream her pleasure out at high volume interspersed with phrases like "fuck me harder! fuck me in the ass! let me suck your cock! so beautiful! piss on me! oh God! I wanna lick your ass!" etc.
Both Little Johnny and Little Anne can sense it: An (a1) moment this is not.
Any rate. Like I said, looks don't mean much if you can't stand to be around her for long - or even get with her in the first place. You know exactly what I mean. Not only is her vagina rancid - her personality is rancid as well.
Rotten, shitty, crazy, infantile, contradictory, insane, entitled, moronic, childish, etc. All the mental-emotional freight (baggage grown to where it requires a train) about wimminz that is bundled together and referred to as "the hamster".
So why is this? It's because in her mind relationships are also interchangeable.
If they're all the same, why put any effort in?
To an individual relationship, or relationships in general?
So down they go, down the tubes, no effort, don't give a fuck, can't be arsed, get a shitty attitude, be crass, swear, lip off, let's have a game of you and him fight, let's play Marry Fuck Kill, ooooo this one makes me horny, hey baby wanna fuck - you get the picture. Go down the bars for six months to a year, you'll see it all and way more besides. You get to where the only way you'd hang around the girls is if you are desperate.
In the old days women had to make a helluva effort, prove their family-making skills, and put a lot of work into making a family. Five-six-seven kids, cooking, clothing, vegetable garden, preserving food, teaching, medicine, etc.
These days? Nah, why bother. There's always another guy out there looking for a root relationship. "I'm gonna get preggers and go on the DPB." Stated out loud, right in front of men: to hell with men, to hell with a husband, she'll get pregnant and suck off the government tit.
Men have wised up and are following the same path. She can't be arsed putting any effort in? Neither can he. This is probably some of the mentality behind the PUA tactic of not responding to a text for hours, maybe days. "I care less about you." "No, I care less about you." A phone call? You must be joking, nobody makes phone calls these days.
Her: (bullshit excuse/fight) ... let's just end this.
Him: Alright.
Her: (incoherent) Goddamn you, do I mean so fucking little to you that you won't even *make an attempt* to keep a relationship going?!?!!?!
Him: (shrugs and moves on)
I have done this.
Reality is that a woman will do (or not do) whatever she wants. What she says will not be what she does. She says she wants you, panting for it, naked selfies out the wazoo - then suddenly flakes. So you're sexting - and she suddenly goes silent on you. For whatever reason or none, maybe she's got some Chad Thundercock for a few weeks. She may eventually get back to you a couple months or a year later.
If she can be arsed. There's plenty of cock, men, etc out there - no need to put any effort in. Besides, she's probably a little embarrassed the way things went (or didn't) with you. Might as well avoid you, it's less painful feelz on her part.
She's like the weather, about all you can do is shake your head in bemusement and move on with your day.
A race to the bottom of not-caring. It's self-defense against going insane.
I have a mental image of Hell On Earth, from the short-novel pair Black Easter/The Day After Judgement (by James Blish). The characters are walking through a city populated with near-naked men and women. Every so often a man goes up to a random woman and has sex with her. One of the characters is a sex-maniac, was fucking a succubus prior to Judgement Day, and this had him somewhat interested for a short time - until he realizes that the men and women fucking are both utterly bored with the process.
I suppose that I should be bothered by this. You know what? I'm not.
I guess because in my opinion it's just one more indignity piled upon a once-respectable institution. At least, I used to think it was respectable. The old-old-original version was. (Is that some hint of blue pill nostalgia I detect in myself? But then, I already figured out what marriage was really for anyway.)
I've made no secret that I think Marriage 2.0+ is just about as destructive to society as it's possible to get. Some 52+% of American marriages end in divorce - according to the CDC's own statistics from 2011. Not explicitly stated, yet there if you do a little basic mathematics. That's on the low end, not all states reported statistics that year.
So people are going "whoo whoo whoo! gays can now marry!" all over FaceCrap. Gay pride picture profiles. Even the White House picture has the gay-rainbow-pride-thing going. Are these people gay? Meh. Sheep following the herd. (That's my cynicism coming out.)
In reality, the LGBTQBDSM-whatever crowd aren't going to breed. In a hundred years time they'll just be a footnote in history, annotated with: "Insane how people catered to these evolutionary dead-ends". The lefties of the future will either have to deliberately manufacture more LGBTQBDSM-whatevers through more warped social engineering, or find some new minority to hold up as an example of "the poor poor dears, let's give them a helping-hand" so they can feel good and virtuous about one thing in their vapid and empty lives.
(Don't laugh about the warped social engineering. I've stated here that it looks like they're doing their damnedest to pathologize any form of normal Male-Male bonding. They appear to be stating that all forms of Male-Male bonding are supposedly homosexual at their root, thus demonizing it, while at the same time celebrating everything LGBTQBDSM-whatever. That's warped social engineering - and thinking! - enough to put this lot into the loony-brigade in a heartbeat.)
Yet still, I don't really feel that bothered by this legalization of LGBTQBDSM-whatever marriage. It was inevitable. In a strange way I feel that it's a good thing. Because this mocks the institution of marriage even more.
This mocking makes people wake up more to the social illness going on. To how destructive Marriage 2.0+ is. To the individual and to society as a whole. Etc etc etc ad nauseum.
More unmarried modern whores will be crying alone at the end of their lives. "Why can't I find a good maaaan?" Funny you should ask that...
This brouhaha makes me feel sorry for the people who have genuinely good heterosexual marriages and pride themselves on that. Yes, there are a few out there. Good on you. There are some NAWALTs, as we put it in the Manosphere - snapped up and taken off the market when young. These are married to what I consider the true Alpha's and Beta's, as per BoneCrkr's definition.
I hope that it doesn't gall you too much that the mentally-fucked-up managed to get the "right" to non-breed-but-fake-it. Civil union and de-facto relationships were not enough for them - they wanted the whole enchilada. They agitated. They got it.
The rest of us...those of us who chose poorly, who still have the option of choosing wisely again...we're stuck trying to find gold, in a toxic pool of far-less-than-ideal-women. That's those who really want to try again. Many of us got our frivorce already, others realize that theirs' is ahead of them and coming on fast. Some of us won't be going down that Marriage 2.0+ path again, or any time soon, for various reasons.
I do wonder if the LGBTQBDSM-whatever brigade have a clue as to what they've really let themselves in for. Studies show that breakups are even more common in their sector of society, moreso in the situation of lesbian relationships.
Which brings up a superficially-amusing thought: in the case of frivorce, which one is the woman who gets alimony from her partner?
===============================
In the end, what bothers me more in this world is this (unashamedly stolen from Return of Kings, commenting about social media):
There is massive Societal Programming that states that the lives of men are somehow worth less than those of women and children. When a ship or plane is sinking at sea, women and children are shuttled off first. If they run out of lifeboats, us guys are supposed to suck it up and die.
Women didn’t invent this stupidity. MEN did. Women also don’t, as a rule, propagate this stupidity. MEN do, including both left-wing beta male white knights and even many right-wing Alpha Male 1.0s.
The sad reality is that the majority of men in modern day society actually support anti-man Societal Programming. I wish this was not the case, but it is. If men supported men just as much as they supported women, what happened in that video would never have occurred. Men wouldn’t be paying alimony or be barred from seeing their own kids either.
Based on my own educated guesses of reading the stats, about 70% of men in today’s Western world are beta males. “Beta” is a range of course; some of these 70% are extreme, hopeless pussies and others are somewhat confident betas, but they’re still beta.
These men go along with just about all of this anti-man, woman-empowerment stuff. They laugh at all those commercials that show husbands and boyfriends as stupid buffoons. They think alimony is a good idea, or at least don’t question it. They agree with videos like this. They make hundreds of “OMG you’re so beautiful!” comments on every pic a girl posts on Facebook or Instagram. They turn into whiny bitches when women dump them.
And so the cycle continues.
From Didact's thoughts on this:
As explanations go, it's not a bad one. Blackdragon is entirely correct to lay most of the blame for Western society's currently FUBARd state at the feet of Western men. As he rightly points out, if Western men simply refused to get married and thereby stopped feeding the alimony machine that gives women every possible incentive to screw them and their men over, the entire system would collapse in on itself overnight. The reason it doesn't collapse, he contends, is because men are programmed to belittle the worth of other men.
There's just one little problem with this argument, and it's a big one. (Yes, that was intentional. Haven't you ever watched Futurama?)
Blackdragon missed, by a very wide margin, the real reason why men generally do not hold other men's lives in particularly high esteem. He simply did not bother to account for the fact that, in reproductive terms, men actually are not worth very much.
Strangely enough, I think that they've both missed an important point. It's not necessarily that it's anti-man societal programming. It's not necessarily that it's because men are programmed to belittle the worth of other men.
It's that men compete with other men for pussy. Period.
Sure, we've been conditioned to the "women are good, men are bad" mindset. It laces every aspect of society from birth on upwards. Commercials. Sitcoms. Romances. You name it. The woman is the prize. She has the golden vagina. She gets to stand on the pedestal and dangle her privates in your face.
When a man gets cut down socially, taken down a peg or two dozen, then that makes other men look good in comparison. Especially if it's done by a woman. His worthlessness in comparison makes their worth in comparison sky-high.
You see this competition everywhere. Even in the PUAsphere. Alpha Male Out-Gaming (AMOG-ing). Boyfriend Destroying. Hell, even in the Manosphere with the deliberate (mis)characterization of all MGTOW being losers who can't get laid.
Cut down the other man's social worth, it makes you look good in comparison. If you can do it plausibly-deniably the better. Into the bargain, you are also showing off your social worth in chick terms as being higher than his.
Bros before hoes? Not when it comes to getting dick into pussy. As exemplified in many cases. Hell, Style/Strauss was doing this when attempting to steal girls from his fellow-PUAs. (In The Game and the very-long linked Rawness post.)
Broken, entirely. You might find one or two Men who would not stand around picking their nose if a girl spiked your drink. They have your back. The only ones who ever would, true friends you can take to the bank.
The rest are fair-weather friends at best - only until she dangles her privates in his face.
Turd Flinging Monkey has an interesting video about how war (in the form of killing off men) causes cycling between Matriarchy and Patriarchy:
In there is also a mention of future technology possibly making women obsolete, and how that might change society to a Patriarchy. On the whole quite thought-provoking.
This might explain a part of the claimed statistic that only 40% of Men throughout history have reproduced (worked out from DNA sampling if I recall correctly). The other 60% of men have been either killed off or cuckolded, never breeding.
It sure as hell sells a lot of shit in this world.
Whether it's the mate-attracting/guarding/nesting behavior of men (flash cars, flash clothing, flash houses, etc - look, I got money!).
Whether it's the mate-guarding behavior of women (designer purses - look, I/my man got money!), or mate-attracting behavior of women (clothing - or nominally so - seen today walking down the street).
Today's was a good one. It being winter here in New Zealand, people walking out in the open are generally bundled up warm.
Only superficially so for this predator on the prowl though. Fur-trimmed leather-like jacket (all fake of course), short-short-short skirt, and knee-length fuck-me-fuck-me-fuck-me boots.
Wait. I forgot the stockings. Probably fairly hefty thickness, with patchy-style stripes. Designed to attract attention to the legs, of course. Wow, those legs are attractive!
Of course, she was "vivacious". Which is an old-time word meaning basically "out there" - as in voice, body-language, facial expression, etc.Women get that way when they get the attention they crave and/or seek more of the same.
"Look at meeee!"
Coupled with "that strut". You know the one I'm talking about. The one that says "I'm a whore on the prowl - you think you got what it takes to fuck me?"
Yes, we know what you're selling.
While it looks good, we know it's been ridden hard and then put back on the shelf by several guys.
Moment I laid eyes on her, one thing jumped straight into mind. Looks and flashy, completely trashy.
Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.
Attributed to many people, and with many variations. The so-called "red pill" has been out there for a long time, it's just the pussified modern men have been browbeaten down to not passing timeless wisdom like this on to the next generation. How society has been moulded by the feminist narrative!
This one's attributed to George Bernard Shaw.
George Bernard Shaw was on a train one morning, reading his paper. After a while he looks up from his paper and says to the girl in the cabin: "If I gave you a hundred thousand pounds, would you sleep with me?"
Girl: "Yes, I would."
GBS: "Hmmmm." He goes back to his paper again.
After a few minutes, he looks up from the paper to the girl: "If I gave you ten pounds, would you sleep with me?"
Girl fumes: "What kind of girl do you think I am?"
GBS: "We've already established that. Now we're just negotiating the price."
Men always knew that women were like that. The dictates of "nice" society be damned.
I'm looking forward to seeing what drivel that the female-driven media will come out with, after this Valentine's Day.
Remember: the 50 Shades of Grey movie is released this vayjayjay day. You know all the feminists will be wanting to watch it, for their tingles and dripping. BDSM-lite, just the (safe) way that they want it.
Mmmmm I live in New Zealand. One day ahead of the rest of the world. Perhaps I should go troll these femi-whores, walk down the street in my suit and see what they come out with. Or maybe the bars. Would be fuckin' amusing to see how many girls are out there trawling for a Christian Grey for the night, after getting wet at the movies.
Time for a sip of Grand Marnier, in anticipation of the show.
One of the commenters drops a few words of brutal honesty into the discussion:
Dear Isabel
I spent twenty years trying to be nice to women like you, and in return I received nothing but contempt. What makes you think I would be inclined to welcome you into my life now?
While you were sleeping, I changed too - I haven't remained "nice", every ready to "be there" for you, just waiting to drop everything to be by your side and take care of you. Your contempt and your sadism changed me. I am now what you would think of as "nasty". Not one of the bad boys who used to excite you, but one of the increasing number of men who has come to see you as their enemy.
An equal relationship with a woman like you is simply not possible. What you have to "offer" me is this:
1. The chance to have children entirely on your terms, when you see fit
2. The prospect of losing those children on your vindictive whim
3. A total loss of control over my own money
4. Arbitrary confrontations and accusations
5. A partner who believes I exist to serve her, and who refuses even to acknowledge the concept that I have feelings of my own beyond those she has decided for me
6. The loss of whichever of my hobbies and friends you dislike
7. A partner who can physically and mentally abuse and manipulate me, then dismiss any protest I make about it
You expect me to be instantly "ready" for you now, simply because you are ready for me? For me that shows that you expect our relationship to take place very much on your terms and not at all on mine.
Whilst you were changing so was I. I have become very happy without a woman in my life. And I have realised that you have nothing to offer me but pain. It is too late for you.
Sincerely
Mr Nice Guy
Isn't that brilliant? I think that he shouldn't have signed it as "Mr Nice Guy" though - he should have signed it as "No More Mr Nice Guy". That would be more real these days.
And here's my contribution (it's a bit late now to comment over there):
Isabel, you are a sex toy. You have spent your time from eleven onwards being used as a sex toy. It is what you are: nothing more. No man with half a clue would use you as anything more, and most certainly would not go all the way and marry you.
Thus, the retard that you eventually marry - if you are that lucky - will constantly piss you off. This is because he will treat you like a queen, where in reality you are not: and you know deep inside that you are not. This inner knowledge that you are not a queen, that you are actually a sex toy, will drive you to distraction - because you will not be treated like a sex toy by him.
And this is what you really want. You don't want to be treated well. Deep down you want to be treated like the depraved whore that you really are. You want to be used as the local town bike by every hot and sexy man in the world. The more the better. In groups. Taken, over and over, then dumped - because that's what you delight in.
I pity your poor cats (or purse-dog substitute).
Yes JB, you get it. These types of women are why we MGTOW pass.
