Basically Unattractive

Some thoughts on the boner killer...

You see some skinny, nerdy man wandering around with a landwhale.

Your thoughts might go along the lines of: "Dude, you can do so much better looks-wise!"

No.

It isn't that he can't do better. He probably could. If he could handle the stupid shit and generic retardedness.

I have had so many experiences where I've basically turned down sex with some fairly decent-looking girls.

I'm not talking 10's - I've never run across a 10 in my life, so far as I can tell. To me, for a girl to be a 10 requires a decent personality and a little smarts. As I think various people have stated over the years:

* hotter the looks

* higher the entitlement

* lower the intelligence

* crappier the personality

When I state "crappy personality" - any attractive woman can be nice as pie when things are going her way, when she's getting the attention that she thinks she's entitled to, etc. When the spokes come off the wheels and she flips her shit, that's when the rubber has really met the road and you have learned exactly what her personality is like.

It's called reality, cunt. It's a bitch, just like life being a bitch as you get haggard when you get older and your youth of alcohol, fucking, and smoking like a chimney really shines through. Beauty really is skin deep, and your skin has gone to hell and back. It got branded a few dozen times on the way too.

Back to nerdy guys. They may be like me.

Looks: Hooo boy! I'm'a up that like a rat up a drainpipe!

Opens her mouth: *wilt*

It's a different take on it. Whether it's accurate? Fucked if I know.

All that I know is that I've never really been able to get the hots for the overtly selfish, entitled, crazy types. Which is probably how I got blindsided by a well-concealed BPD/NPD type.

That chameleon aka NAWALT fooled me.

Empty Shells

A lot of the anger in the manosphere is due to the realisation of the lies that we have been taught.

(I sometimes wonder if it is also a part of what Keoni Galt calls the Feed Corporation - shitty food having screwed with our brains to the point of many becoming somewhat autistic. Of course, constant brainwashing from a young age through schools would have the same effect. Perhaps even complementing and reinforcing each other.)

For some of us - once we get through the rage phase, through the bargaining stage, past the depression and into the acceptance stage, there's a quieter period when we attempt to dig through to the truth of "why".

One of the things we should probably ask ourselves is: "Why are we so pissed off?"

Okay, there were lies and indoctrination shoved down our throats ad nauseum. We've gotten through that by now, we're trying to find the next stage. But there's sometimes still something stuck in our collective craws...

Anger. Still.

The thing is that this anger is misplaced.

Why?

Because the subjects of our ire are empty shells.

Bland, banal, worthless, empty shells. Of no worth or meaning to the world.

In aggregate, most cannot make or do anything which has the slightest meaning. An endless treadmill of nothing, nothing, nothing. Which is why they attempt to fill this nothing with shopping, "experiences", and general dipshit more nothingness.

Their only true value is in siring the next generation. Even at that, they suck brass monkey balls. Which is why they fuck it up so royally.

But boy, are they awesome when it comes to psyops - mentally fucking with the head, in such a manner that you overlook their general worthlessness.

Of course, a lot of men are likewise empty shells. These are similar parasites on society and the world as the shitty women are.

Grasping, greedy, pigs who are all too happy to get their hands into our pockets. The eternal cry of equality and similar bullshit - just another way for a parasite to lie, saying that they're fuckin' useless and can only live by sponging off you.

"Give me free shit!"

Without actually saying that so baldly to our faces.

'Cause if they did, what might happen?

Women just aren't important. 'Nuff said.

Fuck bitchez. Get money.

And enjoy yourself.

Your life will be so much better.

Check Your Privilege

No, not your male privilege. Shut your mouths, you feminazi hoes - unless you want a dick in it. Then get down on your knees, we'll oblige.

Your fuckin' urban privilege, you white university educated bitch.

Over on Cracked there is a two-page article about How Half Of America Lost Its Fucking Mind. It explains the whole Donald Trump phenomenon, referencing and explaining the tropes behind movies, and lays it out like shit on a shingle.

It's actually quite fuckin' awesome.

Which leads to a question, for all those feminazi cunts out there.

If Donald Trump is a rapist to be reviled and all that sorta shit...

...who the fuck bought 80 million copies of Fifty Shades of Shit?

(Yeah I know, thought I'd run outta stuff to say for the moment. Who'd'a fuckin' thought.)

Bleak and Nasty Realization

It's a pissing-down raining night here in the North Island of New Zealand. A Tuesday night in the middle of winter, to be precise.

I don't mind. I'm sitting here, warm and dry. Been reading...don't feel like sleep yet...am writing...I probably should grab myself a margarita, actually.

Actually...

Mmmm margarita.

I think of all the pathetic girls out there. Down the bars...doing "their thing" in life...Imma strawng, innipendant wimminz! Why can't I find a maaaaaan!

All the squares dress like whores. All the whores dress like squares. You can't tell the difference any more. If there is a fucking difference. Tattoo'd and pierced sluts out the wazoo...fucking nose-rings that look like snot...

Why the fuck are you dressed like a $2 whore and shivering out in the rain and cold and blowing icy winds in the middle of winter? Ya fuckin' dumbass fuckin' sheep.

Too stupid to get her own shit together. Too stupid to build up stuff - like buying a decent bed and some good winter sheets and an electric blanket so she can be toasty warm at night. Running around freezing her tits off, trying to get a man - to keep her warm and cared for, physically and financially and (temporarily) emotionally.

Too fuckin' stupid to realize that the pay-gap is a fuckin' myth, she makes more'n a good number of men do, and she pisses it all away trying to dress up so that she can scam a man outta drinks and the occasional fuck. With maybe the prize of getting preggers (child support!) and frivorce (cash and more prizes!).

I'm reminded of a Tinder whore I ran across a couple days back. She was 19, up on her Tinder profile she had: "I want to marry rich."

Oha. Really rich. I had to laugh. Like a rich man is gonna pick up some 19yo slut off Tinder and marry her LOLOL. Yeah right, she has a better chance of becoming a Dubai Porta Potty. Like he's gonna risk, in the slightest, any chance whatsoever of frivorce or a false rape accusation.

She ain't in his league. She ain't even gonna meet him. Not a fucking hope in hell.

Though I'll give her props for being an honest golddigger - even if a fucking stupid one. She don't have the common-sense and smarts make it this far, by far:

Just another stupid cunt, living in stupid-land, expecting her Prince fucking Charming to come along and woo her and slap a $10+k diamond ring on her fuckin' finger. Though some people are just so desperate, that they'd do it.

I'm bored. Bored outta my fucking tree, when it comes to wimminz.

Do they actually have any interests of their own? I can only remember two woman who did: scrapbooking (she only did it 'cause of the kidlets, making memories and stuff for 'em). Plus some serious fitness fanatic (which I can make a damn good argument is so she could pick up a man).

The rest are all: I'm bored. Entertain me.

No. I'm bored with you lot of morons. I'm gonna go entertain myself, do something that I find interesting and ultimately more personally fulfilling. Plus I'll have something worthwhile left at the end of it. A skill. A piece of artwork. A restored piece of furniture. (One of my fun things is to restore 100yo furniture - my home looks like a bloody antique shop.)

I honestly wonder how the PUA's can handle this female shit. Having to clown around to basically get some dipshits' attention...having to invite her out to do stuff that she might consider interesting...or more accurately: having to entertain the whore so that you can maybe dump a fuck into her.

To hell with it. As always, picking up these lumps of stupid becomes boring after a while. Even fucking them becomes boring. (Then you get the dead-fish and sand-bucket cunt types - yikes!)

Shit on it. I'm'a do my own thing. MGTOW...again, as always. Until I start feeling horny again, though at 50 years old you'd think my fuckin' testosterone would have slowed down by now. Somehow, it hasn't - one day I should look at the statistics for sex for older men, it's probably way higher than society is comfortable admitting.

My photography archive is completed. Right now it's getting transferred from my NAS to a USB3 external drive. I have 4:3:2 copies as backups: a step up from the old 3:2:1 plus I can't be arsed trying to transfer from PC to some dipshit place out in the cloud. Apart from having tracked a hacker back to a compromised server at a cloud-provider, NZ's internet infrastructure is a piece of shite and it'd take a week-plus to finish.

If it wasn't shite weather and short days, I'd be out the back yard pruning the grapevine and dealing to my overgrown garden. (Damn kaikuia.) I've actually got a place that a wimminz would love-love-love to sink her claws into...it's a throwback to the old 50's dreams of family life. She could enjoy its comforts, with her man-slave doing all the work both before and after the frivorce.

Yeah, fuck that. Away from teh wimminz again. MGTOW yet again...a cycle of boredom and horniness. Even though I've done the economics analysis, and a whore is cheaper, I tend to have problems with fucking whores. Just ain't as satisfying.

It's probably an emotional addiction of some sort. I'd best start working on that. At my age, it's not worth it to even partially fuck around with these whores. Especially when you're worth over the half-million mark. Pretty good given that I had about $20-30k left over from my frivorce, about 5 years ago.

In a way, the Tinder whore up there was a wakeup. I realized "holy shit, I'm actually a rich guy". Amusing, given that I'd been basically feeling "poor" for so long. That's what happens when she spends more'n she brings in. Go for 8 years of marriage feeling poor, to suddenly realizing that after 5 years of enjoying yourself after frivorce - you're fuckin' rich.

Actually fuckin' rich.

A wakeup.

The fuckin' paygap is a myth. She fuckin' wastes stuff like it's goin' outta fashion. Pissing it away, expecting - demanding! - some loser male to give her more. His time and his money. So she can piss both of those away too.

And I am actually fuckin' rich, after all that BPD/NPD and being cheated on and frivorce shit. Even after the biz went down the shitter and I became an em-ploy-ee. My brother's done better. He focused on making money.

Some golddigger would love to get her fuckin' claws into me or him, one way or another. Must protect myself better. Him too.

Margarita gone. After midnight. Time to go sleep in a warm and sheltered bed with the electric blanket.

Got to love some of the creature comforts in life. It's what men do: accumulate and build. Enhance our lives in many ways.

Good night, good life, my brothers.

Who's Raping Who?

From the men over at /r/MGTOW:

And who is culturally sanctioned?

Skinning the Morons Alive

Didact of Didact's Reach comes up with a beautiful example of how to absolutely flay any feminist, leftist, herdist, marxist, socialist moron that you should happen to run across - in 1 minute or less:

• In the entire history of the division of Berlin, precisely how many people went from West Germany into East Germany?
• Since the Castro revolution, how many boats were seen going from Miami to Havana?
• Since the Panmunjom Armistice Agreement that ended the Korean War, how many South Koreans have fled into the North?
• How many people do you know of that went from Vietnam into Cambodia during the height of the Khmer Rouge regime, instead of the other way around?
• During the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, how many people relocated permanently from Taiwan to mainland China, instead of the other way?

Beautiful.

No matter where you look, the answer is always the same: the workers living in those supposed socialist "paradises" were so in love with their new Utopias that they desperately fled them at the earliest possible opportunity. And that is because socialism simply does not work.

I think that he missed asking only one question:

• During the time of Communist/Socialist-controlled Russia, Cuba, North Korea, Cambodia, and China. Why weren't the Western academics that were touting the joys of communism and socialism and the like rushing over in droves to defect to these countries? According to them these places are/were paradise - why did they pass up their opportunity for a blissful life of joy in paradise on Earth?

Just to slam the final nail into the coffin of these lying pieces of shit.

He also dissects the mindset of the Millennial Generation. Sadly, I have to agree with him: many of them appear to be the most brainwashed consumerist generation ever, while at the same time loathing the capitalistic system that creates the devices and entertainments and programs that they lap up with unthinking semi-joy.

The doublethink is strong in the entire generation.

I am tempted to refer to them as "The Damned Generation" - because they must be the most self-helpless of them all. I'm not sure if I (or anyone) should gift them with any pity though. A good number of them would simply use it to attempt the victim game with redoubled frenzy. Leavened with extra hatred aimed at us, because they cannot face the self-loathing within.

It's always easier to blame someone else for your own situation and self-inflicted problems.

A bitter schadenfreude to wash down with my Grand Marnier tonight.

Social Transport

Feminists, leftists, Marxists, and other assorted SJW fucktards - this will make you cry. Good.

Along with the transport of goods (as per my Social Microclimate post) comes the transport of ideas. Also, inadvertently, the transport of disease.

Some ideas are little more than diseases of the mind.

So, the time of the Romans. The roads carried both goods and the ideas which created the classical world. It also carried the soldiers - the Roman Legions - to all parts of the Empire. Roman Law guaranteed safe passage along the roads, much like we take for granted the safety of driving around on roads through our modern-day countries.

The Mediterranean was actually the major means of transport of goods throughout the classical world. Via water it basically took 4 months to go from one end of the classical world to the other. Supposedly for the same price that it took to move a ton of grain about 75 miles via oxcart, you could ship it to the other end of the empire. This goes to show the real efficiency and ease of water-power. (That's why shipping is such a big thing even these days, and probably will be forevermore.)

Then Islam rose. They sank every ship they could, killed and raped and enslaved whatever they could, and basically cut all sea transport in former classical times down to nothing. The Black Plague was a known problem in the Mediterranean: formerly it would take 4 months to spread throughout the classical empire. With Islam destroying everything they could see, the spread of the Black Plague took 4 years.

This was the time that most of us think of as the Dark Ages. A time of bloodshed, destruction, impoverishment, violence, and widespread ignorance. Common "theory" states that the classical empire was destroyed by Germanic tribes invading - Dr Bill Warner contends otherwise. I find his explanation very compelling (yes, I've linked it here before).

Slave-trading, slave-trading, slave-trading.

Fast-forward.

Gutenberg invents the printing press. All of a sudden thoughts and ideas can be duplicated extremely easily and widely dispersed. Better, it allowed standardizing the written/printed language. Through England the canals enhanced the transport of goods, then roads got better, and eventually we developed engines: lighter and with more power than horses.

Along with the easier travel of goods follows ideas, expanding across the world. Like the old Roman Empire, the British Empire conquered and spread. "The sun never sets on the British Empire." That mindset, that cultural attitude, that social construct, was spread by force across the face of the world. Eventually the mindset waned, the sun did set on the British Empire, and the Commonwealth was abandoned.

These days we've gotten lazy - our Social Transport mechanism only carries propaganda and ideas around. This was originally via media, the radio and television, and now the internet. Through these social mediums we subvert the social mores of other cultures. We are rich and successful, we do this, therefore if you do this you will become rich and successful.

So people in Thailand take the second-most number of selfies in the world and post them up on Instagram every fucking day. And are bummed that they're not #1 any more.

Of course, our intellectual property is taking the fast-lane out of the West, heading over to the East where it is put into physical form and shipped back to us. Our secrets, our expertise, handed over to others because:

1/ it's cheaper to hire their slave-labor than do it ourselves

2/ we're too lazy to do it ourselves anyway

What we're not really noticing - because we are afraid? - is the mass-importation of the Islamic social construct into our culture. This is why we have things like:

a/ England importing Pakistani's into Rotherham and allowing them to run a child sex slave ring for nearly 20 years

b/ Netherlands, women refusing to lay charges against their Muslim rapists

c/ Australia, the Sydney gang rapes in 2000

d/ Australia, the Sydney hostage drama with Islamic extremists

e/ Germany, the well-publicised gang rapes recently

f/ Netherlands, women "not wanting to be protected" by their own men

The Frog agrees to carry the Scorpion across the river, because the Scorpion promises not to sting it. Halfway across the Scorpion stings the Frog. As they drown, the Frog asks: "Why?" The Scorpion simply replies: "Because it is my nature."

Why do women seek to destroy their men, when they promised otherwise? ("To love, honor, and obey.") It is their nature. And we enable it, in our warped and twisted social construct, which we are busy transporting to the rest of the world.

But sub-rosa, the Islamic social construct is being imported right back into our Social Microclimate. The Islamic social construct includes sexual slavery and intolerance of all other religions. Built right into its core doctrine. That is their Social Microclimate, a harsh and unforgiving one. A social construct which condones cutting a man's head off in front of his wife, then raping her in the bloody mess.

Women these days seem to be saying of these imported social trash: "He raped me, but I forgive him. He didn't know any better."

Tolerance.

Another word for fucking insanity. It's as if she is almost glad of the raping, at least someone felt that she was worth giving some sexual attention to.

Let me draw you a very graphic and hopefully disturbing-enough picture to properly get it into the average Joe's head (though Femicunts, lefticunts, Marxicunts, and SJWcunts are blind by definition - they will never understand that 1 + 1 = 2, they will always believe that 1 + 1 = unicorns that shit rainbows):

Here are 500,000 people. In their home country, because sexuality is so restricted and women are so scarce, they will gather together in groups. As a group they will gang-rape any woman that they happen to come across, of practically any age. Then the woman is "honor killed" by her family for bringing shame to the family. When they can't find a woman, the group will happily gang-rape any handy goats. They will also gang-rape young boys.

All of a sudden these 500,000 people want OUT of where they are. Being a wonderfully warm-hearted people, you graciously allow them into your country. You help them with free homes, give them basic food and clothing, and forgive them their idiosyncrasies - after all "they don't know any better".

Then one day you come back from work to find a large group of them on your front lawn, in full view of the entire neighborhood - who are watching with vague expressions. The group are busily and happily gang-raping your wife, your daughter(s), your young son(s), your sister, your wife's sister, your mother, your dog, your cat, and a couple of goats that they bought along for nostalgic reasons. (Imagine: "No man ever forgets raping his first goat." With a little tear of fond remembrance in the eye.)

And you stand there, limply wringing your hands, whimpering: "Oh the poor dears. The poor, poor dears. They don't know any better..."

Exporting and reinforcing and doubling down on the mental disease that is Feminism? Deliberately importing the mental disease that is Islam so that it can destroy your own social construct? I don't know which is fucking worse.

I do know that both are equally fucking insane. Because the morons doing this are willfully blind to the damage they do. In fact they seem to delight in it, like some addict shooting themselves up with ever-increasing doses of the latest drug du joir. One last high before you fucking die.

Please, just cut your own throats en-masse right now. Save the rest of us the hassle of dealing with the toxic social results of your fucking insanity.

Interchangeable and Society

Hold on tight, this'll make teh wimminz cry cry cry...

The PUAs make a big thing about pussy being an easily-found commodity.

Yep. They're all interchangeable.

Looked at coldly, it doesn't matter what the details of the woman are. When it comes to childbirth: a womb and pussy are a womb and pussy. It doesn't matter if she's some high-falutin' English heiress to 15 million pounds or some used-up crack-whore or some cute-ish Filipino or Thai chick who's burned her social bridges locally and wants a stupid Western man to wife her up. It's just another womb and pussy that pushes out a kid, ain't like that hasn't happened anytime in the past million-year history of the human species.

As Uncle Mitch once put it: The world has no end of warm wet holes and mouths.

Which is what makes me laugh when some single mommy states that her kids come first, when she's demonstrably going down on some new cock every week.

What's best for your kids: a) having a reliable man around, b) having unreliable or no men around

What's the best way to keep a man around: 1) putting him first, 2) putting your kids first

Stupid. Whore.

Conversely of course, cocks are an easily-found commodity. A cock is a cock is a cock. Which mindset teh single mommy wimminz have shown through their actions for quite some years, as they sample a variety of cock in their quest to "find themselves". (Which is wimminz-code for stuffing as much cock into all three orifices as possible - can you say "airtight"?)

Looked at coldly, it doesn't matter what the details of the man are. When it comes to conception: a cock is a cock is a cock, and evolutionarily may the best sperm win (see "Sperm Wars").

Now survival-wise for the woman and kiddies it's a slightly different matter. Using manosphere terms, Chad Thundercock has the best sperm while Bob the Builder has the reliability and nouse and therefore the money to keep body and soul together through his steady work. So we get to the concept of "Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks", and our current socially-acceptable state of single mommies out the wazoo until they find someone to wife them up and keep them going for their final years (which has its own problems when she recalls her glory-days with Chad Thundercock and becomes discontented...)

So part of "The Red Pill" is swallowing the fact that men are disposable (interchangeable) in teh wimminz eyes. Plus conversely, in your male mind, you need to grasp - get it solidly into your head - that women are also disposable (interchangeable).

Looks don't mean shit if you can't stand to be around her for long periods of time. This leads to the pump'n'dump mentality, because the ones who're available are so fucked up that you can't - literally can't - bring yourself to stay with her for long. Assuming you can stand to get with her in the first place. You pump'n'dump, it's that or go completely fuckin' insane.

Understand that this isn't your fault. Back 200 years ago, if she was lucky she had a pool of 10-20 guys to choose from and there was nothing remotely anonymous about the process. If she became the village bike she couldn't hide it. She couldn't hide stepping out, too.

Similar situation with women in rural areas these days, only when she goes to a bigger town or city does this change. Easy transport and large numbers of people has vastly enlarged the pool of guys to potentially tens of thousands, plus making her invisible in the crowd. She gets to experiment as she stars in her very own porno rendition of Girls Gone Wild and Gangbang Barbie.

The hypocrisy and doublethink then comes into play in women's thinking. He is disposable while I am a pweshus pwincess etc. All of society and her upbringing have told her so, reinforced every day through the media and movies and being catered to by every quisling maggot that puts her up on a pedestal to worship her rancid from umpteen guys cum golden cunt.

Which is why she goes fucking insane when you pump'n'dump her entitled shitty ass. You've just shown her, and all and sundry, that she is not an indispensable special snowflake princess.

That she's just as interchangeable as you are.

Why Social Media Sucks

No, not just because it acts as narcissistic supply for the typical modern whore.

No, not just because it's filled with banality.

It's because everything you say can and will be used to destroy your life.

It's because of people like this entitled bitch using it as a platform for her lies to destroy a Nobel Laureate's career (I'm cherry-picking from the article, read the whole thing for yourself):

On Monday, June 8, a British academic called Connie St Louis uploaded a sensational document to her Twitter feed. Beginning with the question ‘Why are the British so embarrassing abroad?’, it offered an account of bizarre remarks that a Nobel Prize-winning biologist by the name of Sir Tim Hunt had made earlier that day at a conference in Seoul, the capital of South Korea.

Within hours, Sir Tim was being hauled across the coals in newspapers and TV bulletins across the world. Unable to defend himself, since he was travelling back to the UK, the bespectacled professor’s only response was delivered via a voicemail message to Radio 4’s Today programme recorded in haste via mobile telephone in Seoul airport.

Then, early this week, the simmering dispute took a further, seismic twist.

It came courtesy of The Times newspaper, which revealed the contents of a leaked report into Sir Tim’s fall from grace compiled by an EU official who had accompanied him to the Seoul conference.

This individual, who has not been named, sat with him at the lunch and provided a transcript of what Sir Tim ‘really said’.

Crucially, it presented a very different take to the one which had been so energetically circulated by Connie St Louis.

Strangely, given that there were more than 90 other journalists present at the fateful lunch in Seoul, no other detailed accounts of the toast have emerged.

And then it turns out...

Perhaps, therefore, we should ask two other related questions: who exactly is Connie St Louis? And why, exactly, should we trust her word over that of a Nobel laureate?

A good place to start is the website of London’s City University, where St Louis has, for more than a decade, been employed to run a postgraduate course in science journalism.

Here, on a page outlining her CV, she is described as follows:

‘Connie St Louis . . . is an award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist.

‘She presents and produces a range of programmes for BBC Radio 4 and BBC World Service . . . She writes for numerous outlets, including The Independent, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The Sunday Times, BBC On Air magazine and BBC Online.’

All very prestigious. Comforting, no doubt, for potential students considering whether to devote a year of their lives (and money) to completing an MA course under her stewardship. Except, that is for one small detail: almost all of these supposed ‘facts’ appear to be untrue.

All neatly illustrating that the herd as a whole is as stupid as bricks and doesn't deserve a voice (in fact the majority of these morons need to be muzzled).

Also neatly illustrating why anyone who uses FaceCrap, Twatter, and InstaCunt on a regular basis should be trusted almost as far as you can spit a mouthful of fishhooks.

Finally, very much illustrating how even academia will turn on each other in the moment that any kind of leftist distortion of an unfavorable type gets mentioned about any one of their own members - even one of decades good standing and tremendous contributions to science.

Oh, here's a picture of the award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist entitled bitch who started this shit-storm of what appears to be lies:

The Herd, in it's hatefulness, destroys itself and progress and anything good.

=========================

Lets do an additional aside here. You've probably heard of Leonardo da Vinci.

You may have heard of the Antikythera Mechanism. It's an ancient analog computer which was designed to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calendrical and astrological purposes. Also for the Olympiads, the cycles of the ancient Olympic Games. (From Wikipedia.) Yeah, they had brass gears and the like before 100BCE. It wasn't until the 1300's that they got "reinvented" again.

You may not of heard of Hero, though.

In case you didn't hear of him, the Greek inventor Hero (Heron) first invented the steam engine (the Hero engine, or aeolipile) in 10CE. Now, there wasn't much bloody use for it in Alexandria so it never really took traction as it were. Until you realize:

The ancient world had a number of rudimentary railways. Of course trains didn't run on them. They were grooved paths which had vehicles pulled, probably by a mix of horses/humans/gravity. The most famous was the Diolkos, crossing the narrowest section of the Isthmus of Corinth and allowed ships to be quickly transported overland. It operated from roughly 600BCE and was still going in the time of Hero.

If the two - steam and railways - had been combined, goodness would have happened.

Hero also created basic robotics. He mostly used his automatons to put on plays. His biggest achievement: a completely automated play that lasted for more than ten minutes. Supposedly each segment of the play had two different settings and could do different things depending upon how it was arranged (binary, anyone?). Apparantly it wasn't bad either, according to: Techgnosis: Myth, Magic & Mysticism In The Age Of Information.

Hero was not just an engineer - he was supposedly brilliant at mathematics and a great theoretician. He came up with the basics of Fermat's principle. He came up with the basics of optics which supposedly weren't improved on for a thousand years (by the Arab scientist Alhazen). He discovered Hero's formula and imaginary numbers. He played with the Pyramidal Frustum (here's the Wolfram|Alpha link if you're so inclined - it's basically a pyramid with the top chopped off).

He may even have invented wind-powered machinery. Nobody's quite sure about that. There just doesn't seem to be much in the way of information about them before he showed up.

(A source for Heron is here.)

So, 2000 years ago a prototype steam engine was created. Then what happened? Civilization declined.

It was 1600 years before the steam engine was effectively reinvented and put to use.

If we would stop listening to the banality of the herd, who are concerned only with their preening fucktardisms and the latest stupidity from the Cuntdashians, we might have traveled to the stars by now. We might have colonized other worlds. We wouldn't be limited to a single planet that we are currently polluting in various ways. We wouldn't be in the social situation where we are now.

The herd sucks.

Social media - the voice of the herd - sucks.

Social Deconstruction: What Rape Culture?

It's time to roast these assholes, with their eternal paean regarding "rape culture", over a slow fire. Maybe we'll get lucky and can make them cry bitter tears of ultimate shame in the process (though they're generally shameless). Let's get started.

First, let's define the assholes involved and why I call them that:

* academics - pushing their theories out into the world (technically I am one of these)

* feminists - attempting to push their agenda and hopes of personal social relevance upon others

* feminist-indoctrinated - this is your average female who has gone to college (or watched too much TV)

* manginas and white knights - enablers and pussy-beggars ("oh you poor dears/do you want some dick?"), no you ain't getting laid

* the media - jumping on everything sensational in an effort to make $$$, rather than to fact-check and share real news

Now let's look at the feminists basic rape-claim from decades ago:

* 1 woman in 4 gets raped during her lifetime (ignoring the "eye-rape" claims of really fucked-up women)

Finally let's look at the mathematics:

* there are 322 million people in the USA (Wolfram|Alpha)
* that makes 161 million women
* that makes 40.25 million women get raped (in America)

If we define a lifetime as being between the ages of 15 and 45 (as the "rape-worthy" agespan category for all but really weird guys):

* assume that perhaps 1/3rd of women are currently in the "rape-worthy" agespan = 13.42 million women

* the agespan is 35 years * 364 days in a year = 12740 days

* that's 13.42 million women / 12740 days = 1053 women get raped every day in the USA

Time to check the newspapers. Births...deaths...marriages...where's the "rapes" section? Even if only 1% of these rapes were actually reported, that'd make a half-page to a page. After all, we *know* that bad news sells. The media even has a saying: "If it bleeds, it leads."

So what do we actually see leading? We see one rape splashed all over the front page of the newspapers. For a week or a month. Then it's back to the bloody Kardashian's or whichever stupid cunt "celebrity" who "accidentally" let her personal nudie pics out onto the interwebs for all to see.

Fucking. Bullshit. Exposed.

So, what's all this crap about a rape-culture? Hysteria. Attention-seeking. Pushing an agenda to change the social mores to make themselves feel important and relevant in the world.

The socially-irrelevant and actually-powerless, agitating to make themselves seem (and feeeeeel) more important than their actual pathetically lowly and worthless status in society. "Look at me! I've done this to help raise awareness about <bullshit feelgood garbage>!"

Stick a fork in 'em. Oh yeah. They're done.
--edit--
As Mindstorm points out, I messed up my calculation - the real numbers are more like:

* assume that perhaps 1/3rd of women are currently in the "rape-worthy" agespan = 13.42 million women

* the agespan is 45 - 15 = 30 years * 364 days in a year = 10950 days

* that's 13.42 million women / 10950 days = 1225 women get raped every day in the USA

Mindstorm also pointed out that the actual demographics give higher numbers of woman so I dug up some more information from Wolfram|Alpha and found that there are 62.5 million women between the ages of 15-45 in the USA:

* 62.5 million / 4 = 15.625 million rapes
* agespan 30 years * 364 days in a year = 10950 days
* so 15.625 million women / 10950 days = 1427 women get raped every day in the USA

I'm still looking for the "rapes" section in the newspaper - did somebody pinch it?

What You Can Destroy

Uncle Bob has an interesting article up about how a century of feminism has failed women, written by Belinda Brown of The Conservative Woman. I'm going to cherrypick a few bits from the article, though I think the entire post he's put up is worth reading and thinking upon - this is simply my take on it:

Firstly, feminists may be a minority, but they are powerful. Women have real power in the family, rooted in their reproductive capability. This may, entirely through women’s individual decisions, lead to a secondary role in the public realm. Feminists have used this lower public status as a bargaining chip to pursue their own self-interest in every possible avenue of public life. Today feminists control the traffic lights and the road rules, men are only chauffeurs, even when they appear to be in the driver’s seat.
...
Secondly feminists are not amenable to rational argument. There are none so blind as those whose view has been eclipsed by ideology; ideology built on distortion, piled on top of stupidity and upon lie after lie until the truth lies buried deep beneath. Feminists are not going to turn traitor to an ideology which has not only nurtured their careers but determined crucial, life changing, and possibly life destroying, decisions in their private lives. The courage required to recognize their error would not be outweighed by the gain.
...
Feminism works well for women who want visible power and influence. But it has no strategy for social reproduction. Boys on Ritalin, internet addiction, obesity, oversexualised children, men in prison, fractured families – feminism has no long term survival strategy. These are just some examples of its scorched earth spawn.
...
You are right, Neil, that ultimately it is women, women who destroyed so much through their pursuit of self-interest, but who, because of their reproductive potential hold the key. This time round it is going to be very much harder. Men trusted us, they served us, they built our houses, fought our battles and they received our respect embodied in patriarchal structures in return. But now they have nothing. What is more they have found out that if they do give us what power they had, we deprive them of their children, we take their resources and we give them nothing, nothing in return. This time round we can’t expect them to do our bidding, as they did for so long. If we want to win back their trust and if we want them to co-operate with us, and I do, we will have to concede some of our independence and be prepared to place some dependence on them. In this, for their own security, we will have, I am afraid, to allow them to take the lead.
...
This is what the feminist century has done. By almost destroying the family it has shown us that it is the cornerstone of society. If we want self-fulfilled, happy, creative individuals, a functional, well networked society and a civilization worthy of emulation, we need strong healthy, resourceful families built on the commitment and selflessness of adults, persistence and a lot of hard work.

As I have quoted before: "If you can destroy something, you control it." - Muad'Dib, Dune

However that doesn't mean that you should destroy it. Especially for your own selfish gain. Which the author admits that feminism has done. (Note: While a lot of Men would like to destroy the feminist-centric grip on society, I am beginning to doubt that there will ever be a strong or lasting effect. There are too many white-knight manginas and assholes willing to throw all men under the bus for an opportunity to empty their nuts into a woman.)

It's interesting that the author also refers to feminism and MGTOW as Scylla and Charybdis. Two poles, steering between them safely. Unfortunately she makes one very large mistake in her thinking (given that this is a female writing the article, I cannot say that I'm surprised):

Only the steadfast women who are happy to prioritise the interests of their husbands and their children can set this process in motion. The feminists can’t, nor can the MGTOW. Women can do it, but only with the help of men. Together we can undo the damage which feminism created and rebuild a world of which can feel a little more proud.

"...only with the help of men..." - indeed.

Picture a couple together, standing shoulder-to-shoulder against the world, marching boldly and proudly into the future. A pretty and noble image.

Rah fucking rah.

The author's female entitlement mindset is such that she seems to automatically and unthinkingly expect Men as a whole to step up to the plate and help the process along. The final sentence reeks of a sub-rosa "man up" message. Fail!

A woman can shout to the world that she is happy to prioritize the interests of her husband and children. Yet we Men no longer have reason to cooperate and do our part in the process - let alone believe anything that women say.

Belief? Trust? In a woman?

Our harsh experiences have proven otherwise.

Feminism hasn't "almost" destroyed the family. Feminism has destroyed the trust between the sexes - at least, for the current generations.

With no trust, with no enforceable worthwhile marriage, there is no family.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

The Freedom Trap

The idea of going expat is an interesting one on the surface. If you're a man who wants a wife and family you can repudiate your home (Western) country and find yourself a bride overseas. The benefits seem to be manyfold:

* she'll be slimmer than Western women
* she won't be as slutty as Western women
* she'll have a way better attitude than Western women
* she'll be more traditional than Western women

So let's scratch through the surface of this, dig into the darkness and muck that lies underneath:

* slimmer, yes - they know that looks matter to men
* not as slutty, maybe - how are you going to be absolutely certain of this though?
* better attitude, yes - a trap is better baited with honey
* more traditional, yes - while she's in her own country

They know that looks matter to men. Foreign women don't delude themselves - much. There is certainly some delusion there though. I remember seeing a documentary about Western men looking at Ukrainian brides. One of the potential brides was in her thirties and had a daughter, from memory she was divorced. She was delusional in that she thought a Western man would "save" her and her child. Even so, there were still pathetic men in the documentary who seemed interested in this trash (hopefully only for a fuck).

Perhaps not as slutty. Perhaps. In the above-mentioned documentary, one of the meeting places where these people got to know each other was a bar. Music, lights, noise. Very conducive to conversation (indeed!) and the girls were up dancing on the floor (sluts on parade!). You cannot know if a woman was or was not slutty - you have not been on the scene long enough to see the disconnect between what she says and does. Though dancing up there, sluts on parade, is a helluva weight on the sluttiness side of the spectrum.

A trap is better baited with honey. No fooling. The femicunts have convinced the Western herd that they can openly be complete shit and it's all right - that it's a good thing to be. Thus, sluttiness celebrated along with the other you-go-girrrl'ism that we have shoved in our faces constantly. You lure better with honey than with vinegar, sweetness and light rather than hatred and contempt.

Traditional while she's in her own country. Yes indeed. There have been many cases of men bringing brides to the West and - once they get their citizenship - bingo, frivorce, she then goes to do what she wants. With cash and prizes. Note that men aren't the only ones who've had this happen to them, it's also happened to women who've fallen for a toy-boy who is all lovey-dovey until he gets his green-card. There are Russian brides who get in and then import their Russian boyfriend.

So it's better to stay overseas? In her country? Not really. Feminism and it's entitled cuntism mindset is spreading to other countries, like the warped and twisted virus mindset that it is.

Thailand. The Philippines. So-called traditional countries. My mate's mother-in-law in Thailand was divorced. I ran across a divorced woman in the Philippines who was out looking for a Western man who would treat her decently, because the local men treated her like what she was: a piece of shit.

I remember one of the writers over on Return of Kings, stating that getting to know the locals was a better way to go. Go to the bars where the locals frequent, not the shitty tourist-trap bars. Get to know the men. Once things loosen up, you will see them pull awesome tail.

No shit Sherlock. You've stepped out of the tourist traps and stepped into the places where the local good-time-girls and good-time-boys have their fun. These girls aren't sweethearts, they're the local more-pleasant version of Western sluts.

High-quality women indeed.

Looking at that, going expat does not sound like a real solution to your desire for a wife and family. It's just another lure - one of freedom - freedom to trap you in another country, isolated, where you don't understand the society, where you don't understand the norms. Freedom that can ultimately still trap you in the situation of providing for a woman parasite.

Yes, you can somehow muddle your way through it. However, the bed of roses has it's thorns in it, doesn't it? Unless you are somehow exceptionally lucky and manage to get yourself together with a true NAWALT. Good luck meeting that, in a country where you're even more isolated than the Western country that you grew up in.

Shit - iron pyrites aka fools gold - is everywhere. Real gold is rarer.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Mixed Thoughts In The Herdmind

This is some additional thoughts to the post on Bromance, No Homo, and Slash. I should have made that much clearer, especially my reason for adding the LGBT are Dodo's part to the end of it.

I simply couldn't get it to fit quite properly.

So here it is, a bit more that hopefully makes things clearer in context.
=======================
It is very telling the mixed thoughts going on in the herdmind:

1/ Full glorification and support for LGBT etc.

2/ Utter intolerance of normal male friendship and generally branding it as homosexual

So they at the same time both glorify and denigrate homosexuality. A prime example of Female Doublethink and Self-Deceit. and Female Best Intentions and Lies Women Tell Themselves.

Someone out there knows how the herdmind thinks (or rather, doesn't reflect!) and appears to be using and abusing it with great enthusiasm. You almost have to admire the sheer amount of insane doublethink that is being shown by society (which is basically driven by women). Plus the chutzpah and hubris exhibited by whoever it is feeding this mindset of warped doublethink.

We sure as shit have realized that women do not engage much in the way of retrospection. They seem utterly unconscious of the craziness and delusions and lies which goes on inside their heads. Really, if they were conscious of it, then they'd probably kill themselves.

Because it'd be impossible to consciously believe that you're a fuckin' Princess who belongs on a fuckin' Pedestal, with a Golden Uterus that makes you the Perfect Immaculate Person and the Ultimate Goddess From Whom No Wrong Can Come - while at the same time completely realize and understand what kind of piece of shit you truly are deep inside.

The true depth of mutual illusions and self-delusions in the female herd/creature is breathtaking.

Bromance, No Homo, and Slash

Commentor Anonymous over on Uncle Bob's came out with this comment (regarding the German Pilot who crashed a plane with all hands aboard):

Well, the guy was a pilot after all. I thought that women regarded pilots as being sexy, adventurous and attractive? I thought pilot was one of the "sexy occupations" for men, like doctor, cowboy, fireman, 50-Shades-of-Grey billionaire, etc., that women dreamed of. So to go off thinking that this man had problems attracting women and was an "omega" guy without any other information is bizarre (the guy looks ok in that picture with the golden gate bridge (no homo)). Was the guy recently divorced or broken up with a girlfriend?

My emphasis the "no homo".

What immediately struck me was that a completely anonymous commentor still felt the need to add "no homo" when (presumably he) stated that the pilot looked okay in his picture.

Thinking back on things, I've heard guys say that they have a "bromance" with another guy. As in "me and him have a bromance thing going on". Were these guys homosexual? No. They used the word to describe a deep male friendship. (A word that I've only heard in the last half-decade - though that might simply be NZ being isolated from the rest of the world.)

Then I had a think about "Slash" fiction. This is basically fan-fiction (usually by women) where the male friendship of a pair of well-known characters in regular fiction is characterized as strongly homoerotic. Sometimes the fan-fiction has it changed (twisted?) to a flat-out homosexual relationship. (Notable example: Kirk and Spock from the Star Trek series.)

Interesting.

So this appears to be more evidence of the poison going on in society: the pathologization of male-male friendships. Society seems to be surreptitiously getting across the idea that all male-male friendships are essentially homosexual in nature. The triple concepts of bromance, no homo, and slash are all some evidence towards it. There are probably more that I don't know of or recognize.

It would seem that no heterosexual guy wants the slightest hint of homosexuality in his male-male friendships. In his gut he likely feels that this (homosexuality) is wrong on a deep level - if he felt otherwise then he'd possibly have homosexual leanings himself.

Note that I'm saying "it would seem" and "likely feels" because I have no data: only my own gut feelings. YMMV. Try to use your own perspective on this, rather than reflexively using the herd-socially-approved-groupthink of equalism, equality, tolerance, etc that has been drummed into you via the modern leftist/socialist school system that we've been forced to endure.

At any rate, this seems to be another method of controlling males: if you demonize male-male friendships, these bonds never form, the male is left isolated and alone with no male support group. All the better prey for the female to control in all ways. Especially when you see the loss of a mans friends once he becomes married - until his "friends" become the socially-approved emasculated husbands of the wifes friends.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.
=================
Note: Back in the post on LGBT are Dodo's, I stated that they are biological dead-ends and attention-whores. If they're quietly telling you their sexual preferences (and you're not family) then they're probably interested in hooking up with you and think you might be interested. When they go out into full-on "shout it to the world" then they're just attention-whoring for the social-pass that these minorities have.

Shit Testing is a Label

A week or so ago I looked at a common mental map in the Manosphere when I said that hypergamy is a label that we use to describe a bunch of traits. Those traits basically boil down to bad behavior due to no discipline etc in the growing-up of a feral little bitch. I also stated that we need to be cautious about putting it into a box and saying it's evolved behavior, because we risk giving women another pussy-pass (evolved or not, training is possible - just look at potty-training).

Similarly, so-called shit testing is not some kind of "fitness testing". It's just bad fuckin' behavior that is running rampant in society. I didn't even bother to point that out explicitly because I figured it's a given.

Then I ran across this video by Sandman:

It's an interesting talk that includes some stuff from Angry Harry:

Why And How Do Women Manipulate Men?

50 years ago, if a man slapped his wife, BOTH MEN AND WOMEN were usually of the view that she deserved it in some way. And the reason that they usually thought this was because they knew how easy it was for women to manipulate men and they also knew how hard it was to provoke normal men into assaulting women. 

In fact, most societies - and religions - seem to have been aware of this for thousands of years. (Remember the ducking stool!)

Of course, now she can get away with foul behavior without any repercussions. The best that the PUAs can manage these days is to cut her down (neg her) verbally - because he's not socially allowed to punch her teeth in when she drops a nuclear-grade bunch of foulness on him. (Another pussy-pass that society gives these feral whores.)

In fact I've heard (feminized) women bitch about the whole idea of negging: "Why do they have to cut down her ego like that?" These stupid cunts just don't get it. Fifty years ago, a woman came out with that she'd lose some teeth. It was in no way considered acceptable behavior. Of course, being femicunts they stupidly are "concerned" about a man "cutting down" a womans already over-inflated ego. Fuck'm'all.

Sandman also talks about make-up sex: "So if a woman insults a man, she might be wanting to initiate rough sex deep down in her subconscious mind. She wants to unleash his aggressive energy and channel it towards a sexual end." There's a lot more about this too, very thought-provoking stuff:

Nature is a crazy bitch that tries to piss us off - and then shoves a naked vagina passively in our face and says: "Here. Is this what you want?" 

Women piss men off because they're horny and want to reproduce with us. This is their subconscious behavior coming out.

So here's an interesting thought. Next time some woman drops the "Nuclear Bitch" on you, smile and indicate to her to come closer. If (when) she does: whack her ass so hard that she squeals and everyone around stops and stares at you both. State very clearly (so everyone can hear it): "That kind of nasty behavior is not acceptable anywhere, most especially in decent company." Indicate all the others.

Everybody knows how hard it is to provoke a normal man into spanking a woman in public. It just ain't done, especially these days. Massive social shaming for her - and if Sandman is correct, she might be 100% submissively turned on as well. Now order her around like a dog that's behaved badly: "Sit there." Even move her there physically. (Yes, I've ordered women around - they do it.)

Maybe one of the PUAs will give it a whirl. I'd be interested to know how it turns out.

At any rate. Bad behavior: check. Lack of discipline: check. Fitness testing: fail. More likely she's trying to see if you're a strong man (won't take her crap) or a weakling who'll lap up her runny shit (pathetic orbiter material that she can soak for favors). She's trying to see which bucket you fit in:

1/ Fuck me now!

2/ Would fuck.

3/ Girlfriend (friendzone).

You are now free to smack your bitch up.

Worthless Grandparents

In my post on the Fuck'n'Chuck Generation, I stated about our Grandparents:

• being useless pieces of selfish shit who raised both the father and mother above (the general uselessness and sins of the grandparents being passed down to their grandchildren - with more generations to go)

It's actually a systemic problem which has occurred over several generations, each succeeding generation seemingly getting worse. It appears to have really hit hard at the time of the Baby Boomers (aka the Me Generation, the self-indulgent nongs who embraced flower-power and free love and hippiedom). Here are the Generations roughly defined (source):

• The Greatest Generation - these are the generations that experienced World War II. They are further split into: the G.I. Generation (born 1901-1924) and the Silent Generation (born 1925-1945). The G.I. Generation either fought in WWII or kept the home fires burning, the Silent Generation were the children who grew up during the war.

• The Baby Boomers - this is the generation that was born after WWII (born 1946-1964). They experienced space exploration and the first "counterculture".

• Generation X - these are the generations that experienced the Vietnam War and Cold War. They are further split into: the Baby Busters (born 1965-1980) and the MTV/Boomerang Generation (born 1975-1985).

• Generation Y - this generation experienced the rise of the information age, the internet, the War on Drugs, Iraq, and rising gas and food prices (born 1978-1995).

• Generation Z - this generation experienced the rise of the information age, the internet, various bubbles, and digital globalization (born 1995-2007).

The Grandparents who were worthless basically were the Baby Boomers. In some instances (mine) my Grandparents, members of the Greatest Generation, were not that flash either: my Grandparents ended up divorced too. My mother, a member of the Baby Boomers, was one selfish piece of shit who lucked out on her third try:

1. a single mommy (child given up for adoption)
2. married and divorced a criminal (after two children)
3. finally married a small-time businessman (with his brood of 4 children from a piece-of-shit woman)

On top of that she's still a selfish, whining piece of shit who hates how her life has gone. Instead of being grateful for that third try, which got her out of the shit single-/divorced-mommy trap she was in, she whines about hubby a lot. People who cannot see how fucking good they have it are fucking pathetic.

I was going to expand more upon how worthless these various Grandparents of the generations really were. Then I ran across this recent post from Amerika.org which states it far better than I can:

Kill the Boomers

In his post he explains exactly how selfish the Baby Boomers really are, the techniques of leftism that they used to hijack society, and how they slammed the social door upon their own children and every generation to come.

Some highlights:

It is significant that they emerged from the victorious powers of the Second World War. Generally when a child grows up with no consequences for his action and yet a sense of great entitlement, we call him a brat. The term “brats” is not often enough applied to the prolonged tantrum [My emphasis. - BPS] that was the 1960s, in which the children of the war revenged themselves on their parents by taking the philosophies those parents claimed to uphold and throwing them back at them.
...
The entire Baby Boomer mentality is one of finding exceptions and, using those to claim the invalidity of the philosophy that opposes whatever the Boomers desire, creating a justification that allows them to seize power. If you do not support freedom for everyone (it helps to slowly enunciate each syllable in this word to emphasize its importance) then you are bad, and the new generation should take over.

Now this is where my Generation takes a beating around the head'n'shoulders:

Generation X grew up thinking that the best thing they could do was to recapitulate the hippie era by acting out the ritual: drugs, sex, rebellion and then - just as the hippies did - cutting the hair, getting jobs and retreating to the suburbs from the broken-down society the hippie ideals had created.

This also strikes deeply - many have stated that Feminism is an extended infantile tantrum (see above also):

In addition to wanting complete personal liberation, which was a fit of pique [My emphasis. - BPS] at their parents, the Me generation formulated one other agenda. They wanted to close the door to all who followed. Like most radical individualists, they engaged in a combination of narcissism and solipsism which actively denied the world outside themselves except as it could be used for the benefit of themselves. Society existed to be the canvas upon which they painted their bright and beautiful existence. 

Selfish much? Familiar much? It gets way better:

As parents, the Me generation provided a paint-by-numbers example of how to utterly fail. Most divorced, and left their kids wondering if their own conception had not been a mistake; those who did not manipulated their children relentlessly, setting them up to fail and then using that failure as a justification to re-program their lives toward Baby Boomer objectives, which as always are to use ideology as a shield for the personal quest for power. They were narcissistic parents who hid their child abuse behind so many labyrinthine passages of logic that Generation X grew up baffled, belittled and most of all accustomed to instability. If Generation X has a symbol, it is the child’s bedroom with a door that locks; after the terror of the Boomers, they wanted nothing more than to retreat and have a space of their own to be inconsequential, mainly because their damaged brains and psyches needed time to figure themselves out.

So there we were, Generation X, repeating in a shell-shocked unthinking manner the narcissistic patterns of our fucked-up parents. With these two examples, no wonder Gen-Y and Gen-Z are so fucked up. We all followed the patterns we were shown, like good little robots, and passed them on:

Baby Boomers created hell in their wake. Narcissistic individuals tend to shut the door this way because to them, everyone but the self, and those who provide that canvas to make the self seem to be an angel of enlightenment, is an ideological enemy. To the Boomers, their children were the enemy. What if those children found enlightenment the Boomers did not? What if they did not agree with the 1968 agenda? Those were the worst children of all, and the best way to punish them was to create a trap, much as Baby Boomers were accustomed to setting up their children to fail and then seizing power when the children failed, much as the Boomers seized power when the Establishment had no answer to its new calls for peace, equality and freedom. All of these were justifications; the real goal was revenge, in destroying the world of their parents and those who followed after them. In short, to obliterate, erase, eradicate, pollute, corrupt, sabotage and vitiate everything but the Self. Baby Boomers saw themselves alone and for this reason they ran to ideas which “seemed” to be the opposite, such as egalitarianism, and used them as weapons.

In fact it looks like there were five generations (so far) involved in the bloody mess, counting my Grandparents (most other people's great- and sometimes great-great-grandparents). Read the entire thing and have a think about it. Read the comments too, they're very interesting.

Myself, I think it's time for the gym. At least I can work on improving myself, even if I don't think that there's any way to fix this fucked-over broken system that we've all had the misfortune to be brought into.

Hypergamy is a Label

In my last post I tried to put across the idea that what we think of the world isn't necessarily the actual world. It's just a mental map of how we think the world works - and of course the real world is quite happy to smack us upside the head and leave us panicking because we can't figure out why the fuck it decided to do that.

The reason that we're panicking is because we've taken the mental map and said "this is reality - end of story". Now our mental map is broken and we don't have a working map or the mental flexibility to roll with things. We've been too fixated on the damn mental map for too long.

So lets have a look at a common mental map we have in the manosphere: hypergamy.

Characteristics of hypergamy might include: sex with random men, cheating, leaving a man for a perceived higher-status man, deliberately getting pregnant by a man, narcissism/selfishness, divorce/frivorce, lying, BPD/NPD behavior, etc ad infinitum.

Now, we could say that this is an evolved behavior for an enhanced chance of better genes being spread. It might even be somewhat true. Yet I could also argue that such evolved behavior should have been nearly wiped-out evolutionary-wise by the force of 10-15,000 years that we know humanity spent living semi-civilized in villages and towns and cities and the like.

For example, in the days of 5,000 years ago: if you caught someone screwing your wife you probably killed the pair of them. It's unlikely it was a one-off thing, she was probably cheating on you regularly. May as well finish it for good. Hell, maybe even the kids too: chances are they ain't yours. You probably didn't sit around pulling your limp dick while five guys with big penises jackhammered your wife in rapid succession (cuckold porn).

In the more modern old days these behaviors were frowned upon: they often resulted in the ending of the female family line. Social pressure was a tremendously powerful force. If a girl made a mistake and was extremely lucky, her family might rally-round to keep it secret, raise any bastard children, etc. She had to toe the fuckin' line. Otherwise she'd likely be thrown out of the family, disowned, and end up prostituting herself to live day-to-day. Chances were high that she died.

Let's look at it from a different angle. Let's say that these characteristics attributed to hypergamy are simply learned bad behavior - or a lack of learned good behavior. Let's say that these characteristics are becoming more commonly-noted because society has gotten a lot easier on women simply because they're women (aka we give them the pussy pass).

Take a dog. It develops bad habits. Do you leave it with those bad habits? Shit no! You train it. Positive and negative reinforcement, depending upon what's appropriate. Eventually you end up with a well-trained and well-behaved dog.

In the old days they had ways of controlling (training) their women. Punishments. Social ostracism which was a force that actually meant something. They were married young before they started messing around, then it became the new husband's job to train and deal with her appropriately. Even boot her out if she was far too obstroperous, the children (if any) going to him because he had the income and could afford to raise them.

Any woman who was 16+ years old was considered a spinster - undesirable, probably too set in her ways, and highly likely incapable of being trained to appropriate behavior. After all, if she had developed appropriate behavior, she wouldn't still be single. She'd have been snapped up by a man pleased to have her.

In the old days in Japan, bukkake was a degrading punishment for a woman. These days in the world it's pornography, a sex act that some women glorify in. The more the merrier.

Where's our modern training for curbing bad habits? What do you mean, training? It ain't there no more. Even mention it and you will be subjected to an open deluge of foulness, scorn, spite, physical blows, and hatred that no man would have ever received from a "decent" woman 100+ years ago.

Look at an untrained dog that has developed bad habits. We ain't stopping it, so it's just gonna continue. It's probably gonna get worse (from our point of view) because we ain't laying down and enforcing any boundaries, training it to do more acceptable things. Just let it do whatever the fuck it wants with a "who cares" attitude.

Why are girls getting stinking drunk, having a piss or shit on the sidewalk, passing out in a pool of their own puke, fucking any man they like, and getting knocked up? Because nobody's laid down the boundaries, penalized bad behavior, and reinforced good behavior. (Bad and good from a social as well as a personal view.) In fact there's a vocal group going: "You go girrrrrl!" at the top of their lungs.

Which is why blogs like this one exist: pointing out the incidents and saying "this is what's going on, don't ignore this shit-awful behavior or give it a pass". While we're not allowed to beat the girls black and blue when they give us the finger and go do more bad stuff, we can at least warn each other that this is going on and say "don't get involved in that crap - they just ain't worth the pain".

Hypergamy? Yeah, you could put it in a neat little box and label it and say that it's an evolved behavior.

Chances are a fuckload higher that it's simply selfish, self-centered, narcissistic, acting-out bad behavior by a bunch of childish little cunts who've never had the belt around the arse from daddy to teach them better. There's certainly nothing else out there to restrain these little cum-buckets from wrecking things.

(Like the whole government providing incentives to baby-mommas by paying for their womb-turds. Stupid, stupid fuckers who made that a "thing". They're simply - deliberately? - destroying the restraints which keep women in families to raise a decent next generation. Ditto for divorce, frivorce, etc.

To knock it into people's fucking heads: When you give people money for doing something, they're going to do it. Especially when it's now lauded by the fucktards going: "You go girrrrrl!" at the top of their lungs. Yes, glorify those brave, battling single mommies - who no fucking way would be doing this if they weren't getting a handout to help them cope.)

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Female Doublethink and Self-Deceit

This is somewhat of a follow-on from my post about Female Best Intentions. Commentor Anonymous asked for any further thoughts regarding willful ignorance and concealing intentions - which when I think about it, those things are for protecting her self. (In fact there are some interesting comments on that post, I'll attempt to answer a few in here.)

I ran across this concept some time back: doublethink.

The context was having stated no desire at all to do X - in fact, stating flat-out "no way are we going to be doing X!" - yet preparing "just in case X actually happens". You simply have to take a look at it and *know* that X is gonna happen, somebody is deliberately planning on it happening, they simply want to retain plausible deniability. You betcha ass.

Doublethink.

Those laws regarding divorce: division of property, child custody, child access, child support, alimony, etc. Ask her to sign a pre-nuptual - and she freaks. She would *never* do any such thing. Only really bad women - not her! - would deliberately do that, those laws are for women who genuinely made a mistake and really, Really, REALLY need to get out of a bad situation. It's to protect them and the children.

Five years down the line, she gets bored of the relationship and frivorces you. You get assraped in the court, she gets the children and the house to live in plus child support, while you're still paying the mortgage on the house and paying alimony. If you're lucky you're living in a friend's basement rather than a van down by the fucking river - and she's teaching the children that you're the most filthy scum on the planet while fucking her way along a string of bad-boys who make her wet.

Doublethink.

You've been going together regularly for some time now and she suggests that you move in together "because two can live cheaper together than one". You decide "okay" 'cause you like her and have grown comfortable with her - and co-sign the lease with her, etc. Things go swimmingly for a while...then start to go downhill. She doesn't have her share of the rent. Or the food. Or the power, phone, water.

You finally've had enough and hit her up about it - bang, you're outta there with a restraining-order on your ass, while she has all your stuff that you can't get to any more. She moves in some bad-boy and fucks around for a while, while you're sleeping on a mate's couch. You're still paying your half of the lease that you are legally on the hook for - plus hers because she simply claims to the landlord "that piece of shit stole it" or "he hasn't paid his share" or something similar.

Doublethink.

She supports the entire idea of "battling single mommies" and the government supporting their kids - after all, think of the children! They need that if things go bad! Then she deliberately gets preggers by you, no-way is she gonna marry you (even though you were definitely good enough to fuck her multiple times), and she's creaming her jeans as she gets both child-support from you and a handout from big-daddy government.

Did I mention bad-boys prior?

Doublethink.

Do you seriously think that she set out to deliberately screw you over? Nah. She seemed all happy, chirpy, bubbly - because she WAS all happy, chirpy, and bubbly. All radiant in her joy. A pleasure to be around. So you kept her around.

Then things got stale, so she went looking elsewhere for her next dose of fun. Just like an addict, looking for an emotional high. Not reflecting upon and examining things: she's never been taught to. Not reflecting, not looking at her actions, not looking at her morals, not engaging her conscience (or common-sense) in the slightest.

Fifteen years down the line, age 30+, she suddenly decides: "I'm ready to settle down now."

An addict of fifteen years, ready to settle down and never go looking for another emotional high in her life. Yeah, right, good fucking luck to any poor bastard who gets locked into that mess. Give it 5 years, frivorce, and looking again for a helluva lot more emotional highs from all the bad-boys she can give it away to for free.

Then once the bad-boys dry up: "Where did all the guys go? What happened to all the good guys? Why can't I find a maaaaaan?" And it's aaaallll men's fault.

Perhaps it is. Perhaps we should'a put her on a social choke-chain, to restrain her from doing bullshit things which will fuck up her life long-term. However, all that old social shaming stuff is totally meaningless these days. Passe. Gone. Women are strong, free, and empowered sluts in our Brave New (Social) World.

Now, to pull all that bullshit there has to be a certain amount of self-deceit going on in a woman's head. All women's heads. This is the level of cognitive dissonance - of willful ignorance - that damn near gives me a migraine to try and comprehend. It basically becomes part and parcel of protecting her self. By extension, all womens selves.

A good liar can still slip and get caught out. If you are not lying then you don't slip (because you can't) and you don't get caught out (because hey, you're not lying). The worst that could be said about someone who unknowingly passes on a lie is that they were misinformed. (The media pulls this variation of plausible deniability all the time.)

Following that chain of thought: the best way to pass a lie on is to tell it to someone else who doesn't know that it's a lie and they pass it on honestly. It's called rumormongering. (Media are used in this manner by various special-interest groups, to shape the memes that go around. Memes like Global Warming, Brave Battling Single Mothers, Pollution, etc.)

Now apply this concept to the self. A woman lies to herself, saying that she is X, and acts that way most of the time. The few slips can be glossed over and excused, especially with the harpy's-chorus chiming in to help defend her. A woman lies to herself, convinces herself, and then passes on her lies unknowingly. That's the willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance that a woman deals with internally.

This is spoken of by Rev. Shannon in The Predatory Female: he calls women chameleons. They take on the colors of a mans interests to attract him - ensnare him - marry him - and then the skin comes off and she reveals her real self, once he's hopelessly ensnared. You can meet a woman, she's X way, then five years later you meet her again and she's Y way - all because of the different man she's involved with and how her chameleon nature is concealing and protecting her self.

I sometimes wonder if women can ever know what their true self is. Or is it all a lie - every little thing that you see of her, just a skin to cover that not-even-she-knows-what inside.

Which makes her the consummate predator, one that is capable of concealing her predatory ways even from her self.

One capable of deluding her prey into doing what she wants, even though it is destructive to the environment, making him think that it's his own idea. After all, men have basically hunted down and eradicated every single creature on this planet in the past million years. Sabertooth are extinct - and they lived all the way from Canada down into South America. Huge lions once stalked through Europe and England. Mastodons.

In the past the individual man wasn't gonna click to all this. He simply didn't have enough examples to say "hmmm - this is a trend that can't be explained away by whatever bullshit smokescreen women can come out with". Which is where the internet is helping us men to wake up: we are getting so many examples, through a media that can't be censored or have a particular special-interest-group put their spin put on it.

The lies - even the self-deluded lies - are beginning to unravel under an avalanche of reality from across the world.

Female Best Intentions

It has struck me over the past few months that many women don't always come across as conniving, selfish, greedy, grasping, two-faced bitches. Until something goes wrong with a relationship - then it seems to come out with a vengeance.

So the thought has slowly come to me: many don't really go into a situation with malice aforethought, etc. That's all the sub-rosa brew bubbling underneath. It seems that they might actually come into a situation with the best intentions possible. Only once it blows up does the malice come out.

The level of cognitive dissonance - of willful ignorance - for a woman to pull this off almost gives me a migraine to try and comprehend.

I am struck by the preface to "The 48 Laws of Power" by Robert Greene:

Finally, those who claim to be nonplayers may affect an air of naivete, to protect them from the accusation that they are after power. Beware again, however, for the appearance of naivete can be an effective means of deceit (see Law 21, Seem Dumber Than Your Mark). And even genuine naivete is not free of the snares of power. Children may be naive in many ways, but they often act from an elemental need to gain control over those around them. Children suffer greatly from feeling powerless in the adult world, and they use any means available to get their way. Genuinely innocent people may still be playing for power, and are often horribly effective at the game, since they are not hindered by reflection. [Emphasis mine.] Once again, those who make a show or display of innocence are the least innocent of all.

Children - women - the "most adult teenager in the house" - not hindered by reflection.

A surface (you could even say inner) naivete, unhindered by reflection - and therefore unhindered by morals as well. If you're not reflecting on your actions, then your morals don't come into play, nor does your conscience bother you in the slightest.

So she can go into a situation with honest best intentions and come out with her desired cash and prizes and ongoing slave-man. Never mind the morals - they don't come into it. Never mind the reflection - that never happens. Never mind the conscience - without reflection upon morals, they are never engaged.

And it ends up all projected upon the man as "being his fault". She's not the one in the wrong. Because she doesn't reflect upon these things.

I wonder if there are natural "players" who are the same? Naive - go into a relationship with the best intentions - when the relation blows up - ends it ruthlessly ("it's her own fault"). Look for the next woman. No reflection, no morals, no conscience bothering them. No subtle warnings for the woman to pick up on.

As Robert Greene states: horribly effective at the game.