Above the Law

How do you know who is in charge? Who are you not allowed to criticize? That is who is in charge. That is who is above the law.

A recent poster child: Emma Sulkowicz. With that last name, is this an ethnic WASP? No - in fact, it appears to be Polish in origin. So because she's a girl, and an ethnic minority from another country - despite the existence of texts stating "fuck me in the ass" to the alleged rapist - she was allowed to carry around a mattress at all times. She passed this shaming attempt off as "performance art" - of course, the feminists loved it.

She even got to carry it up on the stage when she graduated. This is basically not allowed - yet she and her supportive female friends still did it. There is someone who is above the law.

Next to look at the case of a 14yo girl who was apparently raped at school in Rockville, Maryland. Seems that the alleged rapists were a 17yo from El Salvador and an 18yo from Guatemala. At least one of this pair is an illegal immigrant. Sexual acts forced upon the 14yo by this pair supposedly included:

* vaginal rape
* anal rape
* forced oral sex (oral rape?)

There has been quite a blackout in the mainstream media about this, though I did manage to find the link above to Fox News. Looks like nobody else mainstream would touch it. From what I can tell, there may or may not have been semen and blood recovered from the crime scene.

From what I can tell, both the 17yo and 18yo have been let off scott-free (no surprise for the 17yo, he's a minor). There are two more people who are above the law.

Bound and determined, the media is, to keep things silent. After all, can't have the narrative of "poor, poor victimized people, lets give them a helping hand" tarnished by the facts of them ganging up to rape little girls.

Or maybe that's why pizzagate has gone silent in the news recently. They want their chance at the little girls and boys too. So if you keep it all silent, they can have their shot.

At any rate, if you or your parents weren't born in America - instant get-outta-jail-free card. Pretty much no matter what you do, you can get away with it, you're above the law.

Brought to you by Crap-Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Consent and Terrorism

I have been thinking for a while, about the concept of consent. On a very sub-rosa level mostly, given various dribblings from Feminazism in the past re rape and consent and suchlike. It boils down to the old and very sensible maxim:

You can't rape a willing woman.

The fact that she changes her mind after the fact of consensual sex does not change what happened. It was consensual sex. Never mind the insanities of the left and feminazis and the white knight brigade and etc.

A few weeks ago a girl I know had a little bleat about Fifty Shades of Limp-Wristed-BDSM. She proclaimed to all-and-sundry that she'd not read it (yeah right) and said that what bothered her (aka got her all hot-and-horny bothered) was the non-consenting nature of it. (She hasn't read it, yet the non-consensual nature bothered her. Mental disconnect.)

Puh-leeze, retard. Anyone and everyone in the BDSM scene is by definition 100% aware and fully-consenting to be treated like shit, used as a toilet, beaten-and-tortured, repeatedly forced to orgasm, forcibly penetrated at random (most especially when they say "no! please! no! stop! no!" and cry uncontrollably), with whatever objects that their "user" want's to penetrate them with, et-fucking-cetera.

Retard.

This is on an individual level.

Step back and take a look at a cultural level.

Aaron Clarey has an excellent piece on why he doesn't care about the latest London terror attack:

Before you accuse me of being cold, heartless, evil, or a psychopath, understand the point of this post is one akin to the Serenity Prayer. A very important philosophical epiphany many people never realize, but should as it is vital to their psychological well being and mental health. It is one of accepting reality and not getting worked up in the world of theory. And the London attacks, like previous and any future terrorist attacks, are/will continue to make my point until the point in time something is actually done about Islamic terror. And I strongly suggest you set aside emotions, politics, and even your own sense of self-survival to clearly see and hear the point I'm trying to make.

First, "What is it this time?"
Be it the Nice attack in France.
The bombing in Germany's market square.
The Boston marathon bombing.
The Cologne sexual assault party.
The Orlando gay night club shooting.
Or
The hotel bombing in Mumbai.

It's very apparent that nothing new is going to happen. The media will immediately rush to say it wasn't confirmed that it was a Muslim who did this. Then, when it's discovered it was, they will rush out to say Muslims fear a backlash in their communities before the bodies get cold. There will be furor on the internet on the right demanding we "do something about this." And people on the left will rush to say it's racism to point out the attacks came from Muslims.

But in the end NOTHING different will happen.

NOTHING.

In this he is 100% correct. Nothing different will happen.

Why is this?

Because the Western world is - at least on some level - 100% aware and fully-consenting in it's own suicide.

Sweden. Norway. Germany. The USA. If they were not suicidal, they would stop it.

A bullet to the back of the head. No problems. Finis.

So I left this comment:

Who says that you have no soul, Aaron? I think that you have plenty.

You are simply being realistic. These "victims" are fully consenting "adults" in their own self-destruction. On a deep level I think that they are fully-aware of it also.
You don't get paid to keep them from committing suicide. You don't get points for keeping them from committing suicide. They have the full right - muh freedumb! - to commit suicide.

On that deep level, inside themselves, they are so miserable on an existential level that they are 100% okay with committing suicide. On that deep existential level, they are quite happy to help their fellows commit suicide also. This is why they scream and rant and froth at the mouth whenever someone attempts to stop them.

What they don't have is the right to commit murder, of you and your family and friends. So protect yourself and avoid the suicidal. Let them die on their own.

Remember. They do have the right to commit suicide, individually and as an aggregate. They do not have the right to commit murder.

In the face of such overwhelming idiocy, let them have at it. Just keep your distance and treat it as a filter, allowing only those who are not suicidal into your lives.

Remember that 99% of the world is retarded. You don't have to allow them under your skin, or into your lives. (Stoicism? Hmmm.)

Good luck and live well.

Keep Sockin' It To 'Em

Something that's so true: The USA Is The World's Bitch

I absolutely have to love the image of teh wimminz slutz hanging out for that strange cock (note that these are German slutz):

Yes girlz, welcome your new fuckboyz on your back with legs parted! Buncha traitors to your parents and grandparents, who built the civilization that you love to hate and spit upon.

Buncha worthless parasites.

Keep on hitting them, Aaron. A wonderful job.

Manipulation

Yeah, trigger warning. Terrence Popp really slaps us men upside the head in this one:

All that I can say is: yep. Seen it, been the victim of it, and still get blindsided by it occasionally. Happens all the time, women pushing the limits of what you'll accept.

Listening to it made me cringe. Such a fuckin' dumbass in the past.

You'll note the background image of the grouchy bitch with the smiling mask - here's a variation of it:

Shows the real demon inside, with those cold and empty black eyes. I particularly like the anarcho-feminazi womyn-power venus-and-fist symbol.

Death of a Manspace

I've been away from my gym for a couple of weeks, it's been difficult staying in semi-shape for that time. Even doing a lot of walking, and some bodyweight exercises, I gained a couple kilos. So I go back...what do I see...

NEW

Female Friendly Workout Zone

SCULPT

(I won't put up the picture - too identifying - you get the drift.)

Oh my.

So looking around, an area of about 1/4 of the gym - that used to be filled with various machines designed to push iron to the sky - has been partitioned off with some cutesy screens with a cutout of some stylized silhouette of a sculptured chick. It's all marked up now with "Women's Only Zone" and shit like that. Said screens basically allowing people to peek through.

I walked to the entrance of the area and looked around inside. Spacious - you could almost say expansive. A few machines around the outer area, the middle totally open. Plenty of friendly space for teh wimminz to work out in.

I look at the remaining 3/4 of the gym. Most of the original machines have been crammed into it, making things cramped and inconvenient for teh eeeevil menz.

"Female Friendly" - reverse those two. Female becomes male, Friendly becomes unfriendly. Male Unfriendly.

I can smell the trainwreck coming a mile away. Cater to the pussy. One day, some man will be noticed casually glancing at the area, and teh wimminz will be going "oh, we don't feel safe any more".

These cunts belong in Contours, a women-only gym. Not in this gym. Not around guys who have stainless-steel bowling balls for nuts.

I'm already looking for a new gym. I might be shit outta luck. That's the problem with living in the ass-end of nowhere in Bum Fuck New Zealand.

Importing The Dregs aka Why Racism Is Good

Eyes, balls, brains - all present and accounted-for. This is gonna offend a shitload of people, most especially all those infected with the leftist-feminist-marxist crapola thinking. Including those who believe in Democracy, in being fair, in committees...all that shit that teh herd uv wimminz live-and-breathe. Hold tight and lets see how far down this rabbit-hole of thinking goes.

I've already written about the exporting and importing of social mores in my Social Transport post. Also the transport of civilization and ideas in my Social Microclimate post.

So, with the importation of crappy refugees and their shitty mores and morals and ideas - coupled with a self-wanking self-abasement mentality of "I am more tolerant than you / no I am more tolerant than you / no I am more tolerant than you" by those who lurve, lurve, lurve being cuckolded - we have things like the Rotherham sex-slave ring that goes on for 20 years with a blind eye turned by the local Bobbies.

Now I'm going to turn around and say that you can't entirely blame the local Bobbies for letting this go on in their patch. The reason: the local lefties and wanktards and jackoffs would not have believed them. It does not fit their mental narrative, their mental map of reality, therefore it does not exist. Try to tell these whack-jobs any different and you'll find yourself fired and blacklisted for good.

Realistically I wonder how many of the local Bobbies did get fired, or "voluntarily retired", after not being believed. A self-perpetuating misery that they were stuck in, with no other way out. My gut feeling is that there were a few good men who got out because they couldn't stand the shit. Something that the media wouldn't report on, because that "doesn't fit the narrative".

Leaving only the crap who can delude themselves that it's okay, or who will actually take advantage of the shit-sandwich. The good Bobbies are gone, forced out, leaving only the shit-awful remains of Bobbies to not-protect their local slice of society. So much for that Social Microclimate, gone way down the clappers with a huge sucking and flushing sound.

So we have imported the dregs of another society, to fuck up our own lives. You can imagine the relief of their leaders: "At last, we have a dumping-ground for our trash and criminals. We'll call them refugees and those morons will beg us to take them in. It's genius!"

What's next, we in the West start bidding on these "refugees"? Buying slaves that are not slaves? Just to satisfy some sick'n'twisted publicly-seen do-gooder crap in our otherwise empty lives?

Now, those who emigrate on their own to get away from a shithole? On the whole they are gonna be good people. They've gotten it together enough to voluntarily move lock-stock-barrel away, have a money-and-life-building mentality, have chosen a better country and society to move to, and generally know what the fuck they're getting into. They're expecting different culture and are prepared to adapt to it.

Refugees? Nah. They expect us to bend over and take it up the ass whenever they want to give it to us. These are not good imports into our society and country - worse, it's all encouraged by the self-wanking self-abasing leftist pricks referred to above.

So I might like individuals - and loathe the people from the country as a whole. You can go there and see why: the dregs are roaming around. Travel broadens the mind: yet once you've done it for a while, you start to realize that you're exposing yourself to some really whacked-out assholes who have wildly divergent belief-and-action-systems than you have. This is why you end up getting mugged while walking down the street in some second- or third-world country.

Because you're not used to thinking that every idiot on the block is looking to pick your pocket - or knock you over the head for a few bucks. You forget for a moment. Similarly, this is why foreign brides probably do so well with Western men: we're not used to thinking that despite her good looks and nice behavior, she's still a parasite looking for a man to leech off. (Especially those who can and do get divorced once they become citizens. Dipshits with multiple Russian brides who never learn from it. Sheeeeit.)

Which all brings us around to the roots of racism. Let's look at Wikipedia on racism:

Racism consists of ideologies and practices that justify or cause or perpetuate unequal treatment of groups or individuals based on criteria of perceived racial or ethnical difference. These can take the form of social actions, practices, beliefs, or political systems (e.g., apartheid) that consider different races to be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other, based on presumed shared inheritable traits, abilities, or qualities. It may also hold that members of different races should be treated differently. Some variants include a belief in hierarchies of worth arising from biological differences between peoples.

Which is why the leftist-fucktards absolutely loathe racism: it goes against their narrative of nicey-nice "why can't we all just get along" equalism lunacy. Racism is prejudice against others for whatever reason.

So teach that equalism lunacy to kids in school. I had two friends - the three of us were the brainiest ones in the entire school. If you think the other kids (and even the teachers) didn't pick on us 'cause we were different, you've got rocks in your head. The lunatic creed of "get along" didn't exist back then. Prejudice did, and absolutely still exists where the teachers can't see it.

Further down in the Wikipedia page it talks about xenophobia. Interesting how the leftist-crowdist dribble labels it as "irrational" and "unreasonable" dislike and fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners or anything that is strange or foreign. Again, shit on anything that goes against the narrative of nicey-nice equalism lunacy.

Using a google search, the definition of xenophobia comes out as:

dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries

Prejudice, once more. This is the key part. Prejudice. What causes prejudice?

Experience?

Going back to school. Why were the other kids and the teachers prejudiced against myself and my two friends?

Because we didn't think and act like them?

Why are we prejudiced against foreigners? Because they don't think and act like us?

Why is xenophobia labeled as being irrational and unreasonable? The leftist-fucktards have labeled it so because it makes them uncomfortable, going as it does against their creed of equalism. It screws with their delusional mental map, which must must must triumph over the territory that is actual reality. Yet, xenophobia is based in experience. Experience of others who do not think and act as we do.

I might like individuals. I loathe the race as a whole.

My loathing is because of my experience with the race as a whole - or the experiences of others that I trust somewhat. If several people say the same of the race as a whole, out of their personal experiences, I am more likely to believe that anecdotal shared experience. My liking of individuals comes about because of personal experiences with those individuals only.

I believe shared experience because these experiences come from my people who think and act the way that I do.

Irrational and unreasonable, my ass. It's totally 100% rational and reasonable. No matter these leftist-fucktard pricks trying to blow smoke up our collective assholes, we know better in our gut.

This is the roots of "racism" and "xenophobia" - shared and personal experience. Fuck the redefinitions, absurdisms, and bullshit inflated crapola shoved down our throats by the leftist-fucktards and their self-wanking mentality. Shared and personal experience of reality. It protects us from the thoughts and actions of people who do not think and act in the manner that we do.

This is why Racism Is Good.

It's also the roots of our freedom to associate only with those that we feel comfortable with. Try to force me to live next door to some person whose food stinks so bad that I feel like vomiting, who doesn't clean their house at all, and who just tosses his garbage in a pile outside the door? (Something that my brother has personally experienced. Fucking revolting he reckoned, with cockroaches everywhere.)

No thanks, fuck you, I'm outta here.

It's called White Flight, and is sometimes deliberately triggered by people with an agenda for an area. Amusingly, some of those people are leftist-wanktards - ideology and hypocrisy has no boundaries when it comes to $$$.

In my youth, there was a saying: JAFA = Just Another Fucking Aucklander. These days it has changed: JAFA = Just Another Fucking Asian.

As Terrence Popp states: C.U.N.T. = Can't Understand Normal Thinking, and H.O.E. = Horizontally Oriented Entertainer. (We can apply the former to all leftist-marxist-retards. Come to think of it, the latter as well...)

We in the manosphere/MGTOW arena exhibit our own prejudices aka racism - towards women. This is a prejudice/racism/xenophobia which has been brought about by shared experience. Which is why we say YAWALT - one of my first posts ever on this blog.

Too bad for you C.U.N.T.'s and H.O.E.'s. I might like some of you women as individuals, in a severely limited and ring-fenced manner ("am I fucking you? I must like you then"). I loathe and distrust the "race" of women as a whole.

Racism and Xenophobia are Good. Why? Perhaps an example will illustrate.

When I was over in Thailand for a wedding, my mate told me some things that were very interesting about Thailand:

1/ Foreigners and foreign-owned companies were not allowed to own land-and-buildings. They can lease, nothing more. I understand that it's the same in China.

2/ Foreigners have to go through a rigmarole every 3-months or so to stay in the country (perhaps including leaving and returning the next day).

3/ You can get permanent residency, which allows you to become a director of a public company. You can then become a naturalized Thai citizen, at which point you can own land-and-buildings. It's a long and involved process.

So what political system is Thailand? Constitutional Monarchy (until 2014, now it's a Military Junta - happened soon after I left).

Which tells you something about a Constitutional Monarchy. They look ahead - way ahead - and they make abso-fuckin'-lutely certain that they're not gonna do something that'll fuck up their children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren etc 1,000 years down the line.

Remember what I put on Social Microclimate about bridges and cities and overarching themes regarding urban planning, building for 200+ years ahead? These people are DOING IT. Or at the least, making absolutely certain that they're not handing it all over to some foreigner for a few pennies.

Unlike our stinking short-sighted politicians (in New Zealand, and I gather America and the United Kingdom as well). Because in their leftist-fucktard-short-sighted mind it's okay to sell out your future for a couple of bucks today. Who gives a shit, they already have their snout in the fuckin' trough. Never mind the childreeeeeeen...

So why are our fuckin' politicians like this?

It's simple when we think about it. Politicians are only concerned with getting elected this term/next term. They have their snouts in the public trough as long as they can possibly manage it - ditto for the (un)civil servants and bureaucrats who maintain them: "100 years down the line? Don't make us laugh mate! 10 year plan at best!"

Crass and overt short-term greed, lies, backtracking - all manifest, certainly not hidden. So how do they get elected?

Teh wimminz vote, and the quisling male suckups trying to get some pussy by following teh wimminz vote and proclaiming that they followed teh wimminz vote.

Democracy in action. A bunch of spoiled fuckin' children voting free benefits for themselves. Never mind reality. The greedy and self-serving politicians follow along, paying lip-service for their own personal gain.

Hang the future. Hang reality. Hang the childreeeeeen...

So, a definition of Democracy:

Democracy, or democratic government, is "a system of government in which all the people of a state or polity ... are involved in making decisions about its affairs, typically by voting to elect representatives to a parliament or similar assembly," as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary.

All the people. So who has the loudest and most numerous voices? Oh yeah, teh wimminz - just listen to Big Red aka Chanty Binx aka Feminazi Cunt saying "SHUT THE FUCK UP..." a few dozen times.

We've already established that most women Can't Understand Normal Thinking. IE they can't understand reality at all - and have screaming shit-fits when you try to explain it to them ("you're mansplaining to me! that's abusive!"). The delusional map in their head overrides it, though sadly not to the point where they think that gravity doesn't exist and they step off a cliff expecting to fly...though there is a small amount of delusion, which is why many of them are gravitationally challenged.

So a better definition of Democracy might be:

The loudest voice and the most votes dominating the government and therefore making decisions about the country as a whole.

Which is kind of frightening when you look at this picture and start playing "connect-the-dots":

Look at the 115 IQ point, the upper boundary of "normal" intelligence (one standard deviation away from the mean of 100 IQ). Check the bottom row: 84% of people are "normal" or lower.

So the average person Can't Understand Normal Thinking...and votes in free bennies for themselves...and the politicians and bureaucrats go along for the ride 'cause they want their noses in the trough...

So I guess that we can understand why a lot of people prefer to not play "connect-the-dots" and would much rather remain in an unthinking state or checking out of society entirely, going ghost. Because it's FUCKING AGGRAVATING when a BUNCH OF FUCKING MORONS goes around playing HOLIER THAN FUCKING THOU MIND-FUCK GAMES WITH US.

Especially when those mind-fuck games involve denying that what I can see with my own eyes is real. And that I should bend over and take it up the ass like a good little fellow-moron. And that it's good for me. And that I should both enjoy it and feel privileged that I'm taking it up the ass from them like a good little slave should.

So I'm given a job to do at work. It's going to fail. Why? Because I have no authority to say "get 'er done" to the retards that I'm supposed to be dealing with. Fucking committees and their endless circle-jerk wanking off. No problem though: I can simply push it upstairs, telling them that in my view it's ready to go when they give the word. Even better, I am completely bypassing the pathetic female herdthink paranoia of covering their ass and obsessive nit-picking and polishing a turd until it gleams like gold. No two years of this shit. It's ready, fuck your "committees" and "decision-making".

So I propose doing various regional functions to a group of people. They start going all gooey-eyed over it, wanting to do "committees" and "raising participation" and having "meeting groups" and shit like that. We've got a month to get this crap done. No fucking way. Regions that're interested, put up your hands. Fine. You need to do X and Y. I will do Z plus put together some artwork to run past you. The artwork gets cut back for various reasons, but hey, the goddamn functions are on-track and ready-to-rock.

Meanwhile these Can't Understand Normal Thinking people are out there having a little snit-fit, noses outta joint, 'cause I told 'em to go fuck'emselves. Cry me a river, morons. The job's getting fuckin' done without your "participation" and similar bullshit bogging it all down in Idiocracy.

Dictatorship or Monarchy, one person in authority making the decisions, beats Democracy hands-down. Mostly because Democracy is constantly laying on it's back, taking it like a good little Horizontally Oriented Entertainer.

Or a slave taking it up the ass.

And this-all is why racism is good...xenophobia is good...and democracy sucks monkey-ass.
---additional---
It just occured to me, there is another "social construct" which devolves to the lowest common denominator and runs on emotion. A mob.

Runnin' riot through our civilization...

The Roman's gave out their dole of grain and free entertainment in the form of circuses. All to desperately pacify the mob.

Screw Your Fucking Opinion

Her: You've got issues.

Newsflash, bitch: everyone in this world has issues.

It's because we're living in hell.

Eventually, in the end, no matter what you do, someone in the world is going to come along and snarkily say to you: "You've got issues." Or something similar.

As if they know in detail what's going on in your heart, life, mind, and soul. The arrogance of people who do that is breathtaking to an extreme.

So I have to ask myself about these types of people with their unasked-for opinions:

* Are they specially trained?

* Have they had the opportunity to quiz me intensely?

* Have they taken the time to tabulate the results?

* Have they cross-referenced and cross-checked for accuracy?

* Have they taken the time to reason through what is indicated?

* Have they asked for corroborative or denying data?

Once they've been trained and have done all that (assuming MY FUCKING PERMISSION to do all of those invasively personal things in the first place). Then they might be capable of making a reasonable inference and stating a case for X situation going on with me.

Generally though, it's just a kneejerk snarky reaction/sound-bite designed to put me into what they feel is my place. Effectively they are verbally pushing me down. Artificially pulling themselves above me.

With the arrogance to think that they have the full, 100%, all the rights in the mother-fucking world, pass to do this. To stomp on someone - anyone. To crush them under their feet. As if they were God. As if everyone else were simple plebian scum. As if their (often female, usually moronic/leftist/SJW) selves are the final arbiter of everyone else's life, regardless of reality.

Screw your fucking opinion.

The Beaten Man

Like Dr Bill Warner regarding Islam:

The western world is likened to the abused wife, the beaten dog, and the raped child (42-43 minutes if you want to skip ahead). In a state of fetal self-protection.

Now look at the effects of Radical Feminism. Leaving men in a state of fetal self-protection, like a beaten child or dog.

More than feral. Almost becoming insane.

Have you ever seen a beaten dog suddenly turn on it's tormentor? It's not a pretty sight.

Can you imagine some beaten men suddenly turning on their tormentors? That would not be a pretty sight. Women prate about being oppressed. They don't know what they're talking about.

Assuming, of course, that the Western empire isn't destroyed by the immigrants which they are inviting into their backyard by the boatload. As is already happening in the Scandinavian countries and the EU.
==========================
I've add SFC Ton's blog to my blogroll. I hope that he continues to produce content. I like what he's done so far.

Feeling Shame

Over on the RoK hit-piece, a commentor replies to me:

Bear Hands 

"Feel shame for what is shameful to you. Don't feel shame for what others tell you to feel shameful for." 

The first one comes from red pill men trying to make you better. The second comes from feminism.

My response:

Interestingly put, I kind of like that. To paraphrase: "Feel shame for what is shameful to you. Red Pill men trying to make you better." 

A question about this though. Ignoring the whole shaming attempt thing of calling these guys virgins who can't get laid - which some are definitely not.

It seems to me to be a lack of respect towards these men, of whatever stripe. These people (MGTOW) are nominally adults and in many cases chose their lifestyle. Whatever the events that caused them to go in various ways. Whether it's a cost-benefit analysis, getting screwed over by a really bad ex-wife, seeing what happened to a friend or family member, etc. 

It seems as though some Red Pill men are projecting their sense of "what is shameful to you" on to these others, who have decided their path through life. This seems to be a lack of empathy and consideration towards their fellow-men. A lack of respect for their choices in life. 

Very female- and feminist-like in it's way.

Ignoring the issue of the sub-rosa doublethink agenda behind these hit-pieces ("Pay me $$$ you losers and I will teach you how to fuck hawt chicks!").

Definitely a lack of respect towards others. Though what more can you expect - of a segment of men which advocates becoming somewhat sociopathic/psychopathic in order to have sex with naive women?

Uncle Bob has some great ideas regarding Shame and Guilt.

Why Social Media Sucks

No, not just because it acts as narcissistic supply for the typical modern whore.

No, not just because it's filled with banality.

It's because everything you say can and will be used to destroy your life.

It's because of people like this entitled bitch using it as a platform for her lies to destroy a Nobel Laureate's career (I'm cherry-picking from the article, read the whole thing for yourself):

On Monday, June 8, a British academic called Connie St Louis uploaded a sensational document to her Twitter feed. Beginning with the question ‘Why are the British so embarrassing abroad?’, it offered an account of bizarre remarks that a Nobel Prize-winning biologist by the name of Sir Tim Hunt had made earlier that day at a conference in Seoul, the capital of South Korea.

Within hours, Sir Tim was being hauled across the coals in newspapers and TV bulletins across the world. Unable to defend himself, since he was travelling back to the UK, the bespectacled professor’s only response was delivered via a voicemail message to Radio 4’s Today programme recorded in haste via mobile telephone in Seoul airport.

Then, early this week, the simmering dispute took a further, seismic twist.

It came courtesy of The Times newspaper, which revealed the contents of a leaked report into Sir Tim’s fall from grace compiled by an EU official who had accompanied him to the Seoul conference.

This individual, who has not been named, sat with him at the lunch and provided a transcript of what Sir Tim ‘really said’.

Crucially, it presented a very different take to the one which had been so energetically circulated by Connie St Louis.

Strangely, given that there were more than 90 other journalists present at the fateful lunch in Seoul, no other detailed accounts of the toast have emerged.

And then it turns out...

Perhaps, therefore, we should ask two other related questions: who exactly is Connie St Louis? And why, exactly, should we trust her word over that of a Nobel laureate?

A good place to start is the website of London’s City University, where St Louis has, for more than a decade, been employed to run a postgraduate course in science journalism.

Here, on a page outlining her CV, she is described as follows:

‘Connie St Louis . . . is an award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist.

‘She presents and produces a range of programmes for BBC Radio 4 and BBC World Service . . . She writes for numerous outlets, including The Independent, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The Sunday Times, BBC On Air magazine and BBC Online.’

All very prestigious. Comforting, no doubt, for potential students considering whether to devote a year of their lives (and money) to completing an MA course under her stewardship. Except, that is for one small detail: almost all of these supposed ‘facts’ appear to be untrue.

All neatly illustrating that the herd as a whole is as stupid as bricks and doesn't deserve a voice (in fact the majority of these morons need to be muzzled).

Also neatly illustrating why anyone who uses FaceCrap, Twatter, and InstaCunt on a regular basis should be trusted almost as far as you can spit a mouthful of fishhooks.

Finally, very much illustrating how even academia will turn on each other in the moment that any kind of leftist distortion of an unfavorable type gets mentioned about any one of their own members - even one of decades good standing and tremendous contributions to science.

Oh, here's a picture of the award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist entitled bitch who started this shit-storm of what appears to be lies:

The Herd, in it's hatefulness, destroys itself and progress and anything good.

=========================

Lets do an additional aside here. You've probably heard of Leonardo da Vinci.

You may have heard of the Antikythera Mechanism. It's an ancient analog computer which was designed to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calendrical and astrological purposes. Also for the Olympiads, the cycles of the ancient Olympic Games. (From Wikipedia.) Yeah, they had brass gears and the like before 100BCE. It wasn't until the 1300's that they got "reinvented" again.

You may not of heard of Hero, though.

In case you didn't hear of him, the Greek inventor Hero (Heron) first invented the steam engine (the Hero engine, or aeolipile) in 10CE. Now, there wasn't much bloody use for it in Alexandria so it never really took traction as it were. Until you realize:

The ancient world had a number of rudimentary railways. Of course trains didn't run on them. They were grooved paths which had vehicles pulled, probably by a mix of horses/humans/gravity. The most famous was the Diolkos, crossing the narrowest section of the Isthmus of Corinth and allowed ships to be quickly transported overland. It operated from roughly 600BCE and was still going in the time of Hero.

If the two - steam and railways - had been combined, goodness would have happened.

Hero also created basic robotics. He mostly used his automatons to put on plays. His biggest achievement: a completely automated play that lasted for more than ten minutes. Supposedly each segment of the play had two different settings and could do different things depending upon how it was arranged (binary, anyone?). Apparantly it wasn't bad either, according to: Techgnosis: Myth, Magic & Mysticism In The Age Of Information.

Hero was not just an engineer - he was supposedly brilliant at mathematics and a great theoretician. He came up with the basics of Fermat's principle. He came up with the basics of optics which supposedly weren't improved on for a thousand years (by the Arab scientist Alhazen). He discovered Hero's formula and imaginary numbers. He played with the Pyramidal Frustum (here's the Wolfram|Alpha link if you're so inclined - it's basically a pyramid with the top chopped off).

He may even have invented wind-powered machinery. Nobody's quite sure about that. There just doesn't seem to be much in the way of information about them before he showed up.

(A source for Heron is here.)

So, 2000 years ago a prototype steam engine was created. Then what happened? Civilization declined.

It was 1600 years before the steam engine was effectively reinvented and put to use.

If we would stop listening to the banality of the herd, who are concerned only with their preening fucktardisms and the latest stupidity from the Cuntdashians, we might have traveled to the stars by now. We might have colonized other worlds. We wouldn't be limited to a single planet that we are currently polluting in various ways. We wouldn't be in the social situation where we are now.

The herd sucks.

Social media - the voice of the herd - sucks.

Doxing is a Female Tactic

According to Wikipedia:

Doxing (from dox, abbreviation of documents), or doxxing, is the Internet-based practice of researching and broadcasting personally identifiable information about an individual. The methos employe to acquire this information include searching publicly available databases and social media websites (like Facebook), hacking, and social engineering. It is closely related to cyber-vigilantism and hacktivism. 

Doxing may be carried out for various reasons, including to aid law enforcement, business analysis, extortion, coercion, harassment, public shaming and vigilante justice. [Emphasis mine. - BPS]

So there you have it, doxing is merely another shit-fucker tactic in the social arsenal of teh wimminz. It is "socially acceptable" for them to use it against each other and men, yet definitely not for men to use it against teh wimminz. By extension, as proxies of their femicunt masters, it is semi-okay for Manginas and Social Justice Warriors and White Knights to use in the service of their masters - against other men only.

What got me thinking about this was the weird semi-shit-storm of doxing that went on in the Manosphere for a short time. When the Manosphere starts using female tactics against itself, you can smell the stinky-shit somewhere. We also saw the femicunt-style shaming focused on MGTOW that went on for a bit - though we finally figured that it was all about parasites getting shitty at the thought of missing out on $$$.

So, should we (as in, the Manosphere) be using doxing tactics against the mainstream social mongrels? I'm basically undecided on the question. "All's fair in love and war." - which I'm tempted to call a female meme. Plus it's a nasty thing which can bounce back and slap us in the face. Especially when a woman can do no wrong, and so gets instant favoritism from the biased courts and society when she wants to kick up a fuss.

Though it is kind of amusing when a woman gets all shitty knickers-in-a-knot about it happening to her - in retaliation for her doing it to someone. Tit for tat hurts don't it.

Bromance, No Homo, and Slash

Commentor Anonymous over on Uncle Bob's came out with this comment (regarding the German Pilot who crashed a plane with all hands aboard):

Well, the guy was a pilot after all. I thought that women regarded pilots as being sexy, adventurous and attractive? I thought pilot was one of the "sexy occupations" for men, like doctor, cowboy, fireman, 50-Shades-of-Grey billionaire, etc., that women dreamed of. So to go off thinking that this man had problems attracting women and was an "omega" guy without any other information is bizarre (the guy looks ok in that picture with the golden gate bridge (no homo)). Was the guy recently divorced or broken up with a girlfriend?

My emphasis the "no homo".

What immediately struck me was that a completely anonymous commentor still felt the need to add "no homo" when (presumably he) stated that the pilot looked okay in his picture.

Thinking back on things, I've heard guys say that they have a "bromance" with another guy. As in "me and him have a bromance thing going on". Were these guys homosexual? No. They used the word to describe a deep male friendship. (A word that I've only heard in the last half-decade - though that might simply be NZ being isolated from the rest of the world.)

Then I had a think about "Slash" fiction. This is basically fan-fiction (usually by women) where the male friendship of a pair of well-known characters in regular fiction is characterized as strongly homoerotic. Sometimes the fan-fiction has it changed (twisted?) to a flat-out homosexual relationship. (Notable example: Kirk and Spock from the Star Trek series.)

Interesting.

So this appears to be more evidence of the poison going on in society: the pathologization of male-male friendships. Society seems to be surreptitiously getting across the idea that all male-male friendships are essentially homosexual in nature. The triple concepts of bromance, no homo, and slash are all some evidence towards it. There are probably more that I don't know of or recognize.

It would seem that no heterosexual guy wants the slightest hint of homosexuality in his male-male friendships. In his gut he likely feels that this (homosexuality) is wrong on a deep level - if he felt otherwise then he'd possibly have homosexual leanings himself.

Note that I'm saying "it would seem" and "likely feels" because I have no data: only my own gut feelings. YMMV. Try to use your own perspective on this, rather than reflexively using the herd-socially-approved-groupthink of equalism, equality, tolerance, etc that has been drummed into you via the modern leftist/socialist school system that we've been forced to endure.

At any rate, this seems to be another method of controlling males: if you demonize male-male friendships, these bonds never form, the male is left isolated and alone with no male support group. All the better prey for the female to control in all ways. Especially when you see the loss of a mans friends once he becomes married - until his "friends" become the socially-approved emasculated husbands of the wifes friends.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.
=================
Note: Back in the post on LGBT are Dodo's, I stated that they are biological dead-ends and attention-whores. If they're quietly telling you their sexual preferences (and you're not family) then they're probably interested in hooking up with you and think you might be interested. When they go out into full-on "shout it to the world" then they're just attention-whoring for the social-pass that these minorities have.

Maximum Emotional Pain

In my post on dumping a woman, I stated:

Notice that it's all right if she makes him feel like a piece of shit. It's totally not all right if he makes her feel like a piece of shit. It's all about her and how she feeeeels - besides, men have no feelings to be hurt, they're just a fuckin' animal/slave made for women's benefit.

Which is funny when you look at it, because women go for the fuckin' jugular of causing maximum emotional pain when they want to. With a complete disregard for any consequences. After all, it's all about her and how she feeeeels.

Never mind the nasty, warped, pathetic emotions of him. He's just a man. He's not relevant.

So obviously, they do recognize that men have emotions. They'll sure as shit go for them, sink in the teeth, claw out his guts, etc. Hell, every time you hear about a nasty frivorce or the nastiness that goes on with child custody cases. Weaponizing the children, using them to get back at their ex-hubby, all that good stuff.

I think it's more a case of they recognize that men do have emotions - and manipulate them ruthlessly. It's another cognitive disconnect. Wimminz emotions have relevance, mens emotions are utterly irrelevant. Except as a handle or weapon to be used against him.

Try imagining from the inside the kind of cold-hearted ruthlessness that women display. We know it happens, we hear about it all the time. Try to understand the kind of nastiness that must be hidden inside a woman - every woman you see that is frivorced - as she's out there acting all sweetness and light, trying to lure her next man. Even if it's just for a quick fuck. When she's done that in her past.

Predatory indeed.

Only the utterly delusional can love that or use it for more than getting their rocks off.

One final thought - you will not be able to beat a woman at the emotional pain game. She's a past master at it, you're just a rank beginner. It's like this:

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™ - only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Female Herdthink Turns on Famous in NZ

Alright, I haven't really followed this - mostly because I never bother watching TV. In fact I only learned this during smoko yesterday, the female herdthink was all *hatehatehate* at full outspoken volume.

That said, it gives me pleasure to hear that a pair of fucktard judges on NZ's "talent show" known as X-Factor managed to shaft themselves good:

Natalia Kills and Willy Moon Fired from X-Factor NZ

It took about 1 day after they launched into a tirade against a "slightly retarded" contestant. I haven't really bothered to find out the full furor. You can get the gist at the above link if you give a damn about the media-spin and social bushwah.

It is very interesting seeing one of the twatter's that a fellow-judge spouted out about Natalia Kills:

Blatt tweeted: "Ive tried to keep my cool and stay professional but really @nataliakills ? Sorry love , you're a twat".

You can still see that he's [Ed. She. See comments, thanks for the info. - BPS] being careful for the social media aspect ("sorry love") - yet calling her a twat (stupid cunt) is a pretty good one in my book. From what I've heard in the public about it all, that pair are lucky if they get out of NZ alive. Some of my muso friends would like to strangle the pair.

Goes to show that even the rich and famous can fuck it up good. Especially when they target a minority.

A word of warning though: if you're outspoken, still be damn careful about who you're targeting. Ragging on the wrong target can get you hung out to dry pretty damn quick, once the female herdthink turns against you.

Feminism Expresses Endless Rage

Consider it (feminism) to be a bottomless pit of hatred and loathing.

Spewing out bile upon their designated targets.

Simply read some of the titles of their various works (if you have a strong stomach and a bank vault for a mind you can even read the books themselves). Simply look at some of the youtube clips out there (even the thought of them tires me out).

You can imagine Feminism to be a variation of hydrophobia, one which hopefully will destroy itself like any "bad" parasite or disease. Burning itself out from lack of hosts to spread it's virulence to.

Just have to wait it out. Though sadly: it will be far far too late for most of us men.

Why Women Shame

Why Women Shame: This includes women, feminists of both sexes, Marxists, and leftists in general. They all seem to have the need to attempt to make people fall into line with their herd-approved thinking. I'm not certain, it's almost as if they are threatened by independent thought. At any rate they will often come out with blanket attacking statements like:

• you're shallow

• you have issues

• you're crazy

• you're wrong

• I don't like you

And many other ad hominem personal attacks of various types upon someone's character. You can tell simply from noting this type of attack upon the character of the person(s) being targeted. When I notice these types of things, I attempt to try and figure out what their motive behind these attacks might be (if I'm not blindsided by surprise). Invariably it is to shame someone into line with the attacker's thinking.

There are also often blanket pre-emptive defensive statements along the lines of:

• I'm not doing X, what would be the point?

This is a very disingenuous and dissimilating self-defense, very amusing once you catch it. As if simply saying "I'm not attacking him, what would be the point?" can actually smokescreen and hide the attack.

It actually might - IF you are not aware of this tactic. Simply noting that someone is attempting this form of smokescreen "I'm not doing X" when they actually are, is an instant red flag that they're trying to be sneaky and their words need to be analysed very carefully. You need to determine their ulterior motive.

As per my post about Making the Effort, whenever you see these types of statements and arguments: take them with a grain of salt. Try to find the reasoning behind them. When you can see the attack, when you can see through the smokescreen, is when you can start seeing in what way the attacker is attempting to trick/force you to think.

One of the best attacks that I ran into: "It is not appropriate to psychoanalyse someone in a debate." This turd was thrown at me by a female who was attempting to browbeat me into submission online - a typical troll attack that I eviscerated and analysed so that others could learn from it.

It is ALWAYS appropriate to psychoanalyse someone. That's how you figure out their motivations, where they're coming from, and can counter any bullshit snow job that they're attempting to pull on you. Snow jobs like the combination defensive-attack statement that it's not appropriate to psychoanalyse them.

Catch them out in their bullshit and they will hate-hate-hate you with a passion. They loathe being caught. Especially they loathe being caught out in their bullshit and getting called out on it. Nobody likes being manipulated - conversely it's embarrassing to be caught out manipulating someone.

As an aside, BPD/NPD types seem to be highly prone to flying off the handle when caught out. Which is a brilliant reaction - when someone is reduced to swearing and physically striking out, they have no rational answer to you. All that's left to them is falling back on irrational emotional browbeating and screaming and physical abuse and the like.

Which sadly, far too many men are "nice" and fall into that trap, instead of slapping their faces off when they try it. Be aware of the PC domestic abuse shit, that's a whole new layer of crap if you're married to the whack-job.

Which unfortunately is very common in these degenerate times. Note that their female friends will invariably support them, continuously, to the point of utter stupidity and ostracising you for daring to speak out. It is a brilliant exhibition of herdthink that you should always take careful note of. You (and they) are known by the close friends that you keep around and support verbally and physically.

At any rate. I think that my motivation with this post is to help you see through these attacks, to counter them, to attempt to learn the reason behind why the person is making the attack, to let you make your own decisions about what you think and believe. At least, that's what I'm saying my motivations are.

Remember though. You cannot trust my stated motivations. I could be lying for some reason, in order to throw you off the track, put up a smokescreen, do a snow job on you, and trick/force you into thinking how I want you to think.

Only you can decide.