Democracy My Ass

Everyone goin' on about de-mock-racy, de-mock-racy, de-mock-racy.

De-mock-racy is failing! It's failing, I tellya! We needs ta vote in someone to fix the problems!

Horseshit.

We live in a plutocracy.

Plutocracy or plutarchy, is a form of oligarchy and defines a society ruled or controlled by the small minority of the wealthiest citizens. The first known use of the term was in 1652.

Go look it up on Wikipedia or Infogalactic.

Defines the political system of the West 100%.

Of course, it's not a "pure" plutocracy. Oh no! It masquerades as a de-mock-racy, a front to hide the bullshit and lies. A complete mockery.

Because when it costs several million dollars for someone to "run for office", it's only the fuckers who have the $$$ who get there. Just give the retarded "public" the illusion of having a choice in the matter.

Who do you choose:

* Candidate A, a democrat with $$$

* Candidate B, a democrat with $$$

* Candidate C, a democrat with $$$

* Candidate D, a republican with $$$

* Candidate E, a republican with $$$

* Candidate F, a dark-horse "independent" republican with $$$

All just pigs vying to see how long and how much they can get their snouts in the tax-gravy of the public fuckin' trough.

Now, if you're lucky, you get the chance to "vote" in a more realistic pig who actually decides to give cleaning the mess up a solid go. Because it's no fuckin' use having $$$ if everything is going to hell in a handbasket and the $$$ become as worthwhile as the currency of Argentina and Zimbabwe. Or the country actually turns into Argentina and Zimbabwe.

Especially when the other fuckin' pigs are too fuckin' stupid to see the shit-on-a-shingle that's coming in the future, clear as day and broadcasting every-fuckin'-thing so bright and loud that even the half-awake voters can see what's in the pipeline. (Not the leftists. Those fuckers are asleep at the helm. Nobody home, you betcha.)

Brought to you by a bleak look through Crap-Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.

Importing The Dregs aka Why Racism Is Good

Eyes, balls, brains - all present and accounted-for. This is gonna offend a shitload of people, most especially all those infected with the leftist-feminist-marxist crapola thinking. Including those who believe in Democracy, in being fair, in committees...all that shit that teh herd uv wimminz live-and-breathe. Hold tight and lets see how far down this rabbit-hole of thinking goes.

I've already written about the exporting and importing of social mores in my Social Transport post. Also the transport of civilization and ideas in my Social Microclimate post.

So, with the importation of crappy refugees and their shitty mores and morals and ideas - coupled with a self-wanking self-abasement mentality of "I am more tolerant than you / no I am more tolerant than you / no I am more tolerant than you" by those who lurve, lurve, lurve being cuckolded - we have things like the Rotherham sex-slave ring that goes on for 20 years with a blind eye turned by the local Bobbies.

Now I'm going to turn around and say that you can't entirely blame the local Bobbies for letting this go on in their patch. The reason: the local lefties and wanktards and jackoffs would not have believed them. It does not fit their mental narrative, their mental map of reality, therefore it does not exist. Try to tell these whack-jobs any different and you'll find yourself fired and blacklisted for good.

Realistically I wonder how many of the local Bobbies did get fired, or "voluntarily retired", after not being believed. A self-perpetuating misery that they were stuck in, with no other way out. My gut feeling is that there were a few good men who got out because they couldn't stand the shit. Something that the media wouldn't report on, because that "doesn't fit the narrative".

Leaving only the crap who can delude themselves that it's okay, or who will actually take advantage of the shit-sandwich. The good Bobbies are gone, forced out, leaving only the shit-awful remains of Bobbies to not-protect their local slice of society. So much for that Social Microclimate, gone way down the clappers with a huge sucking and flushing sound.

So we have imported the dregs of another society, to fuck up our own lives. You can imagine the relief of their leaders: "At last, we have a dumping-ground for our trash and criminals. We'll call them refugees and those morons will beg us to take them in. It's genius!"

What's next, we in the West start bidding on these "refugees"? Buying slaves that are not slaves? Just to satisfy some sick'n'twisted publicly-seen do-gooder crap in our otherwise empty lives?

Now, those who emigrate on their own to get away from a shithole? On the whole they are gonna be good people. They've gotten it together enough to voluntarily move lock-stock-barrel away, have a money-and-life-building mentality, have chosen a better country and society to move to, and generally know what the fuck they're getting into. They're expecting different culture and are prepared to adapt to it.

Refugees? Nah. They expect us to bend over and take it up the ass whenever they want to give it to us. These are not good imports into our society and country - worse, it's all encouraged by the self-wanking self-abasing leftist pricks referred to above.

So I might like individuals - and loathe the people from the country as a whole. You can go there and see why: the dregs are roaming around. Travel broadens the mind: yet once you've done it for a while, you start to realize that you're exposing yourself to some really whacked-out assholes who have wildly divergent belief-and-action-systems than you have. This is why you end up getting mugged while walking down the street in some second- or third-world country.

Because you're not used to thinking that every idiot on the block is looking to pick your pocket - or knock you over the head for a few bucks. You forget for a moment. Similarly, this is why foreign brides probably do so well with Western men: we're not used to thinking that despite her good looks and nice behavior, she's still a parasite looking for a man to leech off. (Especially those who can and do get divorced once they become citizens. Dipshits with multiple Russian brides who never learn from it. Sheeeeit.)

Which all brings us around to the roots of racism. Let's look at Wikipedia on racism:

Racism consists of ideologies and practices that justify or cause or perpetuate unequal treatment of groups or individuals based on criteria of perceived racial or ethnical difference. These can take the form of social actions, practices, beliefs, or political systems (e.g., apartheid) that consider different races to be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other, based on presumed shared inheritable traits, abilities, or qualities. It may also hold that members of different races should be treated differently. Some variants include a belief in hierarchies of worth arising from biological differences between peoples.

Which is why the leftist-fucktards absolutely loathe racism: it goes against their narrative of nicey-nice "why can't we all just get along" equalism lunacy. Racism is prejudice against others for whatever reason.

So teach that equalism lunacy to kids in school. I had two friends - the three of us were the brainiest ones in the entire school. If you think the other kids (and even the teachers) didn't pick on us 'cause we were different, you've got rocks in your head. The lunatic creed of "get along" didn't exist back then. Prejudice did, and absolutely still exists where the teachers can't see it.

Further down in the Wikipedia page it talks about xenophobia. Interesting how the leftist-crowdist dribble labels it as "irrational" and "unreasonable" dislike and fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners or anything that is strange or foreign. Again, shit on anything that goes against the narrative of nicey-nice equalism lunacy.

Using a google search, the definition of xenophobia comes out as:

dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries

Prejudice, once more. This is the key part. Prejudice. What causes prejudice?

Experience?

Going back to school. Why were the other kids and the teachers prejudiced against myself and my two friends?

Because we didn't think and act like them?

Why are we prejudiced against foreigners? Because they don't think and act like us?

Why is xenophobia labeled as being irrational and unreasonable? The leftist-fucktards have labeled it so because it makes them uncomfortable, going as it does against their creed of equalism. It screws with their delusional mental map, which must must must triumph over the territory that is actual reality. Yet, xenophobia is based in experience. Experience of others who do not think and act as we do.

I might like individuals. I loathe the race as a whole.

My loathing is because of my experience with the race as a whole - or the experiences of others that I trust somewhat. If several people say the same of the race as a whole, out of their personal experiences, I am more likely to believe that anecdotal shared experience. My liking of individuals comes about because of personal experiences with those individuals only.

I believe shared experience because these experiences come from my people who think and act the way that I do.

Irrational and unreasonable, my ass. It's totally 100% rational and reasonable. No matter these leftist-fucktard pricks trying to blow smoke up our collective assholes, we know better in our gut.

This is the roots of "racism" and "xenophobia" - shared and personal experience. Fuck the redefinitions, absurdisms, and bullshit inflated crapola shoved down our throats by the leftist-fucktards and their self-wanking mentality. Shared and personal experience of reality. It protects us from the thoughts and actions of people who do not think and act in the manner that we do.

This is why Racism Is Good.

It's also the roots of our freedom to associate only with those that we feel comfortable with. Try to force me to live next door to some person whose food stinks so bad that I feel like vomiting, who doesn't clean their house at all, and who just tosses his garbage in a pile outside the door? (Something that my brother has personally experienced. Fucking revolting he reckoned, with cockroaches everywhere.)

No thanks, fuck you, I'm outta here.

It's called White Flight, and is sometimes deliberately triggered by people with an agenda for an area. Amusingly, some of those people are leftist-wanktards - ideology and hypocrisy has no boundaries when it comes to $$$.

In my youth, there was a saying: JAFA = Just Another Fucking Aucklander. These days it has changed: JAFA = Just Another Fucking Asian.

As Terrence Popp states: C.U.N.T. = Can't Understand Normal Thinking, and H.O.E. = Horizontally Oriented Entertainer. (We can apply the former to all leftist-marxist-retards. Come to think of it, the latter as well...)

We in the manosphere/MGTOW arena exhibit our own prejudices aka racism - towards women. This is a prejudice/racism/xenophobia which has been brought about by shared experience. Which is why we say YAWALT - one of my first posts ever on this blog.

Too bad for you C.U.N.T.'s and H.O.E.'s. I might like some of you women as individuals, in a severely limited and ring-fenced manner ("am I fucking you? I must like you then"). I loathe and distrust the "race" of women as a whole.

Racism and Xenophobia are Good. Why? Perhaps an example will illustrate.

When I was over in Thailand for a wedding, my mate told me some things that were very interesting about Thailand:

1/ Foreigners and foreign-owned companies were not allowed to own land-and-buildings. They can lease, nothing more. I understand that it's the same in China.

2/ Foreigners have to go through a rigmarole every 3-months or so to stay in the country (perhaps including leaving and returning the next day).

3/ You can get permanent residency, which allows you to become a director of a public company. You can then become a naturalized Thai citizen, at which point you can own land-and-buildings. It's a long and involved process.

So what political system is Thailand? Constitutional Monarchy (until 2014, now it's a Military Junta - happened soon after I left).

Which tells you something about a Constitutional Monarchy. They look ahead - way ahead - and they make abso-fuckin'-lutely certain that they're not gonna do something that'll fuck up their children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren etc 1,000 years down the line.

Remember what I put on Social Microclimate about bridges and cities and overarching themes regarding urban planning, building for 200+ years ahead? These people are DOING IT. Or at the least, making absolutely certain that they're not handing it all over to some foreigner for a few pennies.

Unlike our stinking short-sighted politicians (in New Zealand, and I gather America and the United Kingdom as well). Because in their leftist-fucktard-short-sighted mind it's okay to sell out your future for a couple of bucks today. Who gives a shit, they already have their snout in the fuckin' trough. Never mind the childreeeeeeen...

So why are our fuckin' politicians like this?

It's simple when we think about it. Politicians are only concerned with getting elected this term/next term. They have their snouts in the public trough as long as they can possibly manage it - ditto for the (un)civil servants and bureaucrats who maintain them: "100 years down the line? Don't make us laugh mate! 10 year plan at best!"

Crass and overt short-term greed, lies, backtracking - all manifest, certainly not hidden. So how do they get elected?

Teh wimminz vote, and the quisling male suckups trying to get some pussy by following teh wimminz vote and proclaiming that they followed teh wimminz vote.

Democracy in action. A bunch of spoiled fuckin' children voting free benefits for themselves. Never mind reality. The greedy and self-serving politicians follow along, paying lip-service for their own personal gain.

Hang the future. Hang reality. Hang the childreeeeeen...

So, a definition of Democracy:

Democracy, or democratic government, is "a system of government in which all the people of a state or polity ... are involved in making decisions about its affairs, typically by voting to elect representatives to a parliament or similar assembly," as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary.

All the people. So who has the loudest and most numerous voices? Oh yeah, teh wimminz - just listen to Big Red aka Chanty Binx aka Feminazi Cunt saying "SHUT THE FUCK UP..." a few dozen times.

We've already established that most women Can't Understand Normal Thinking. IE they can't understand reality at all - and have screaming shit-fits when you try to explain it to them ("you're mansplaining to me! that's abusive!"). The delusional map in their head overrides it, though sadly not to the point where they think that gravity doesn't exist and they step off a cliff expecting to fly...though there is a small amount of delusion, which is why many of them are gravitationally challenged.

So a better definition of Democracy might be:

The loudest voice and the most votes dominating the government and therefore making decisions about the country as a whole.

Which is kind of frightening when you look at this picture and start playing "connect-the-dots":

Look at the 115 IQ point, the upper boundary of "normal" intelligence (one standard deviation away from the mean of 100 IQ). Check the bottom row: 84% of people are "normal" or lower.

So the average person Can't Understand Normal Thinking...and votes in free bennies for themselves...and the politicians and bureaucrats go along for the ride 'cause they want their noses in the trough...

So I guess that we can understand why a lot of people prefer to not play "connect-the-dots" and would much rather remain in an unthinking state or checking out of society entirely, going ghost. Because it's FUCKING AGGRAVATING when a BUNCH OF FUCKING MORONS goes around playing HOLIER THAN FUCKING THOU MIND-FUCK GAMES WITH US.

Especially when those mind-fuck games involve denying that what I can see with my own eyes is real. And that I should bend over and take it up the ass like a good little fellow-moron. And that it's good for me. And that I should both enjoy it and feel privileged that I'm taking it up the ass from them like a good little slave should.

So I'm given a job to do at work. It's going to fail. Why? Because I have no authority to say "get 'er done" to the retards that I'm supposed to be dealing with. Fucking committees and their endless circle-jerk wanking off. No problem though: I can simply push it upstairs, telling them that in my view it's ready to go when they give the word. Even better, I am completely bypassing the pathetic female herdthink paranoia of covering their ass and obsessive nit-picking and polishing a turd until it gleams like gold. No two years of this shit. It's ready, fuck your "committees" and "decision-making".

So I propose doing various regional functions to a group of people. They start going all gooey-eyed over it, wanting to do "committees" and "raising participation" and having "meeting groups" and shit like that. We've got a month to get this crap done. No fucking way. Regions that're interested, put up your hands. Fine. You need to do X and Y. I will do Z plus put together some artwork to run past you. The artwork gets cut back for various reasons, but hey, the goddamn functions are on-track and ready-to-rock.

Meanwhile these Can't Understand Normal Thinking people are out there having a little snit-fit, noses outta joint, 'cause I told 'em to go fuck'emselves. Cry me a river, morons. The job's getting fuckin' done without your "participation" and similar bullshit bogging it all down in Idiocracy.

Dictatorship or Monarchy, one person in authority making the decisions, beats Democracy hands-down. Mostly because Democracy is constantly laying on it's back, taking it like a good little Horizontally Oriented Entertainer.

Or a slave taking it up the ass.

And this-all is why racism is good...xenophobia is good...and democracy sucks monkey-ass.
---additional---
It just occured to me, there is another "social construct" which devolves to the lowest common denominator and runs on emotion. A mob.

Runnin' riot through our civilization...

The Roman's gave out their dole of grain and free entertainment in the form of circuses. All to desperately pacify the mob.

Why Social Media Sucks

No, not just because it acts as narcissistic supply for the typical modern whore.

No, not just because it's filled with banality.

It's because everything you say can and will be used to destroy your life.

It's because of people like this entitled bitch using it as a platform for her lies to destroy a Nobel Laureate's career (I'm cherry-picking from the article, read the whole thing for yourself):

On Monday, June 8, a British academic called Connie St Louis uploaded a sensational document to her Twitter feed. Beginning with the question ‘Why are the British so embarrassing abroad?’, it offered an account of bizarre remarks that a Nobel Prize-winning biologist by the name of Sir Tim Hunt had made earlier that day at a conference in Seoul, the capital of South Korea.

Within hours, Sir Tim was being hauled across the coals in newspapers and TV bulletins across the world. Unable to defend himself, since he was travelling back to the UK, the bespectacled professor’s only response was delivered via a voicemail message to Radio 4’s Today programme recorded in haste via mobile telephone in Seoul airport.

Then, early this week, the simmering dispute took a further, seismic twist.

It came courtesy of The Times newspaper, which revealed the contents of a leaked report into Sir Tim’s fall from grace compiled by an EU official who had accompanied him to the Seoul conference.

This individual, who has not been named, sat with him at the lunch and provided a transcript of what Sir Tim ‘really said’.

Crucially, it presented a very different take to the one which had been so energetically circulated by Connie St Louis.

Strangely, given that there were more than 90 other journalists present at the fateful lunch in Seoul, no other detailed accounts of the toast have emerged.

And then it turns out...

Perhaps, therefore, we should ask two other related questions: who exactly is Connie St Louis? And why, exactly, should we trust her word over that of a Nobel laureate?

A good place to start is the website of London’s City University, where St Louis has, for more than a decade, been employed to run a postgraduate course in science journalism.

Here, on a page outlining her CV, she is described as follows:

‘Connie St Louis . . . is an award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist.

‘She presents and produces a range of programmes for BBC Radio 4 and BBC World Service . . . She writes for numerous outlets, including The Independent, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The Sunday Times, BBC On Air magazine and BBC Online.’

All very prestigious. Comforting, no doubt, for potential students considering whether to devote a year of their lives (and money) to completing an MA course under her stewardship. Except, that is for one small detail: almost all of these supposed ‘facts’ appear to be untrue.

All neatly illustrating that the herd as a whole is as stupid as bricks and doesn't deserve a voice (in fact the majority of these morons need to be muzzled).

Also neatly illustrating why anyone who uses FaceCrap, Twatter, and InstaCunt on a regular basis should be trusted almost as far as you can spit a mouthful of fishhooks.

Finally, very much illustrating how even academia will turn on each other in the moment that any kind of leftist distortion of an unfavorable type gets mentioned about any one of their own members - even one of decades good standing and tremendous contributions to science.

Oh, here's a picture of the award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist entitled bitch who started this shit-storm of what appears to be lies:

The Herd, in it's hatefulness, destroys itself and progress and anything good.

=========================

Lets do an additional aside here. You've probably heard of Leonardo da Vinci.

You may have heard of the Antikythera Mechanism. It's an ancient analog computer which was designed to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calendrical and astrological purposes. Also for the Olympiads, the cycles of the ancient Olympic Games. (From Wikipedia.) Yeah, they had brass gears and the like before 100BCE. It wasn't until the 1300's that they got "reinvented" again.

You may not of heard of Hero, though.

In case you didn't hear of him, the Greek inventor Hero (Heron) first invented the steam engine (the Hero engine, or aeolipile) in 10CE. Now, there wasn't much bloody use for it in Alexandria so it never really took traction as it were. Until you realize:

The ancient world had a number of rudimentary railways. Of course trains didn't run on them. They were grooved paths which had vehicles pulled, probably by a mix of horses/humans/gravity. The most famous was the Diolkos, crossing the narrowest section of the Isthmus of Corinth and allowed ships to be quickly transported overland. It operated from roughly 600BCE and was still going in the time of Hero.

If the two - steam and railways - had been combined, goodness would have happened.

Hero also created basic robotics. He mostly used his automatons to put on plays. His biggest achievement: a completely automated play that lasted for more than ten minutes. Supposedly each segment of the play had two different settings and could do different things depending upon how it was arranged (binary, anyone?). Apparantly it wasn't bad either, according to: Techgnosis: Myth, Magic & Mysticism In The Age Of Information.

Hero was not just an engineer - he was supposedly brilliant at mathematics and a great theoretician. He came up with the basics of Fermat's principle. He came up with the basics of optics which supposedly weren't improved on for a thousand years (by the Arab scientist Alhazen). He discovered Hero's formula and imaginary numbers. He played with the Pyramidal Frustum (here's the Wolfram|Alpha link if you're so inclined - it's basically a pyramid with the top chopped off).

He may even have invented wind-powered machinery. Nobody's quite sure about that. There just doesn't seem to be much in the way of information about them before he showed up.

(A source for Heron is here.)

So, 2000 years ago a prototype steam engine was created. Then what happened? Civilization declined.

It was 1600 years before the steam engine was effectively reinvented and put to use.

If we would stop listening to the banality of the herd, who are concerned only with their preening fucktardisms and the latest stupidity from the Cuntdashians, we might have traveled to the stars by now. We might have colonized other worlds. We wouldn't be limited to a single planet that we are currently polluting in various ways. We wouldn't be in the social situation where we are now.

The herd sucks.

Social media - the voice of the herd - sucks.

All The Wells Have Been Thoroughly Poisoned

Occasionally I go over and read Donal Graeme - he's a Christian Red Pill blogger who decries Churchianity and brings up some interesting stuff. I should read him more than I do, though I'm both atheist and getting busier these days. Commentor Mindstorm recently pointed me over there to a post:

A Truce ... or Victory?

Some of the comments in there are starkly illustrative of the mindset of people still trying to get men into the game-aka-war going on between the two sexes. Commentor The Shadowed Knight resists this and states:

I am not interested in a truce. I am not interested in a war, either. Women can fight; they want that drama. Every man for himself, and this man is leaving the field. For many of us, any truce will come too late to do much good. This fight left too few decent women standing, and the effort involved in finding them is too much for me. 

The Shadowed Knight

Yes indeed, he strikes right to the core. Too few of worth, too hard to find, forget it. I'm outta here, left the other slaves on the plantation, looking for a nice pleasant fishing-hole to enjoy. Want to join me? Drop your hook over there, maybe you'll get Old Mossy who hides under the tree roots.

Of course, there's the obligatory women-centric types seeming to try and shame the men back into getting involved with them. Some are obviously women, some are a bit harder to tell if it's a feminist-oriented male or someone with other skin in the game. I will quote one female commentor:

This fight left too few decent women standing, and the effort involved in finding them is too much for me. 

Even if you found one that you were convinced is one of the few decent women left, I doubt you’d fight to snap her up. Not just you though; that applies to most men these days, including those that hang around here, despite the fact that it’s hard to find one.

(Donal Graeme did give her a mild earful for coming across as a shaming-attempt. I would not have been so mild.)

People can state what they wish. People lie.

Women, as chameleon, are nothing but lies. ("I'm not like that!" When it's evident in every push-up bra, every drop of scent, every layer of makeup, every piece of slutty revealing clothing, that she is like that. Stop lying, woman.)

This is what these fucking retards never seem to grasp. Women. Faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary, they think that opening their mouth and saying something means that Men will take it as truth. Whether it's true or not.

Bull.

Shit.

The type of mentality which comes across - as if they're entitled to lie and sincerely expect to get away with it and that men will give them the pussy-pass if they're caught out - is both amazing and disturbing. Female entitlement to the max.

Cory Doctrow once wrote a piece on MetaCrap:

Meta-utopia is a world of reliable metadata. When poisoning the well confers benefits to the poisoners, the meta-waters get awfully toxic in short order.

To paraphrase and apply this maxim to the so-called sexual marketplace:

The sexual marketplace is a world of reliable relationships. When poisoning the sexual marketplace confers benefits to the poisoners, the sexual marketplace gets awfully toxic in short order.

Women have very thoroughly poisoned the sexual marketplace. It has been for their personal short-term gain and not for their family's nor civilization's long-term gain.

----------

Imagine a caravan of camels going through the desert. The sun burns down, the plodding pace, the feet dragging through the shifting sands. They stop at various oases and wells, trading, getting water, fresh food.

One particular village realizes that caravans are very profitable and poisons a well, luring in caravans. Those who go there die, their carcasses stripped, the bodies hidden away before the next caravan arrives. Several other villages note the prosperity of this village of robbers and decide to emulate them. The mentality spreads to yet other villages. Soon, all of the villages are doing it.

The caravan trade slacks off. Alarmed at the loss of their prosperity, the villagers get together and send out word: "We do not do these things. Come trade with us without risk."

The caravan trade picks up again. Prosperity returns to the villages in the form of more dead caravans, their corpses stripped, their bones hidden away in the endless sands.

Again, the caravan trade slacks off. Some of the villagers, deciding that they're sick of the others actions - even though they personally profited from those actions, perhaps even participated in them - split away and settle new villages.

No caravans arrive.

Surprised, they get together and have a big conflab then send out word: "We are new villages. We have absolutely nothing to do with those filthy robbers of the old villages. You can come trade with us and you will be welcome."

Still no caravans.

All the wells have been thoroughly poisoned - in the minds of the caravan-masters.
----------
Women seem to be so irrational (or entitled) that they apparently cannot grasp that men are actually rational when it comes to danger. That we see overwhelmingly common behavior. That we realize this behavior is going to be so common that we are most likely going to be subjected to it. (Is this a function of men as hunters, becoming good at recognizing danger in our surrounds and patterns of behavior in things around us?)

Plus, the whole idea of "new villages" reminds me of "born-again virgins".

Plus, the whole idea of so-called Red Pill Women stinks of the poison of personal opportunism.

A woman may not intend at all to follow this behavior.

Feelings change.

Good intentions go out the window.

Emotions take over.

You actually have the nerve to tell me you're not like that? You actually have the chutzpah to tell me you've changed? Cry me a fucking river. Woman, you lie.

Brought to you by Crap Colored Glasses™, only $1k the pair and cheap at 10x the price.