Immigration Insanity

Immigration, immigration, immigration.

I'm getting fucking sick of this insanity.

I subscribe to New Scientist, which is basically a mag with basic shit going on in the scientific and theoretical fields. It's mostly pap for the masses, but wth, it generally has a few things in it which interest me. Plus out here in bum-fuck New Zealand, I take what I can get. Whatever catches my attention I'll go digging around for more info (the life of a minor autodidact).

Now though - the pap has overwhelmed the good aka interesting stuff.

=========================

Latest cover: MIGRATION

Ooooohh shit. Here we go. Some leftist motherfuckers reasons why we should encourage more immigration. Guess I'd better read it.

Yep.

Very quick into the mag:

Migration calls for an international, enlightened response.

While it mentions Paris and Brussels (no mention of Germany) it also states:

Terrorism and economic insecurity are genuine problems, but hostility to immigrants is precisely the wrong response to them. If you look at the evidence - and there is plenty to look at - it is clear that clamping down on immigration will not solve the problems that its opponents want to solve.

SJWs and leftists always lie.

According to them, throwing out every single piece of shit leech refugee, plus building a wall, plus shooting everything outside that wall which tries to get in, plus carefully vetting and keeping a careful eye on everyone that you let through the wall - will do absolutely nothing to stop them shooting or blowing up innocent leftist/SJW citizens and raping their wives and daughters and running a child sex ring for 20 years. Damn, I never realised that.

Shit. I forgot. Profiling is WRONG. My apologies. I won't do that again. Vetting these motherfuckers in the slightest is totally out of the question.

More leftist buzzwords show up. Increasingly globalized society (find cheap slaves elsewhere to make cheap shit)...free movement of goods and services (we can buy cheap shit)...demographically challenged countries blocking foreigners desperate for jobs (harder to import slaves for the really shit-awful jobs that nobody really wants to do)...

"Immigrants expand economies, innovation, and prosperity"?!

What fucking world do these cunts live in? Immigrants bring in a poor mindset and different standards and criminal behavior. Hell, we have the Mafia and Tongs in New Zealand. That shit wasn't put up for franchise to the highest bidder, it came in with fucking immigrants. The fuckin' Pakistani's who set up the Rotheringham child sex ring hadn't had their families living in Britain for 100+ years while they soaked up good, British standards - they were fucking immigrants.

Ah, a call for an intergovernmental agency to "collect the relevant data, promote research and formulate global rules is long overdue." Jobs for the boys! More government! More taxes! Oh joy!

Excuse me while I wipe my ass with that little one-page article. Time to move on.
=========================
Radovan Karadzic (hint: the former Bosnian Serb leader) has been brought to justice through DNA work on victims, now he's starting a 40-year sentence. They've positively identified about 30,000 of the missing 40,000 from bodies, graves, etc etc. Let's have a look at ISIS for comparison:

A United Nations report highlighting the human rights violations of the Islamic State's jihadist campaign in Iraq found that while over 24,000 Iraqi civilians have been injured or killed by ISIS in the first eight months of 2014, and the extremists have taken up the practices of recruiting 12- and 13-year-old soldiers and forcing women and girls into sex slavery.

We already knew that, about the soldiers and sex slavery thing. Peculiar, is sex slavery for women and young girls endemic to that part of the world?

As of Aug. 30, the report finds that over 1.8 million Iraqi citizens have been displaced from their home due to the ongoing violence. The report notes that over a million citizens, or two-thirds of those displaced, are in areas that are under ISIS control, making it hard for humanitarian aid workers to access them.

Sheep, actually - though that is redundant. If they had any guts they'd probably be ISIS members (if you can't beat 'em, join 'em).
=========================

Skipping on to the "real" article - ON THE ROAD AGAIN! Just can't wait to get on the road again. The life I love is making music with my friends. And I can't wait to get on the road again. (Sorry Willy. Just a fuckin' trainwreck these days.) Let me see.

The United Nations says Europe faces "an imminent humanitarian crisis, largely of it's own making".

Oh, I get it! Europe caused the fighting in Syria, the rise of ISIS, and suchlike! The UN is also censuring Australia for "sending boatloads of refugees to squalid camps in other countries". Wow. Just wow. Like, wow, man.

So reading through more...bla bla bla bla bla..."Concern about immigrants falls sharply when people are given even the most basic facts" - no, they just knuckle under when you browbeat them into submission with your emotive leftist crap. Oh, this is a goodie:

One analyst even says that removing all barriers to migration would be like finding trillion dollar bills on the sidewalk.

Zatso? Zimbabwean trillion-dollar bills? 'Cause ya know, they're so enlightened and progressive that trillion-dollar bills worked out just fine for them. (h/t to Wikipedia for the pic)

Reading on. "Globalization has lifted millions out of poverty" - because 10 cents an hour to them is big bucks. "Several populist parties took the opportunity to warn of a flood of freeloaders at the gates" - I'm reminded of an old Mad Magazine comic, where a guy comes to America to see the sights and a gullible American citizen starts pointing them out to him (it ends with the guy saying with a shit-eating grin: "No, no! You no understand! Where is welfare office?")

A little insert: "The origins of xenephobia". It states:

All the evidence suggests that migrants boost economic growth.

Citations, please. Just stating that doesn't make it true. (Plus, SJWs and leftists always lie.)

(In the past.) Anyone displaying different cultural markers was likely to be a competitor.

They got *that* right, which is why I wrote that post about racism and xenophobia being good. These things protect you and yours from the kind of shitbags who blow up innocent SJW/leftist civilians and get your underage daughters addicted to drugs in a sex slave ring.

On second thought. Maybe they're right. Maybe that racism and xenophobia is really a bad thing. Maybe we should actually embrace these diverse people and every nuance of thought that they bring to the table. Perhaps turning our women and children into sex-slaves isn't a bad thing after all.

Some more drivel about more people expanding the economy - yes, we need more government workers organizing and administering aid to refugees.

In a survey of 15 European countries, the UN's International Labour Organization (ILO) found that for every 1% increase in a country's population caused by immigration, it's GDP grew between 1.25-1.5%.

Study and controls, please. In comparison to what? What if the 15 countries had not had such immigration - would the GDP growth have been smaller? The same? Larger? Where's your statistical comparison?

The World Bank estimates that if immigrants increased the workforces of wealthy countries by 3%, that would boost world GDP by $356 billion by 2025.

Again, in comparison to what? Define wealthy countries? How about some hard numbers on exactly the amounts of people involved? Was there a rise in crime with these immigrants?

Removing all barriers to migration could have a massive effect.

What, to jobs as a suicide-bomber? It's only short-term employment, ya know...hardly high-paying and skilled work...

A meta-analysis of several independent mathematical models suggests it would increase world GDP by between 50-150%. "There appear to be trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk."

Oh, totally! By the way, did you take out the GDP contributed by all the scientists and high-end engineers and those who really get shit done? After all, they will get blown up by the suicide-bombers or killed off by ISIS as undesirables - the remainder will also get taxed massively to help the "poor, innocent refugee's" to get started in their newfound home.

In the end, I suspect that the 70 virgins these retards get will be like this...

...or their fellow (male) suicide-bombers.

=========================

I'm done. I just can't bring myself to mock this any more. It's an exercise in futility - again, these morons are doubling down on the stupidity.

I get the impression that you could kill one of these morons every minute, and they'd still increase their numbers faster'n you could kill them. Maybe we need a "Hunt an SJW" and "Hunt a Leftist" season.

Time to go have a sip of grand marnier, then bed. No, I will not bother buying New Scientist any more. They are nothing more than another leftist sounding-board. The signal-to-noise ratio is too pathetic for it to be worth the money.

Doubling Down on Fucking Stupidity

Fucking leftist fucking morons. These C.U.N.T.'s used to be the fucking commie party in NZ. These shitheads may as well sell the mother-fucking country straight-up to the fucking Chinese for $1 billion then scarper off to drink pina colada's in the fucking Cayman's.

As various people have stated across the manosphere: Leftists (and SJW's) always double-down on the fucking stupidity.

So Much Fail

Commentor Mindstorm links to an interesting thread:

I took the liberty to link your declaration "What is MGTOW?" in a debate with someone badmouthing MGTOW as the secular equivalent of Shakers here: 

http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-72/

Which is all good. The copyright on this blog is: "Just fucking use it, don't be so fucking PC!" Which of course opens me up wide to plagiarism and people making money off of stolen content and suchlike, but what the fuck what the fuck. Hopefully some of the thoughts and sentiments make sense to those who read them, whether they paid for 'em or not.

Any rate. I'm going to quote a comment (which was in reply to that dumbass twat named DifferentTree) and dig into it a little, use it to expose some of the MGTOW thinking - and the why of why we happen to think in this way:

Your comparison to MGTOW is a pretty good one, but I’m seeing something more depressing in MGTOW in that its a kind of totalistic defeatism which skews history to an extreme pessimism for men. Mention bringing back patriarchy to a MGTOW and they will respond that even patriarchy is pseudo-slavery to women. Thus men must become like Shakers I guess and live in the wilderness crying about how there is no possible society which doesn’t suck for them. This is extremely unhealthy and thankfully many in the Manosphere are calling this out for what it is. MGTOW are the Shakers of the Manosphere.

You really do need to read The Fate of Empires by Sir John Glubb. It's free, it's worth the reading, and - when you think about it - you will begin to see that the West (more specifically, America) is in the final, waning years of Empire. (Counting from the Declaration of Independence in 1776, America is *just about* in the final decade of the 10-generation/250-year lifespan of your typical Empire.)

Now to cherrypick and refute points.

*Skews history to an extreme pessimism for men* - there are so many reasons for this. Basic cost-benefit analysis shows that modern marriage and women are not really worth the effort. Add to that the high chances of divorce in the modern Marriage 2.0 market, plus concomitant loss of both freedom and income. Also, read The Fate of Empires - the decline period is marked by such pessimism.

*Mention bringing back patriachy to a MGTOW and they will respond that even patriarchy is pseudo-slavery to women* - true, MGTOW will definitely say this. Because it is very much a true statement. Marriage is a huge sacrifice for men. To get men to marry, there must be something worthwhile for them in their opinion.

Unless they've been brainwashed, they aren't gonna do it for someone else out of the goodness of their heart. Brainwashing someone, lying to someone, to lure or force them into a situation where they are compelled to cater to someone else's every whim for the rest of their life is nastiness (should I call it evil?) of a high order.

Thus the "slavery" comment is both relevant and true. I will go out on a limb and state that it is worse than old-time slavery because it is covert rather than being overt. Only doublethink can explain how these people are capable of lying to themselves in such a manner. I'm giving them the benefit of assuming they are lying to themselves, and are not simply paying lip-service for their own ends.

So certain men aren't just gonna say "yeah sure bring back patriarchy and I will marry those high-quality sluts with the thousand-cock stare who have taken 500 miles of cock". Which most likely means changing to some form of social construct - whether old-style patriarchy or something else - which is very simple and clear-cut, not going to be retroactively changed, and actually gives to men a hell of a lot of value to them in a manner that can never be taken away from them.

In a manner which they will believe.

Else they just won't do it.

Maybe I'm crazy for thinking this way. I have an overwelming urge to say "no duh, fuckwit" when I say things like: "In a manner which they will believe." and "Else they just won't do it." Like, d'oh! Why would they!

Would you cut your foot off because someone asked you to? Would you cut your heart out because someone asked you to? Would you hand someone half-plus of your accumulated assets and a good chunk of your income for the rest of your life because they asked you to? Does it matter if it's a man or woman doing the asking? D'oh! Why would you!

*live in the wilderness crying about how there is no possible society which doesn't suck for them* - a true enough statement in a limited way. Because most men are realistic enough to see that they're not going to be getting anything other than the short stick for a helluva long time in the current social environment. Over 50% of the voters are female, over 50% of the men in this world are brainwashed to always kiss teh wimminz ass.

That's over 75% of people in the world who will automatically vote for more bennies for teh wimminz and less bennies for teh eeeevil menz. The spirit of Benedict Arnold lives on. You poor sons of bitches in the MRA movement really don't have much chance of changing things. Good luck trying, though. I give you kudo's for the effort, even when I think you're kinda crackers.

*extremely unhealthy* - if you're only looking at the surface (include the quote above, too). On a deeper level we expose our experiences as a warning for other men who have not yet slipped up by marrying a poor choice of subpar woman. So here's a question: do you have another (sensible) option for passing this accumulated (modern) wisdom on?

Because sure as shit, the various churches have fallen down on the job of passing on the Wisdom of Ages to their parishioners. Which is why many of the religion-focused blogs themselves call modern churches "churchianity" - their function has been twisted around to help teh wimminz, in an effort to regain and retain numbers.

*MGTOW are the Shakers of the Manosphere* - interesting. Is this another "MGTOW are loser neckbeards who can't get laid" mentality? Mindstorm already pointed him to the final answer, though.

So much fail.

In some ways I get kinda amused when someone badmouths MGTOW. They seem incapable of grasping that men can make a wholly-rational cost-benefit analysis - and act upon it. That's why some of them seem to reflexively pull out what amounts to "you're just emo losers" shaming language, with a lack of self-awareness which is breathtaking.

Or is this simply that they haven't really thought it through? They're still running on the Blue Pill script that society forced down their throats, instead of taking a long/hard/painful look at reality?

The difference between marriage with a poorly-chosen or subpar woman and the lottery is that you *might* actually win the lottery. Pardon me for not buying lottery tickets: I know the odds far too well to think of it as a sure-fire road to wealth.

Yeah. Very lucky. Cash that looks-ticket in, chicky-babe. Those lips look like they've been wrapped around 100+ cocks. We know the score.

Certainly, many MGTOW would say straight out "patriarchy is still slavery for the man". Because it's true. So: do you have another option? One which doesn't involve manning up and marrying a Dubai Porta Potty, to be cuckolded at whim and frivorce-raped later on in life? Or doesn't that really register, because it only happens to other men?

(Would you cry if you found out that it had happened to you? I have been buried balls-deep in a woman's asshole within half an hour of meeting her - a woman who turned out to be married. Was she your wife? Would it bother you if she was? Do you like the thought of bringing up some thug man's children? Do you like the thought of being cuckolded?)

So.

Yes, in the old days a Man might decide to wife up some soiled dove (I forget where I read about it happening - IIRC it used to be in the Wild West/frontier). He got a lot out of that relationship, his soiled dove had to bring a lot more to the table than the average woman, because she knew that she was used-up shit and he would tolerate less. So he wouldn't do it without some huge gain (no duh!) because it's far easier and cheaper for him to simply go for a variety of young prostitutes.

But then, we already know that society considers the Dubai Porta Potties and Miriam Week's aka Belle Starr's and Debbie Does Dallas (go Bambi!) and various other sluts of their ilk to be wonderful paragons of female worth.

(How about Lisa Sparxxx, the porn "actress" who holds the World Gangbang Record of 919 guys in the same day? According to Wikipedia she's married - guess her hubby likes being cuckolded! Do you like the idea of having the "honor" of being the 920th guy to fuck your girlfriend or wife? Though in her case it's probably close to the 2,000-mark for men in that pussy.)

Fuck that shit.

To Hell with the degeneracy of the last days of our Empire.

To Hell with these unthinking morons who give you shit for using your brains.

Point them at the truth and then walk away.

Go out and live.

The Irony

So much truth. For both sexes.

Empowering Women's Sexuality

The latest in the pile of shit that women can buy to empower themselves - the SmartBod™ aka the "Smart Vibrator". From their homepage:

So now, to satirize this with stereotype huckster marketing - *ahem*:

Soon you, too, can experience the pleasure to be had by having your vagina stimulated perfectly - because our robot penis finds out automatically over time EXACTLY THE WAY YOU ACTUALLY LIKE YOUR SEX TO BE!

Be impressed! Be amazed! Be empowered!

Possible side-effects include (and are not limited to):
* inability to orgasm with normal sex
* vaginal stretching
* excessive dryness
* burning
* chafing
* itching
* rash
* pain
* erratic muscle spasms
* broken limbs
* electrocution
* death

Be aware that the normal speed of this device is 600rpm. It is not recommended that it be re-wired or altered to increase this maximum speed. Attempts to do so will automatically void the warranty and remove all liability of the manufacturers.

The manufacturer is in no manner liable for any of the above or other non-stated side-effects. This device should only be used under the close supervision of a gynecologist. Its preferred use is for treating special cases of sexual dysfunction. Overuse is not recommended.

Satire over.

Soon sexbots will be upon us. Women, you are welcome to take home your Mr Studd™. Men, we are welcome to take home our Midnight Lady™. Teh wimminz will have no need of us Men ever again - except as sperm donors and a pocket to put her hand into (good luck chicky-babe).

Just remember:

Criminal Coders

Normally I bitch about the bullshit that women pull in society. This is slightly different - though it does expose a different kind of poison going on in society.

It looks like the leftoid fucktards are now attempting to teach long-term prison inmates (from San Quentin) how to be coders:

Prison Program Aims to turn Criminals into Coders

I nearly killed myself laughing. Especially at this priceless bit from the article:

Shawn Drost was recruited by Silicon Valley venture capitalist Chris Redlitz to design the skill-building program to help reduce California's 61 percent recidivism rate.

Redlitz said he is talking to businesses that are ready to hire these people. 

"It's a large-demand industry, and to be very frank," Redlitz said, "if you can write great code, people don't care about anything else."

What planet are these dumbass leftist motherfuckers from?

Okay, I can get behind the idea of teaching these guys some new skills. Good on 'em. You gotta try something to keep them out of trouble. Plus, yes, it gives these guys hope that they can have a decent life-and-job when they get out. I'm definitely all for that.

But...computer programming skills? What whacktard thought this one up? Many of the current coding jobs are being outsourced to China, India, and Pakistan - a lot of laid-off coders ended up selling Real Estate after the DotCom shit blew up and before the housing bubble meltdown. They couldn't get jobs later, so they went where there were jobs. (Don't know what the poor bastards are doing now.)

Recently the USofA turned around and put together special H1B Visa quotas. Reason: so that companies in the USofA could hire-and-import overseas computer programmers for a song instead of paying the average $55+k that USA programmers expect. Cheap bunch of motherfuckers.

If these guys get out of prison and get into coding - good on them. I have strong doubts. I suspect that these leftist retards are really going to be training the next lot of cybercriminals.

Fucking clueless leftards.

Hire-A-Hubby and Demographic Decline

For all the Femicunt whores out there who proclaim "we don't need a stinking man" - you are correct.

You can now hire a husband for a time, to do the basic maintenance on your oh-so-lovely designer home.

Yes, you no truly no longer need a man to ruin your perfect lifetime of bliss and ease and ultra-competence. You can hire a substitute to do all the grunt-work around the house. Being a peon/hireling/slave, so long as you are paying him - you get the bliss of being able to order him around without compunction.

I consider this to be A Good Thing™. To explain: now that there is no work for the average Joe male, he can actually hire his fixing and what-have-you skills out to women.

As a man he no longer is required to compete in the "workspace" that feminism has so successfully invaded with their "you go girl" and "you can have it all" memes. He can leave all that soul-draining work to teh wimminz. Instead he can do what is most fulfilling to his inner self: building (or maintaining) something physical that will actually last and has solid worth.

Yes, he can drain teh wimminz of their oh-so-hard-eared-cash. Using that to fund his (sexist) minimalist lifestyle - well away from her.

On a more serious/less sarcastic note, I see from Unca Bob's Treehouse that Russia has a demographic time-bomb on it's hands. It boils down to them not having enough babies to keep their population up, to the point of losing several million people by 2050.

Interesting when you consider that much of the Western world is the same. In fact, the only thing bolstering the population of Western countries seems to be immigration.

Look at Japan. Demographically they already have widespread MGTOW (the Grass-Eating Men) and they're getting Crazy Cat Ladies (the Dried-Fish Women). Why do the Dried-Fish Women exist? Because:

1. absolutely nobody desires them as they are
2. they're too set in their ways (and lazy?) to change to something that is desirable

End result: demographic decline, far ahead of what's happening in the Western world. Currently there are schools which have been shut down, in the small towns. Eventually it is projected that entire towns will simply be abandoned.

Towns of now-deceased feminists, leaving abandoned designer-homes for the dregs and drug-dealers and outcasts to squat in - until their un-maintained walls fall down?

Sandman is correct, the collapse begins on the periphery of civilization. The outlying (rural) areas go. Parts of the inner areas go (Detroit?). Eventually the rich-and-privileged (and pampered) will end up living like Kings while around them the desperate and homeless are kept out by the walls of their gated communities. Long-term even the Kings will decline, as there will be no peon's to maintain (or grow) their technology.

Brings a little amusing thought to mind: property prices. On the periphery they will fall as everything declines. In the center they will continue to grow, as the richer and privileged haves crowd out the have-nots. A natural selection in towards and away from the centers of power and "culture" that we call "civilization".

This notification of the decline and collapse brought to you by Crap-Colored Glasses™. Have a sip of something alcoholic, plus learn how to brew (or distill - white lightning ought to be a killer). Me, I'm gonna have a sip of Grand Marnier and watch this slow-motion train-wreck as it happens live.