I have become so disgusted with this feminist/Marxist bullshit that it absolutely requires reversal - simply to show how full of crap it is. This is a public service, thoughtfully provided by yours truly: moi! Thank you, thank you, save your adulatory praise for later.
An easy way to rebut this horseshit is to reverse it - turn it around backwards - and look to see if it still makes any kind of sense. Lets start with some dribbling horseshit from these lunatics to analyse and rebut or expand upon:
"What is the present family based on? On capitalism, the acquisition of private property... The bourgeois sees in his wife nothing but production." -- Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto, 1848 http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html
Ah the Communist Manifesto, as penned by that destructive, hating bastard, Karl Marx himself. Let us reverse the key part of this:
"The bourgeois sees in her husband nothing but production." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Wow, ironically that is exactly how women view men: as a meal-ticket to a life of ease! No wonder that this resonates so well with women, its keyed to their inner desires and projective natures. Was Karl Marx secretly a woman, projecting her perspective upon men? Or did he know women so well that he realised that he could use their own small-souled, selfish nature to manipulate them?
"The overthrow of mother was the world historical defeat of the female sex. The man took control in the home also; the woman was degraded and reduced to servitude; she became the slave of his lust and a mere instrument for the production of children." -- Frederick Engels, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State
"The overthrow of father was the world historical defeat of the male sex. The woman took control in the home also; the man was degraded and reduced to servitude; he became the slave of her lust and a mere instrument for the production of children." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Wow, this looks to be what's happening right now. Marriage used as a vehicle for transferring wealth from men to women, both in the family and with divorce and after divorce in the form of continuing payments from the man to the woman. Just another form of slavery. Fuck, he was really on to it!
"Women are the creatures of an organized tyranny of men, as the workers are the creatures of an organized tyranny of idlers." -- Eleanor Marx, 1886 (Eleanor was Karl Marx's youngest daughter)
"Men are the creatures of an organised tyranny of women, as the workers are the creatures of an organised tyranny of idlers." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Ahuh, more modern slavery.
"Feminists have long criticized marriage as a place of oppression, danger, and drudgery for women." From the article, Is Marriage the Answer? by Barbara Findlen, Ms Magazine, May-June, 1995
"Feminists have long criticised marriage as a place of oppression, danger, and drudgery for men." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Ironic, given the dangers of marriage for men these days.
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan
"I feel that 'woman-hating' is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Mmmmmmmm, both statements just drip with hate. Interesting though that it is framed as "class-hatred" and not "sex-hatred". Either way, it's thinly-veiled racism. Not that thin either, for anyone with half a brain.
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage" -- Sheila Cronan
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for men, it is clear that the men's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for men cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- BlackPoisonSoul
That's an option, though we absolutely have to also eliminate any subsidies for women who have children. Otherwise us men are still enslaved, just differently - through high/extra taxes. Any woman who wants can quite happily have as many children as she desires with the bad-boys, she is quite capable of being a mother and working-woman without any oppressive help from us men.
Women do not need men for anything, including any form of support whatsoever. Feminism has taught her that, and feminism - aka other women, no matter how insanely fucked-up - would never lie to her!
"[M]ost mother-women give up whatever ghost of a unique and human self they may have when they 'marry' and raise children." -- Phyllis Chesler, Women and Madness, p.294
"[M]ost father-men give up whatever ghost of a unique and human self they may have when they 'marry' and raise children." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Ayup, quite true! This is why man should avoid women and become bachelors, rather than marry. It's also a lot more pleasant than being someone's slave.
"Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that" -- Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, "The Daily Illini," April 25, 1981
"Being a husband is an illegitimate profession... The choice to support and protect and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Apart from the obvious attack upon a woman's end-goal of lazy ease and comfort by forcing her to completely support herself from cradle to grave, it is quite correct: no man should be forced to be a father or husband. In fact, such planning is extremely detrimental for his sanity and health! Having to deal with the ongoing bratty fucktardisms from some dimwitted woman comes under the category of cruel and unusual punishment.
"The institution [of marriage] consistently proves itself unsatisfactory--even rotten.... The family is...directly connected to--is even the cause of--the ills of the larger society." -- Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (New York: Morrow, 1970), p. 254.
You can't exactly reverse this statement. However it does feed and support feminists removal of all chance for the life of ease and comfort that women want and expect from marriage. Thankfully, men are waking up to it and supporting this by refusing to oppress women with marriage.
We men also need to make absolutely sure that we do not oppress women with any form of financial support. THEY DO NOT NEED IT - feminism has told both us and them, that they actually WANT to be working from cradle to grave. They also do not need ANY help in the way of financial support - that just invites meddling in their affairs.
We are to keep our noses our of their vaginas, so in turn they can keep their hands out of our pockets. Fair's fair.
"It became increasingly clear to us that the institution of marriage `protects' women in the same way that the institution of slavery was said to `protect' blacks--that is, that the word `protection' in this case is simply a euphemism for oppression," -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 214.
"marriage is a form of slavery." -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 216.
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the Women's Movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 219.
"...the institution of marriage 'protects' men in the same way that the institution of slavery was said to 'protect' blacks...slavery...since marriage constitutes slavery for men...freedom for men cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Yep, us men need to remove ourselves from all oppression from women. No slavery for us! No oppressing women with our desires or any form of interference! Yep, you go girl - you can do it, enjoy working until the day you die! Typical woman's identification with a victim-mentality and conflation of women having it as hard in marriage as blacks had it under slavery. Odd how many women had slaves to do the housework for them, back in those days.
"If women are to effect a significant amelioration in their condition it seems obvious that they must refuse to marry." -- Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971), p. 317.
"If men are to effect a significant amelioration in their condition it seems obvious that they must refuse to marry." -- BlackPoisonSoul
This is the thinking behind the MGTOW manifesto in a nutshell. I can't fairly say that it's wrong, either: women are quite free to not marry, as are men. Simply keep your cunty mouths shut about our choice, because its none of your business what we decide - just as its none of ours to comment on yours. Your vagina, your choice - my cock and lifestyle and wallet, my choice.
"The plight of mothers is more desperate than that of other women, and the more numerous the children the more hopeless the situation seems to be.... Most women...would shrink at the notion of leaving husband and children, but this is precisely the case in which brutally clear rethinking must be undertaken." -- Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971), p. 320.
"The plight of fathers is more desperate than that of other men, and the more numerous the children the more hopeless the situation appears to be... Most men...would shrink at the notion of leaving wife and children, but this is precisely the case in which brutally clear rethinking must be undertaken." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Yes indeed! Such a clear call to abandonment and selfishness could not be better made. No wonder men are abandoning women at a great rate and getting money from them on an ongoing basis - oops, fuck, I mean the other way around. Right, well, now it's our turn to do the same. Or at least protect our own wallets from this tactic.
"Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men" -- Nancy Lehmann and Helen Sullinger, Declaration of Feminism, 1971
"Marriage has existed for the benefit of women; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over men... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of men. Therefore it is important for us to encourage men to leave their wives and not to live individually with women." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Reversed, the scent of hatred is strong. However one stupid oversight was made: it should have been a call to NEVER MARRY. In effect a celebration and endorsement of embracing slutdom and hookup culture. You go girl!
"...No woman should have to deny herself any opportunities because of her special responsibilities to her children. ... Families will be finally destroyed only when a revolutionary social and economic organization permits people's needs for love and security to be met in ways that do not impose divisions of labor, or any external roles, at all." -- Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969
"...No man should have to deny himself any opportunities because of his special responsibilities to his children." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Another call to irresponsibility and promiscuity. Slutty hook-up culture for the win, ride that cock-carousel! Missing one part though, it should have been: "...her husband and children." Then complete abandonment can begin.
"Families make possible the super-exploitation of women by training them to look upon their work outside the home as peripheral to their 'true' role. -- Andrea Dworkin
"Families make possible the super-exploitation of men by training them to look upon their work outside the home as peripheral to their 'true' role." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Have to enjoy the quotes around 'true' - nothing promotes sarcasm so clearly in text. So, what is the 'true' role of a man? A slave! So we must remove all slavery from men, setting them entirely free for all time from the oppression of women. They don't need no steenking man!
"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin
"I want to see a woman beaten to a bloody pulp with a steel-toed workboot shoved in her mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Mmmmmmmm such a delicious image - the reek of sickening hate and poison is clearly revealed from both statements.
"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo." -- Valerie Solanas http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html and http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/chance.html
"To call a woman an animal is to flatter her; she's a machine, a walking fuck-hole." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Actually I couldn't think of an appropriate insulting word that was the equivalent of incubator. Either way, the hatred drips like poison.
"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catherine Mackinnon
"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a man." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Ah, such oppression - the revealed sickness quite takes your breath away. Someone should have strangled this sick cunt on birth. At any rate, it is definitely missing the call to the destruction and removal of marriage. Quite on a par with this:
"My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter." -- Marilyn French; The Woman's Room
"My feelings about women are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the beautiful young beauty-contest winner fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in her stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What she was, as a person, I mean, what her shames and yearnings were, simply doesn't matter." -- BlackPoisonSoul
Mmm nice conflation between men automatically being Nazi-like. Funny though, I don't remember the average man being into the mass-genocide of women. Perhaps we should set up a few camps just for their extermination, so that there can actually be some truth for this conflation. I could do with a few lampshades made of female skin and some tables made of female bones, as Himmler was alleged to have done.
Do I have to explicitly state that this is sarcasm, for the fucking retarded cunts out there who espouse feminism?
Oh, wait - you're so fucking retarded that you think that feminism is actually relevant and worthwhile. The reality is that any woman who espouses these beliefs is brainwashed, stupid, taking advantage, or all three. I'm picking all three. The men who espouse these beliefs do so because they're brainwashed, stupid, think it'll get them laid, or all three. I'm picking all three.
Get back in the fucking kitchen you crazy cunt, and make me a good sandwich. None of your lip either, or you can get the fuck out and work until you die.
No fucking freebies for you!
No comments:
Post a Comment