Saturday, 28 September 2013

Cold Revenge

Captain Capitalism has an excellent post about having your revenge upon women - by not being there when they need you: Captain Capitalism: Your Revenge is Through Non-Participation

This reminded me of when I was in my first six months of swallowing the Red Pill. I left a comment on his post:
Back in my first six months of the process of taking the Red Pill I was talking with a couple of girls about men and women and dating. One girl was 27, the other 39 (I was 45).
I mentioned the old half age plus 7 years maxim for men looking at women. 39yo and I reversed it and worked out the age of men who would be looking at her: early 60s. She then confessed that on online dating sites, she only got attention from guys around 65yo and older.
I could feel her die a little inside.
I felt a strong sense of schadenfreude in that moment. The glee at the discomforture of others, coupled with a little twinge of sympathy.

Such are the slightly-bitter joys of gently, seemingly-accidentally, exposing some of the poison in society to the victims of said poison. Dispensing a little red-pill knowledge to the world can have its little rewards.

27yo now has a long-term boyfriend around her own age, she got the idea pretty quick after that talk and stopped fucking around. Even so this will be her second marriage. 39yo had a brief fling with a 30yo and bragged about it so much that she alienated most of her friends. Was a shock to her when he broke up with her - no surprise, delusions are free.

For myself: it is a beautiful spring day in New Zealand. I'm going to go enjoy it by walking down the beach.

Friday, 27 September 2013

Marriage is for Suckers

Only a sucker gets married these days. Here is why, two concepts that I've openly heard women state:

• Starter marriage

• The first time you marry is for love, the second time you marry is for money

Sit yourself down for five minutes and think about those two things. Let them sink in to your mind.

That done? Now let's examine these two statements closely. First up for consideration:

Starter marriage. So, this is like a trial. It's the first one, like a first car. Or better, a starter house. A first step on the housing ladder, a first step on the marriage ladder. "Starter" more than fucking implies that this isn't gonna last - it bald-faced says it. "In Mala Fide", in bad faith - a sadly defunct blog, though you can buy the book. The marriage contract is being entered in bad faith on the woman's part.

BONUS! She gets half of everything even if it was your work that paid for the house while she spent her money pampering herself or on expensive trips overseas.

SPECIAL BONUS! You keep paying her out of your income if the two of you had children. Or if she had a child to another guy - aka was a single mommy or got preggers to your best friend or her boss.

Starter marriage: a really sweet deal for the man.

Next up for consideration:

The first time you marry is for love, the second time you marry is for money. Now that the first marriage is gone, the second marriage is going to be to some rich and stupid motherfucker who will maintain her in comfort. Not content with stealing everything possible from her first hubby, she's taking as much as she can get from her second.

BONUS! She's had a bunch of money to waste for a few years "finding herself" (aka fucking as many men as possible) - now that is out of her system for the time being.

SPECIAL BONUS! "For the time being." She may try the process again. Or fuck around on you.

The first time you marry is for love, the second time you marry is for money: a really sweet deal for the man.

Summation:

It's an interesting thing to look at relationships through crap-colored glasses. Like the star in the movie "They Live", it's both fascinating and appalling to see the truth. The feel of rubbernecking when you pass a car-crash.

Most women are a car-crash, waiting to happen or in the process of happening or in the aftermath.

If you shackle yourself to a car-crash, then I have zero pity for you. I will rubberneck as I drive past, or sip margaritas on the deck, or fly to interesting locations.

Enjoy the taste of poison. Remember, you willingly drank it when you decided to bind yourself in a contract with someone who didn't bind themselves - who entered it in bad faith.

Thursday, 26 September 2013

What women say they want

This from a couple of the hoes in my Facebook, normally grist for extreme hilarity at the promiscuous hamsterbation which goes on:


This is so fucking wrong on so many levels. However it is symptomatic of the "feel-good" shit which is publically spouted by women. Let us examine why this is wrong:

On the surface women will go for someone who is proud and glad to have her. EXCEPT: women know inside that they're not perfect fucking snowflakes. If you're proud and glad to have her, then you don't really know her at all. Which means that you're dumb, and deluded, and clueless. Ewww.

On the surface women like the thought of someone who will take every risk and effort just to be with her. EXCEPT: that's clingy, desperate, and needy behaviour. Ewww.



Every woman in the world has taken a nasty great dump which has literally stunk the house out. Keep that in mind. Don't be afraid to say it, too. You just CANNOT worship that. The best that you can do is enjoy their company - if they're not too insane. Great inner chuckles can ensue at times, especially if you drop a little innocent comment in there that can kick the hamster into a higher gear.

You are far better off doing your own thing and ignoring her bullshit or calling her out on it. Make it damned plain that you are doing your own thing and the best that she can do is tag along for the ride. At least you keep your own dignity then.

Addendum: I posted on the original image saying that it was needy and desperate behaviour. It was censored. So I put up a post of my own calling that out, plus calling her gutless. Censor that, cunt. In dealing with these passive-aggressive bitches you need stainless-steel bowling balls for nuts.

Enjoy the poison.

Wednesday, 25 September 2013

STIs vs STDs

Here is an example of the "taming" of language, probably in an effort to fit into the Feminine Imperative regarding the celebration of slutdom aka riding the cock carousel. It probably all goes to help towards the "Man up and marry those sluts!" theme which they harp on so shrilly.

Sexually Transmitted Infections

It sounds quite benign, doesn't it. It evokes mental Images of a mother pampering a small child with a scraped knee, painting it with Dettol™ (iodine in my day) and putting a soft pad on it. A couple of band-aids complete the ensemble and the teary-eyed child gets a cuddle and a kiss and goes outside to run around and play again.

A little heartwarming memory of when we were kiddies. Infections are small things, easily fixed with antibiotics, or even that clear themselves up with time. Like the common cold, or 'flu.

This is a far cry from:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Because y'know, diseases are a helluva more serious shit than a puny infection. Diseases kill people or leave them fucked up for the rest of their natural, y'know. Nasty crap like bubonic plague, ebola, leprosy, malaria, tuberculosis, measles, rubella, polio, influenza, etc.

So AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhoea, chlamydia, herpes, hepatitis, HPV, scabies, and crabs - these are merely infections these days. Not shit that can give you genital warts, oozing sores, heightened risk of cancer to the genitals and mouth/throat, or cause you to slowly waste away and die over a 10+ year period.

Or just make you fucking sterile, forever ruining any chance of having children.

Such a relaxed word, "infection". The language has been tamed, dumbed down, so as to soothe the masses into thinking that certain things are not as risky as they most definitely are. So that people will not realise that if they're even averagely sexually active, they have at least a 50% chance of contracting HPV (alone, more if you include others) during their lifetime - and HPV is a disease that causes either genital warts or cancer.

One solo mother that I dated had a 13yo little girl - who caught an STD that left her sterile. At the age of 14 (legal in NZ with the parents permission) she was bouncing around happily, crowing about now being legal and she could now do whatever she wanted because she now couldn't get preggers. Yippee!

Fucked. Up. That relationship obviously went nowhere, with those standards being taught to her daughter. (Last I heard she has custody of and is bringing up one of her grandchildren - from her thug son, who couldn't be bothered doing it himself.)

Har fucking har.

Diseases changed to infections, to further someone's agenda. Maybe feminists WANT women sterile and disease-ridden so that they too cannot breed? So that men will pass them up as fuckable material, let alone marriageable material?

Enjoy the poison. Ignore the politically-correct terms for things. Call them Sexually Transmitted Diseases and don't hesitate to rub someone's nose in it if they try to correct you. You're doing everyone a favor.

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Hypergamy in Action

The background: An older woman, excellent shape (she works out fanatically), awesome dancer, definitely pretty for her age (I'd give her a 6 on the scale - when younger she was a fucking hot stuff blonde). She is now 51 years old.

She's been married to her hubby since they were teenagers, they've been through a ton of life experiences, they've gotten rich together, they've grown old together, they've retired together.

Hypergamy in action: She got bored earlier this year, they separated, she's been doing the Eat, Pray, Love thing. She found her "new love" and they are now in a "relationship".

I'm wondering how long this is going to last - then she'll be looking for her next love. Then the next, and next, and next...

Hypergamy doesn't care. Enjoy that nasty-tasting poison, take it to heart kiddies, before you get married or trust in a woman for anything.

Hypergamy doesn't even care about her age.


I like the way your tongue scrapes, Captain Alphacat.

Monday, 23 September 2013

Crazy Crap

From PostSecrect, more lunacy:


Ah, women! Best Friends Forever! Gotta love the frenemies dynamic between these crazy cunts.


Tchtch, projection anyone? YOU try dealing with PTSD in some sane manner.


Insecurity in a woman is good. 1/ it makes her submissive (a real boner-maker for men), and 2/ it causes vagina tingles. PS vaginas may look different, yet they are still interchangeable™.


Hypergamy is a cunt, eh! This chick gets off on exhibitionism and the knowledge that men jack off to her. It also validates her self-worth in her head, probably enough to make her eventually decide on the Eat, Pray, Love route. Run, hamster, run!


That's a switch. Guy is a nutjob for wanting to get his girl preggers. But then, he's a nutjob for posting this crap. Tempted to think: troll.


Bliss after the divorce. I enjoy the same freedom too.


Wishful thinking and projection and fantasising that she is the one getting that nasty, degrading, disgusting, oh-so-illicitly-desirable vagina-wetting sex. Only a woman (or a mangina) thinks this way.

Be interesting to know if she's going to proposition the teacher too, since she's a schoolgirl. Run hamster run!


Therapy, voluntary brainwashing for the insecure dipshit. So many people in psychiatric roles are so fucked up, you're better off dealing with your own shitty problems yourself.

Psychiatrists are actually pretty damn creepy when you talk with the bastards, so abnormal in their thinking...


Hypergamy strikes again, a young student fantasising about running away with her authority-figure. Let the petals of her labia unfold to reveal her dripping vagina!


Pen-pal in prison? I wonder if this is another of those crazy women who fall for inmates and sue for conjugal visits.


Cutters, ugh! Creepy, creepy fucking minds.

Crazy people often are the best in bed, but it's like walking through cowshit: yes you can hose it off your gumboots at the door, yet why smell the shit in the interim when you don't have to?

Enjoy the fucked-up-ness and poison in the world.

Thursday, 19 September 2013

Baby Rabies

After dance last night, four of us were out having a drink at the local pub and chatting while waiting for the live music to start up. The usual talk between two men and two women who are friendly and have shared interests. Both these girls are reasonable-looking (6+ on the scale on a bad day) and I'd bang either one - so long as she kept her mouth shut.

Both girls are professionals, a Nurse and Schoolteacher. Neither girl has a boyfriend, the reason becoming evident...

Eventually the subject of children and babies came up.

Woman 1 (28 y/o): When I'm 30 I'm going to get preggers.

Woman 2 (31 y/o): When I'm 38 I'm going to have a baby.

#1: Hey 38 is too old.

#2: I don't want to be held back, I'll wait until 38. I want one!

#1: Yeah women need babies!

#2: Yep! My clock is ticking and running out. I'll go onto the DPB. (Domestic Purposes Benefit - that's WELFARE in New Zealand.)

...and back and forth for a bit...

Neither girl mentioned a thing about having a husband - no surprise given the complete disconnect between no-boyfriend-now and apparently-no-boyfriend-then. Us two guys looked at each other and then we suggested to the girls: "No problems, just have a one-night-stand." "Yeah. Easy-peasy."

#2: Oh I don't want to be a solo mum! I don't know any girl who chooses that! (Ahah!)

Him: Actually every woman who gets divorced chooses THAT.

Me: I know some actually.

#1: Turkey baster, that'll fix us up.

#2: But where do we get the semen from?

Me: A one-night stand, some random guy will do. No problems at all, just choose someone from in the bar.

Him: Yeah, why try all that hassle when you can just have a casual fling.

#1: I work at the hospital, I'm sure that I can sort something out.

#2: But that seems so random...

Quite a bit more back-and-forth, before we eventually broke up and headed off home to sleep before the next day's stuff. You can tell from the gem's above though:

* no interest in the man involved (or any man)

* no interest in actual marriage (with anyone)

* brainless dribbling about having a baby (ignoring the hassles that come with them)

* not the SLIGHTEST mention about providing a good home-life for said baby (so definitely no man involved)

These are PROFESSIONAL girls - not some stereotypical low-end dumbass girl who's so stupid that she gets knocked up by accident. They are wanting it - bad. The baby-rabies desperation smokes off them both, driving away all men who might otherwise be interested in getting to know them.

These girls are intelligent (dumb), educated (brainwashed), and have everything going for them. Except: they can't find a boyfriend let alone a husband - who they have no desire for anyway. Plus they both have a mortgage (with no intent to ever pay it off) and still have student loan debts. Plus they're both at the stage where they have only 10% of their eggs left - eggs which are getting to the point of having problems.

You know, I ask who is more successful: this prize fucking pair who are $400+k in the hole or some barely-employed girl on the DPB/Welfare with zero debt and two kiddies to different men. I think the latter.

I can taste that poison smoking off you, you idiot women. You're actually too smart to be allowed to breed.

 

Now I'm in the market for a pretty, sensible, young, and fertile woman who hasn't lumbered herself with a ton of debt that I'm supposed to pay off for her. In short supply, I suspect.

Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Groupthink

From an MBTI stance:

Feelers (generally women, some men) have no control over their emotions.

Thinkers (generally men, some women) have control over their emotions.

From interacting with many (a couple of hundred) people who are also into MBTI, one trend became very obvious: the tendency of Feelers towards groupthink.

I thought about this for a while and came to the following thought: that Feelers constantly talk over, spread the word, bounce ideas off each other, etc regarding any decision. This in an effort to reassure themselves that the decision is the correct one. They'll also go back over their thinking, ad nauseum, in an orgy of perpetual self-doubt.

The implication becomes: that they do not entirely trust their own feelings, therefore they must seek the approval of others to reassure them that yes, their feelings are correct, they are the right way to go, etc. When things go right they congratulate themselves, when they go wrong they blame others.

Thus: groupthink, decisions and responsibility (or lack of) by consensus.

It seems defective, like a stripped screw, turning endlessly, never stopping. (An assessment which was confirmed by women Feelers when I spoke of it. One said that she utterly hated it, that she had to go to others for reassurance, that she felt like a burden.)

Contrast that with a thinker like myself. I don't trust emotions either, yet I control mine. The results of my thinking tend to be trusted by myself and to heck with others thoughts. I know what I want, what I think, upon many subjects - once that has been decided its done, filed, not thought about any more. My brain can go think on something else now.

The conclusion: Feelers (mostly women) are herd animals, an assertion which is basically borne out by evolutionary psychology.

The follow-up question (I've never heard anyone articulate before) is: what kind of herd animal?

Prehistoric men used to drive mastodon off a cliff, it was an accepted form of hunting. Certainly there are no mastodon around any more. But that was a physical act, it wasn't voluntary. And you don't see most animals out there jumping off cliffs on a regular basis - other than lemmings. Interesting, every three or four years there is a mass-migration that results in the death of millions.

Now, some fucktard is sure to say: "women are not lemmings!"

They are correct, yet human society exhibits some lemming-like characteristics on the whole. Self-destructive from an evolutionary view (lowered birth rates) when civilised, choosing to breed with the least-intellectual men, the more intellectual waiting for the right time, etc. Stupidity breeds faster than brains. Look at the fall of Rome, and Sparta, etc.

Feelers breed faster than Thinkers. The current society is set up for this, so impulse-breeders have a social safety-net. In fact it is encouraged with "you go grrrrl!" and similar enthusiasms for "heroic single moms". Sadly, the lesser number of Thinkers tends to prop up the greater masses of feelers. If nothing else, Thinkers will invent things far more often than Feelers do (who tend to whine a lot, from a Thinker's point of view). We also plan ahead a lot more.

Feelers didn't make the steam engine, electricity, lighting, computers, and the like. Yes, they may appreciate these things - yet they didn't settle down and THINK them through and create them. Just like Feelers didn't think through the current social mores and law-system, beyond "it might benefit me" and "it feels good" and "that would be nice".

When you don't think, the governors come off and everything goes to shit. Then the Feelers blame everyone else for the problems - when in reality, it's their own fault for not fucking thinking.

It is sad to see our society going to shit for lack of rational thinking.

Tuesday, 17 September 2013

Equality is Lunacy

Equality, equality, equality. Piss on Political Correctness™ - it is a disease of the mind. It is a meme of inanity and delusion, filled with fluffy feel-good vibes, completely lacking in anything of true substance. It creates one thing only: mediocrity.

Apples are apples, oranges are oranges, melons are melons, and none of them are equal to the others. They're all different, they will never be the same, they CANNOT be the same. No matter what you PC twats decree with your feminist-inspired drivel - gender is NOT a social construct. Men and women are not genderless drones.

Images of Life of Brian - "I want to be a woman." "You can't be a woman, you don't have a womb!" - feminism should have withered up and died then and there!

Equality doesn't mean shit, it's a buzzword - like all the buzzwords and crapola in advertising. Apples, oranges, and melons are not equal. Stating that they are (or even that they should be) is disingenuous and lunatic in the extreme.

Similarly, stating that everyone is the same is disingenuous and lunatic in the extreme. Everybody has their own strengths - trying to develop something that you're just not good at, for whatever reason, is wasting your time and the time of others.

Example: Don't try to be a physicist when you have a 110 IQ, it's simply not your strong suit. You might be a whiz at fixing a car though! Don't try professional surfing if you have no balance, do enjoy yourself when playing jazz.

Equality is not equal. It is a dumbing-down, a cutting back, a deliberate stultifying of those who can do, so that those who can't do don't "feel bad" about their inadequacies. Inadequacies that are only in the mind of the PC motherfuckers - are these twats really fucking trying to MAKE people feel bad?

Fuck that shit. If I'm interested enough to feel bad about my inadequacies, I'll fucking work on improving myself. I'm not going to let someone else say "no you shouldn't do that" to me.

Do not fucking try to tell me how to think. Do not try to tell me how to talk. Do not try to drag me down into your bland and mediocre world, when the one that I'm building and living in is fantastic.


Neither should you let them try this shit on you.

Saturday, 14 September 2013

Lunacy Fucking Lunacy

From the chorus of completely crazy cunts:


May 2008, Jodi Arias killed her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander. How she did it: stabbed him 27 times, shot him in the head, and slit his throat (nearly decapitating him). Amnesia about the murder yet can recall minutiae about their sex acts, while her sexts/voicemails/etc with Alexander bring new meaning to the concept of "enthusiastic consent".

(For those who don't know what enthusiastic consent is, it's Feminism's moronic dribble regarding what rape and consent actually are. Basically if the girl is not jumping up and down and squealing happily for everyone within 10km to hear at the suggestion of giving her boyfriend a blowjob, then she hasn't consented to sex, therefore it is rape.

We men have to make extra-special-sure that the girl grabbing our crotch, painting the inside of our ear with her tongue, and dry-humping our leg is actually wanting and consenting to sex. Even in the imaginary genderless world of Feminism we boys have to get that enthusiastic consent from the girls. The reality-disconnect of genderlessness has yet to be exploded, and probably will never be.)


July 2013, Jordan Linn Graham pushed Cody Lee Johnson, her husband of 8 days(!), off a cliff in Glacier National Park. Initially told investigators that her husband left their home with unidentified friends in a dark-coloured car. She has been released on bond because she doesn't pose a flight risk or risk to the community.

It took 5 years to convict that crazy cunt Jodi Arias, with an enormous waste of time and money. She fought it to the end and expressed her "shock" at the final verdict. She felt that she had so much to give to the community. A couple of the beauties that she pulled out of her ass in her defence (in the form of a PowerPoint presentation):

Teach fellow inmates to read. “I know reading has enriched my life by expanding my knowledge base and opening my eyes to new worlds and different cultures. I, too, can help other women, so they can add that dimension to their lives.” <---- one crazy motherfucker, only mentions other women LOL

Sell “Survivor” t-shirts to help “other victims of domestic violence.” I fuck you not, she still claims that she was a victim of domestic violence - despite all evidence to the contrary. Yet hey, when you can do this, you can make a tremendous difference to women's lives:



Five years. How much money per year - $50+k to feed and house her? Say 4-5 high-end Lawyers wasting their time at the rate of $500k a year each? (Okay, not all the time, so say $200k a year total.) Judges having to listen to this drivel at God-alone-knows what cost? All the judicial and ancillary people who waste their time with this? Jurors wasting their time listening to this drivel?

Conservative estimate: $500k a year. Five years. A good $2.5 million cost to the taxpayer - out of your fucking taxes - which would have been much better spent on, I dunno, how about paying for some decent schooling for a bunch of kids. Maybe even decent college/university education for five promising medical students for five years, so that they don't start with $100k in student debt.

How much do you think that Jordan Linn Graham will cost? Another five years and $2.5 million dollars?

Only in a completely sick society would this travesty of bullshit happen. Only in a completely sick society would some crazy bitch even think that they could get off this type of thing.

The complete disconnect between the minds of these people, the bullshit wastage that society tolerates, and reality - is utterly astounding.

We cannot support this bullshit. It takes a tremendous surplus in production to be able to afford this load of superfluous garbage. Yet, listening to this crap - knowing that its happening - and more, we're expected to produce tremendous amounts extra to shield ourselves from these parasites - it becomes completely demoralising.

No wonder that men look at this shit and check out. Yes, this is extreme. Yes, this is not very common.

Yet, we still have crazy cunts like Whitney around - they are actually surprisingly common in the world. (Kudos to you for divorcing that childish lunatic. You the man.)
 

 

 
In what world is this behaviour considered sane, decent, and normal - because I absolutely refuse to buy into it.

When this dogshit is prevalent, there is no incentive for men to produce anything extra. The women can only, honestly, blame themselves. They did it themselves. Men, quite rationally, refuse to take it and therefore refuse to make the extra production that our shitty society needs to function in the way that it currently does.

As a society we are truly and completely fucked.

Laugh at this stupid poison...hoist a drink...and watch it all fuckin' burn.

Important MAN Books To Read

Alright, I've taken these from the following site: No Ma'am

They are converted into e-books for your convenience. I'm not charging for them. The guy who wrote the things basically said "Don't be so fucking polite, just use the shit." and I'm taking him at his word.

Lets be blunt, I don't want these to be lost if I can help it. I think a lot of other guys feel the same, though the women probably wouldn't think so (they're so misogynistic! baaaaa baaaaa mew mew meow meeeeeoooow!).

So, here's the books (so far, more may be added as I get time to convert 'em):

Philalethes
The Book of Bonecrker
The Book of Pook - includes Womanese
The Philosophy Of Men Going Their Own Way
Zenpriest

Lets hope his site doesn't go down. If it does though - I still have these damn books, and so do you. Pass them on to whoever needs them!

Update: Just added The Book of Bonecrker to the list. The Book of Pook to come. Cheers!

Update: Another worth reading.

Anti-Sexism for Idiots

Update: Just added The Book of Pook to the list. You're welcome!

Friday, 13 September 2013

Duckface

The lamest "plausibly deniable" advertisement for sexuality ever: the duckface (aka blowjob lips). You see narcissists doing this all the time, in selfies on Facebook.


Yes indeed, thank you for your advertisement - now suck my cock for me girls. If it isn't at least tickling your tonsils, let alone all the way down your throat, then you need more practice.

What's most amusing is that this behaviour starts very young: generally around the age of eleven or twelve. That's when girls start experimenting sexually. When you see a fourteen-year-old with pictures like this on her Facebook, you know that she's given quite a few blowjobs to the boys already.

It's just as good a signal as the slut with her tongue pierced - only a younger tell. This little girl will be getting a pierced tongue as soon as she can: because she likes to give blowjobs to assorted inappropriate men. The piercing is simply extra advertising signs of her sexuality, more explicit and more visible to all.

Enjoy those lips, lustfully wrapped around your cock. If not you, then she will blow someone else.

Mansplaining and Snark

Let us show the meme:


From the Urban Dictionary:

1/ "to delighting in condescending, inaccurate explanations delivered with rock solid confidence of rightness and that slimy certainty that of course he is right, because he is the man in this conversation" 

Wow no emotionally loaded terms used in that there description, eh! Plus only men are like that!

2/ "To explain in a patronizing manner, assuming total ignorance on the part of those listening. The mansplainer is often shocked and hurt when their mansplanation is not taken as absolute fact, criticized or even rejected altogether. 

Named for a behavior commonly exhibited by male newbies on internet forums frequented primarily by women. Often leads to a flounce. Either sex can be guilty of mansplaining."

At least they admit that either sex can be guilty of mansplaining. Though the explanation is primarily directed at men.

3/ "To explain something in an unnecessarily long winded way, so as to dominate the conversation, and to make statements that are not based on facts, assuming that people will believe and agree with him because he is male."

Smell the misandry from these man-haters.

4/ "Despite claims of superior strength in avoiding over-emotional reactions, when a man encounters even one iota of criticism of men on the internet, he must then mansplain why women suck by comparison or must be radical feminists.

Mansplain--to put women down in response to criticism."

Smell of more misandry from these man-haters.

Wow, way to go. I will make two predictions: 1/ mansplaining was invented by man-hating feminists and manginas, 2/ it is a direct outgrowth of female projection (projecting the behaviour they detest onto others).

Have you ever noticed, some women who explain things to a man adopt an "adult to child" condescending/sneering attitude. It's quite prevalent in the movies. From R.I.P.D., where Proctor explains to Nick:

"Until they pop, they look like regular people, so no one except us knows they're monsters inside. You see, if you slip through the cracks, and stay on earth after you die, your soul rots. They rot, the world rots. Global warming, Black Plague, bad cell reception, you get it?"

Yep, we get it, he's a copper with fifteen years experience and because he's a man that makes him a mentally-deficient halfwit 3-year-old. The condescending snark gets more thick and irritating when she explains about some super-secret artefact that he is apparently supposed to know everything about - when he's been 2 days on the job.

I despised Proctor, just for that shit-dribbling attitude of condescending snark. I despise the movie-makers for putting that dogshit into their movie. Way to go you feminist-ass-kissing, man-hating, wanna-have-a-cunt pieces of shit.

When you run into anyone with this kind of attitude - ANYONE - walk or run away from them. You don't have time for that crap. I pity anyone who has someone like this in their life, especially if they're a family-member.

Remember, this is why it is often said in the Manosphere: never explain yourself - or anything - to a woman. The urge for them to take anything in the worst possible light - just to cause a fight (aka drama) - is strong in many women. You should run away from those mad fuckers as well.

Sunday, 8 September 2013

Refuting Feminism/Marxism

I have become so disgusted with this feminist/Marxist bullshit that it absolutely requires reversal - simply to show how full of crap it is. This is a public service, thoughtfully provided by yours truly: moi! Thank you, thank you, save your adulatory praise for later.

An easy way to rebut this horseshit is to reverse it - turn it around backwards - and look to see if it still makes any kind of sense. Lets start with some dribbling horseshit from these lunatics to analyse and rebut or expand upon:

"What is the present family based on? On capitalism, the acquisition of private property... The bourgeois sees in his wife nothing but production." -- Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto, 1848 http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html

Ah the Communist Manifesto, as penned by that destructive, hating bastard, Karl Marx himself. Let us reverse the key part of this:

"The bourgeois sees in her husband nothing but production." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Wow, ironically that is exactly how women view men: as a meal-ticket to a life of ease! No wonder that this resonates so well with women, its keyed to their inner desires and projective natures. Was Karl Marx secretly a woman, projecting her perspective upon men? Or did he know women so well that he realised that he could use their own small-souled, selfish nature to manipulate them?

"The overthrow of mother was the world historical defeat of the female sex. The man took control in the home also; the woman was degraded and reduced to servitude; she became the slave of his lust and a mere instrument for the production of children." -- Frederick Engels, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State

"The overthrow of father was the world historical defeat of the male sex. The woman took control in the home also; the man was degraded and reduced to servitude; he became the slave of her lust and a mere instrument for the production of children." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Wow, this looks to be what's happening right now. Marriage used as a vehicle for transferring wealth from men to women, both in the family and with divorce and after divorce in the form of continuing payments from the man to the woman. Just another form of slavery. Fuck, he was really on to it!

"Women are the creatures of an organized tyranny of men, as the workers are the creatures of an organized tyranny of idlers." -- Eleanor Marx, 1886 (Eleanor was Karl Marx's youngest daughter)

"Men are the creatures of an organised tyranny of women, as the workers are the creatures of an organised tyranny of idlers." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Ahuh, more modern slavery.

"Feminists have long criticized marriage as a place of oppression, danger, and drudgery for women." From the article, Is Marriage the Answer? by Barbara Findlen, Ms Magazine, May-June, 1995

"Feminists have long criticised marriage as a place of oppression, danger, and drudgery for men." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Ironic, given the dangers of marriage for men these days.

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan

"I feel that 'woman-hating' is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Mmmmmmmm, both statements just drip with hate. Interesting though that it is framed as "class-hatred" and not "sex-hatred". Either way, it's thinly-veiled racism. Not that thin either, for anyone with half a brain.

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage" -- Sheila Cronan

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for men, it is clear that the men's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for men cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- BlackPoisonSoul

That's an option, though we absolutely have to also eliminate any subsidies for women who have children. Otherwise us men are still enslaved, just differently - through high/extra taxes. Any woman who wants can quite happily have as many children as she desires with the bad-boys, she is quite capable of being a mother and working-woman without any oppressive help from us men.

Women do not need men for anything, including any form of support whatsoever. Feminism has taught her that, and feminism - aka other women, no matter how insanely fucked-up - would never lie to her!

"[M]ost mother-women give up whatever ghost of a unique and human self they may have when they 'marry' and raise children." -- Phyllis Chesler, Women and Madness, p.294

"[M]ost father-men give up whatever ghost of a unique and human self they may have when they 'marry' and raise children." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Ayup, quite true! This is why man should avoid women and become bachelors, rather than marry. It's also a lot more pleasant than being someone's slave.

"Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that" -- Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, "The Daily Illini," April 25, 1981

"Being a husband is an illegitimate profession... The choice to support and protect and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Apart from the obvious attack upon a woman's end-goal of lazy ease and comfort by forcing her to completely support herself from cradle to grave, it is quite correct: no man should be forced to be a father or husband. In fact, such planning is extremely detrimental for his sanity and health! Having to deal with the ongoing bratty fucktardisms from some dimwitted woman comes under the category of cruel and unusual punishment.

"The institution [of marriage] consistently proves itself unsatisfactory--even rotten.... The family is...directly connected to--is even the cause of--the ills of the larger society." -- Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (New York: Morrow, 1970), p. 254.

You can't exactly reverse this statement. However it does feed and support feminists removal of all chance for the life of ease and comfort that women want and expect from marriage. Thankfully, men are waking up to it and supporting this by refusing to oppress women with marriage.

We men also need to make absolutely sure that we do not oppress women with any form of financial support. THEY DO NOT NEED IT - feminism has told both us and them, that they actually WANT to be working from cradle to grave. They also do not need ANY help in the way of financial support - that just invites meddling in their affairs.

We are to keep our noses our of their vaginas, so in turn they can keep their hands out of our pockets. Fair's fair.

"It became increasingly clear to us that the institution of marriage `protects' women in the same way that the institution of slavery was said to `protect' blacks--that is, that the word `protection' in this case is simply a euphemism for oppression," -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 214.

"marriage is a form of slavery." -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 216.

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the Women's Movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 219.

"...the institution of marriage 'protects' men in the same way that the institution of slavery was said to 'protect' blacks...slavery...since marriage constitutes slavery for men...freedom for men cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Yep, us men need to remove ourselves from all oppression from women. No slavery for us! No oppressing women with our desires or any form of interference! Yep, you go girl - you can do it, enjoy working until the day you die! Typical woman's identification with a victim-mentality and conflation of women having it as hard in marriage as blacks had it under slavery. Odd how many women had slaves to do the housework for them, back in those days.

"If women are to effect a significant amelioration in their condition it seems obvious that they must refuse to marry." -- Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971), p. 317.

"If men are to effect a significant amelioration in their condition it seems obvious that they must refuse to marry." -- BlackPoisonSoul

This is the thinking behind the MGTOW manifesto in a nutshell. I can't fairly say that it's wrong, either: women are quite free to not marry, as are men. Simply keep your cunty mouths shut about our choice, because its none of your business what we decide - just as its none of ours to comment on yours. Your vagina, your choice - my cock and lifestyle and wallet, my choice.

"The plight of mothers is more desperate than that of other women, and the more numerous the children the more hopeless the situation seems to be.... Most women...would shrink at the notion of leaving husband and children, but this is precisely the case in which brutally clear rethinking must be undertaken." -- Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971), p. 320.

"The plight of fathers is more desperate than that of other men, and the more numerous the children the more hopeless the situation appears to be... Most men...would shrink at the notion of leaving wife and children, but this is precisely the case in which brutally clear rethinking must be undertaken." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Yes indeed! Such a clear call to abandonment and selfishness could not be better made. No wonder men are abandoning women at a great rate and getting money from them on an ongoing basis - oops, fuck, I mean the other way around. Right, well, now it's our turn to do the same. Or at least protect our own wallets from this tactic.

"Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men" -- Nancy Lehmann and Helen Sullinger, Declaration of Feminism, 1971

"Marriage has existed for the benefit of women; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over men... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of men. Therefore it is important for us to encourage men to leave their wives and not to live individually with women." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Reversed, the scent of hatred is strong. However one stupid oversight was made: it should have been a call to NEVER MARRY. In effect a celebration and endorsement of embracing slutdom and hookup culture. You go girl!

"...No woman should have to deny herself any opportunities because of her special responsibilities to her children. ... Families will be finally destroyed only when a revolutionary social and economic organization permits people's needs for love and security to be met in ways that do not impose divisions of labor, or any external roles, at all." -- Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969

"...No man should have to deny himself any opportunities because of his special responsibilities to his children." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Another call to irresponsibility and promiscuity. Slutty hook-up culture for the win, ride that cock-carousel! Missing one part though, it should have been: "...her husband and children." Then complete abandonment can begin.

"Families make possible the super-exploitation of women by training them to look upon their work outside the home as peripheral to their 'true' role. -- Andrea Dworkin

"Families make possible the super-exploitation of men by training them to look upon their work outside the home as peripheral to their 'true' role." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Have to enjoy the quotes around 'true' - nothing promotes sarcasm so clearly in text. So, what is the 'true' role of a man? A slave! So we must remove all slavery from men, setting them entirely free for all time from the oppression of women. They don't need no steenking man!

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin

"I want to see a woman beaten to a bloody pulp with a steel-toed workboot shoved in her mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Mmmmmmmm such a delicious image - the reek of sickening hate and poison is clearly revealed from both statements.

"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo." -- Valerie Solanas http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html and http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/chance.html

"To call a woman an animal is to flatter her; she's a machine, a walking fuck-hole." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Actually I couldn't think of an appropriate insulting word that was the equivalent of incubator. Either way, the hatred drips like poison.

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catherine Mackinnon

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a man." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Ah, such oppression - the revealed sickness quite takes your breath away. Someone should have strangled this sick cunt on birth. At any rate, it is definitely missing the call to the destruction and removal of marriage. Quite on a par with this:


"My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter." -- Marilyn French; The Woman's Room

"My feelings about women are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the beautiful young beauty-contest winner fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in her stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What she was, as a person, I mean, what her shames and yearnings were, simply doesn't matter." -- BlackPoisonSoul

Mmm nice conflation between men automatically being Nazi-like. Funny though, I don't remember the average man being into the mass-genocide of women. Perhaps we should set up a few camps just for their extermination, so that there can actually be some truth for this conflation. I could do with a few lampshades made of female skin and some tables made of female bones, as Himmler was alleged to have done.

Do I have to explicitly state that this is sarcasm, for the fucking retarded cunts out there who espouse feminism?

Oh, wait - you're so fucking retarded that you think that feminism is actually relevant and worthwhile. The reality is that any woman who espouses these beliefs is brainwashed, stupid, taking advantage, or all three. I'm picking all three. The men who espouse these beliefs do so because they're brainwashed, stupid, think it'll get them laid, or all three. I'm picking all three.

Get back in the fucking kitchen you crazy cunt, and make me a good sandwich. None of your lip either, or you can get the fuck out and work until you die.

No fucking freebies for you!

Friday, 6 September 2013

Stinking Attitudes

Modern "women" have really stinking attitudes:


Oh, we have an idea of how fucking crazy you are all right! You aren't a woman, you're a fucked-up mess of what a woman thinks a man is.

You're wrong there too.

Yes this is extremely attractive. These people cannot seriously have no idea why they cannot find or keep a man, can they.

...can they?

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Feminism is Terrorism

So, the latest garbage from the pieces of shit - can't call them women so they must have been crapped out of their Mommas ass - activists going by the name of "cliteracy":


Sadly, these cunts appear to be real. h/t to JudgyBitch for bringing them to our attention and from whom I've stolen the graphics.

It's enough to make you sigh in discouragement: another bunch of crazy cunts with their message of loopy-Lou fucktardism attempting to fill women's heads with more stupid messages aka propaganda aka fucked up shit.

Here is my rebuttal to this meme, thank you JB:


Enjoy the fucked-up poison that these deranged people put so eloquently on display. Enjoy pointing out just how fucked-up these retards are to all and sundry.

In the end, pointing the finger and mocking someone is the best cure for this kind of shit. Pass it on with glee!